Including children with special educational needs in mainstream classrooms: implications for pedagogy from a systematic review

2006 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 116-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melanie Nind ◽  
Janice Wearmouth
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-27
Author(s):  
Mark Carter ◽  
Amanda Webster ◽  
Jennifer Stephenson ◽  
Neale Waddy ◽  
Robert Stevens ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Mark Carter ◽  
Amanda Webster ◽  
Jennifer Stephenson ◽  
Neale Waddy ◽  
Robert Stevens ◽  
...  

Abstract The current study was conducted to examine the types of adjustments used to support students with special educational needs in mainstream classrooms and how schools monitored the effectiveness of the adjustments they use. A range of stakeholders were interviewed in 22 mainstream schools across New South Wales, Australia, and the interviews were analysed for key themes. Some schools had a narrow focus on a few key areas, with teaching assistants being the most commonly reported adjustment. Few schools used formal formative monitoring to evaluate the effectiveness of adjustments. Options for improvement schools could consider include examining the breadth of adjustments, establishing clear measurable goals, considering alternative strategies for use of teaching assistants, and ensuring adjustments are monitored.


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sepideh Hassani ◽  
Susanne Schwab

In the last decades, social-emotional learning interventions have been implemented in schools with the aim of fostering students’ non-academic competences. Evaluations of these interventions are essential to assess their potential effects. However, effects may vary depending on students’ variables. Therefore, the current systematic review had three main objectives: 1) to identify the effectiveness of social-emotional learning interventions with students with special educational needs, 2) to assess and evaluate those intervention conditions leading to effective outcomes in social-emotional competences for this population, and 3) to draw specific conclusions for the population of students with special educational needs. For this purpose, studies were retrieved from the databases Scopus, ERIC, EBSCO and JSTOR, past meta-analysis and (systematic) reviews, as well as from journal hand searches including the years 1994–2020. By applying different inclusion criteria, such as implementation site, students’ age and study design, a total of eleven studies were eligible for the current systematic review. The primary findings indicate that most of the intervention studies were conducted in the United States and confirm some positive, but primarily small, effects for social-emotional learning interventions for students with special educational needs. Suggestions for future research and practice are made to contribute to the improvement of upcoming intervention studies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document