scholarly journals THE SYNOVIAL PROSTAGLANDIN SYSTEM IN CHRONIC INFLAMMATORY ARTHRITIS: DIFFERENTIAL EFFECTS OF STEROIDAL AND NONSTEROIDAL ANTI-INFLAMMATORY DRUGS

1981 ◽  
Vol 73 (4) ◽  
pp. 893-901 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. BOMBARDIERI ◽  
P. CATTANI ◽  
G. CIABATTONI ◽  
O. MUNNO ◽  
G. PASERO ◽  
...  
1988 ◽  
Vol 462 (2) ◽  
pp. 275-285 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Ikonomidou-Turski ◽  
E.A. Cavalheiro ◽  
L. Turski ◽  
Z.A. Bortolotto ◽  
Z. Kleinrok ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 96-101
Author(s):  
V.B. Vasilyuk ◽  
◽  
G.I. Syraeva ◽  
M.V. Faraponova ◽  
◽  
...  

Gout is one of the most common forms of inflammatory arthritis. Medical care for gout includes non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). This paper reviews the efficacy and safety of NSAIDs prescribed for the acute attack of gout, in particular, AMBENIUM® parenteral. It was demonstrated that phenylbutazone is a powerful NSAID that provides significant analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects. Considering a broad spectrum of adverse reactions of NSAIDs, these agents should be prescribed and used under in-depth analysis of patient’s condition, comorbidities and the level of their decompensation, and potential drug interactions. In addition, optimal dosages and duration of NSAID treatment are of particular importance. The authors conclude that AMBENIUM® parenteral is an effective and safe therapeutic modality for gout. Its profile and risk/benefit ratio are regarded as “favorable” compared to other NSAIDs. KEYWORDS: gout, arthritis, pain, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, parenteral, efficacy, safety. FOR CITATION: Vasilyuk V.B., Syraeva G.I., Faraponova M.V. Efficacy and safety of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for acute attack of gout. Russian Medical Inquiry. 2021;5(2):96–101. DOI: 10.32364/2587-6821-2021-5-2-96-101.


2009 ◽  
Vol 490 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nirupama Lal ◽  
Jitendra Kumar ◽  
Warren E. Erdahl ◽  
Douglas R. Pfeiffer ◽  
Martha. E. Gadd ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A854-A854
Author(s):  
Pankti Reid ◽  
David Liew ◽  
Rajshi Akruwala ◽  
Anne Bass ◽  
Karmela Chan

BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer therapy but can result in toxicities, known as immune-related adverse events (irAEs), due to a hyperactivated immune system. ICI-related inflammatory arthritis has been described in literature, but herewith we introduce and characterize post-ICI activated osteoarthritis (ICI-aOA).MethodsWe conducted a multi-center, retrospective, observational study of patients with cancer treated with ICIs and diagnosed with ICI-aOA by a rheumatologist. ICI-aOA was defined by (1) an increase in non-inflammatory joint pain after ICI initiation, (2) in joints characteristically affected by osteoarthritis and (3) lack of inflammation on exam. Cases were graded using the CTCAE (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) V6.0 rubric for arthralgia. RECIST (Response evaluation criteria in solid tumors) V.1.1 (v.4.03) guidelines determined tumor response. Results were analyzed using Chi-squared tests of association and multivariate logistic regression.ResultsThirty-six patients had ICI-aOA with mean age at time of rheumatology presentation of 66 years (51–81yrs). Most patients had metastatic melanoma (10/36, 28%) and had received a PD1/PDL1 inhibitor monotherapy (31/36, 86%) with 5/36 (14%) combination therapy. Large joint involvement (hip/knee) was noted in 53% (19/36), small joints of hand 25% (9/36), and spine 14% (5/36). Two-thirds (24/36) suffered multiple joint involvement. Three of 36 (8%) had CTCAE grade 3, 14 (39%) grade 2 and 19 (53%) grade 1 manifestations. Symptom onset ranged from six days to 33.8 months with median of 5.2 months after ICI initiation; 5 patients suffered ICI-aOA after ICI cessation (0.6, 3.5, 4.4, 7.3 and 15.4 months after ICI cessation) (figure 1). Most common form of therapy was intra-articular corticosteroid injections only (15/36, 42%) followed by NSAIDs only (7/36, 20%) (figure 2). Twenty patients (56%) experienced other irAEs, with rheumatic and dermatologic being the most common. All three patients with high-grade ICI-aOA also had another irAE diagnosis at some point after ICI initiation.ConclusionsICI-aOA should be recognized as an adverse event of ICI immunotherapy. Early referral to a rheumatologist can facilitate the distinction between ICI induced inflammatory arthritis from post-ICI mechanical arthropathy, the latter of which can be managed with local therapy that will not compromise ICI efficacy.Ethics ApprovalCollection of patient data was approved by local Institutional Review Boards at respective institutions: Hospital for Special Surgery in New York (HSS IRB # 2017–1898), University of Chicago in Chicago, Illinois (IRB150837) and Austin Health in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (HREC/18/Austin/102).Abstract 817 Figure 1Incidence of ICI-aOA (activated osteoarthritis after immune-checkpoint inhibitor) ranged from the first month after ICI initiation up until month 22 after ICI initiation, with most cases occurring in the first 6 months after start of ICI. Five of 36 patients experienced ICI-aOA after ICI cessation (0.6, 3.5, 4.4, 7.3 and 15.4 months after ICI cessation), corresponding to presentation after ICI initiation as follows: 2.0, 9.6, 19.1, 8.7 and 16.1 months after ICI initiation, respectively (as denoted in darker color). ICI: Immune-checkpoint inhibitor, NSAIDs: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, DMARDs: Disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugsAbstract 817 Figure 2Therapeutic option most used was local or intra-articular corticosteroid therapy, followed by conservative management with physical therapy only then NSAIDs. Most patients experienced improvement in signs and symptoms with treatment. ICI: Immune-checkpoint inhibitor, NSAIDs: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, DMARDs: Disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document