Correlation between anti-interferon-β binding and neutralizing antibodies in interferon-β-treated multiple sclerosis patients

2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (10) ◽  
pp. 1311-1317 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. E. H. Jensen ◽  
F. Sellebjerg ◽  
H. B. Søndergaard ◽  
P. S. Sørensen
2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (8) ◽  
pp. 1081-1085 ◽  
Author(s):  
AK Hedström ◽  
L Alfredsson ◽  
M Lundkvist Ryner ◽  
A Fogdell-Hahn ◽  
Jan Hillert ◽  
...  

Background: Smoking may contribute to the induction of neutralizing antibodies to interferon β-1a. Objective: In this study, we aimed to investigate the influence of smoking on the risk of developing antibodies to natalizumab, another biological drug in the treatment of multiple sclerosis. Methods: This report is based on 1338 natalizumab-treated multiple sclerosis patients included in either of two Swedish case-control studies in which information on smoking habits was collected. Using logistic regression, patients with different smoking habits were compared regarding risk of developing anti-natalizumab antibodies, by calculating odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Results: Compared with nonsmokers, the odds ratio of developing anti-natalizumab antibodies was 2.4 (95% CI 1.2–4.4) for patients who smoked at the time of screening, and a significant trend showed higher risk of developing antibodies with higher intensity of smoking. When smoking within two years prior to screening was considered, the odds ratio of developing anti-natalizumab antibodies was 2.7 (1.5–5.1). Interpretations: The finding strengthens our hypothesis of the lungs as immune-reactive organs on irritation in relation to autoimmune responses, and may also be of clinical relevance since antibodies against natalizumab abrogate the therapeutic effect of the treatment.


2007 ◽  
Vol 13 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 44-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florian Deisenhammer

Interferon-β (IFN-β), a type I cytokine, is first-line therapy for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), a progressive neurological disease that can result in severe disability. As with all protein-based therapies, treatment with IFN-β can result in the development of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs), which has been shown to reduce the efficacy of the regimen. Recently, assays that evaluate patients for the presence of NAbs have received increased attention as a potentially valuable diagnostic tool in assessing the therapeutic effect of a chosen IFN-β regimen. However, despite the clinical desire to consistently monitor NAb levels in these patients, no standardized NAb assay has yet been identified. A lack of method standardization can lead to confusion when comparing NAb results over time and reduces the overall diagnostic value of assessing NAb status. This review will offer a summary of current NAb diagnostic methods and the factors that limit their consistency and practicality in the clinical setting. Alternatives to current methods for assessing NAb status will also be briefly discussed. Multiple Sclerosis 2007; 13: S44—S48. http://msj.sagepub.com


2006 ◽  
Vol 176 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 125-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roseane Santos ◽  
Bianca Weinstock-Guttman ◽  
Miriam Tamaño-Blanco ◽  
Darlene Badgett ◽  
Robert Zivadinov ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 387-397 ◽  
Author(s):  
L Durelli ◽  
P Barbero ◽  
A Cucci ◽  
B Ferrero ◽  
A Ricci ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 1127-1137 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Boz ◽  
J. Oger ◽  
E. Gibbs ◽  
S.E. Grossberg ◽  

Multiple sclerosis (MS) patients treated with interferon-beta (IFN-β) often form anti-IFN-β antibodies accompanied by a reduction in IFN-β bioavailability. The clinical effect of these antibodies remains controversial. MS patients in British Columbia, Canada, must be diagnosed and evaluated annually by neurologists in an MS clinic in order to be reimbursed for their IFN-β prescriptions. We have identified at the UBC MS clinic a cohort of 262 patients, each having been treated with a single IFN-β preparation more than three years, some for nearly a decade. Of 119 patients treated with Betaseron® (IFN-β1b), 18 (15.1%) were neutralizing antibody positive (NAb+) at the time of the study, whereas of 131 treated with subcutaneous Rebif® (IFN-β1a SC), 16 (12.2%) were NAb+, but none of 12 treated with intramuscular Avonex ® (IFN-β1a) had detectable neutralizing antibodies. During the first two years of treatment, the relapse rate was significantly reduced from pre-treatment rates ( P < 0.001) and appeared to be unaffected by the subsequent NAb status. However, the relapse rates in the NAb+ patients were significantly greater than in the NAb— patients during years 3 ( P < 0.010) and 4 ( P < 0.027). Betaseron ®-treated NAb+ patients tended to have more relapses than NAb — patients during year 3 and this almost reached significance ( P = 0.056) but their relapse rate did not differ in year 4 and later. In contrast, Rebif ®-treated NAb+ patients tended to have more relapses in year 3 than Rebif ® -treated NAb — patients ( P = 0.074), but in year 4 they clearly ( P = 0.009) had more relapses than Rebif ®-treated NAb — patients. There was no convincing effect on progression of disability in any group. Multiple Sclerosis 2007; 13: 1127—1137. http://msj.sagepub.com


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document