Electronic Fetal Monitoring in the United States

Birth ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 105-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce L Flamm
2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 94-103
Author(s):  
Judith A. Lothian

Maternity care in the United States continues to be intervention intensive. The routine use of intravenous fluids, restrictions on eating and drinking, continuous electronic fetal monitoring, epidural analgesia, and augmentation of labor characterize most U.S. births. The use of episiotomy has decreased but is still higher than it should be. These interventions disturb the normal physiology of labor and birth and restrict women's ability to cope with labor. The result is a cascade of interventions that increase risk, including the risk of cesarean surgery, for women and babies. This paper describes the use and effect of routine interventions on the physiologic process of labor and birth and identifies the unintended consequences resulting from the routine use of these interventions in labor and birth.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 145-153
Author(s):  
Sonya Dal Cin ◽  
Lisa Kane Low ◽  
Denise Lillvis ◽  
Megan Masten ◽  
Raymond De Vries

BACKGROUNDGuidelines published by professional associations of midwives, obstetricians, and nurses in the United States recommend against using continuous cardiotocography (CTG) in low-risk patients. In the United States, CTG or electronic fetal/uterine monitoring (EFM) rather than auscultation with a fetoscope or Pinard horn is the norm. Interpretation of the fetal heart rate (FHR) and uterine activity (UA) tracings provided by continuous EFM may be associated with the decision for a cesarean birth. Typically, consent is not sought in the decision about type of monitoring. No studies were identified where women's attitudes about the need to consent to the type of fetal monitoring used during labor have been explored. Therefore, the purpose of this research was to examine women's attitudes about the use of EFM in a healthcare setting.METHODSWe asked a sample of women aged 18–50 years to respond to one of three monitoringscenarios. The scenarios were used to distinguish between attitudes about monitoring in general, monitoring the health of a mother in labor, and monitoring the health of the fetus during labor. Wemeasured their level of interest in being monitored and their opinions about whether healthcare providers should be required to obtain consent for the monitoring described in the scenario.RESULTSInterest in receiving monitoring (across all three scenarios) was moderate, with the highest level of interest in monitoring the fetus during labor and the least interest in monitoring a general health context. Across all scenarios, 82% of respondents believed that practitioners should obtain consent for monitoring, 14% were unsure, and 4% said there should not be a requirement for consent. While low (6%), the percentage responding that consent was not needed was highest in monitoring a fetus in labor.CONCLUSIONSWomen in our study expressed a strong preference for the opportunity to consent to the use of monitoring regardless of the healthcare scenario. There is findings suggest the need for further research exploring what women do and do not know about CTG and what their informed performance are a pressing need to rethink the role of a pressing need to rethink the role of shared decision-making and informed consent about the type of monitoring use during labor.


2014 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-98
Author(s):  
C.V. Ananth ◽  
S.P. Chauhan ◽  
H.Y. Chen ◽  
M.E. D’Alton ◽  
A.M. Vintzileos

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1979 ◽  
Vol 63 (6) ◽  
pp. 942-951
Author(s):  
John C. Hobbins ◽  
Roger Freeman ◽  
John T. Queenan

Medical technology has improved at a staggering pace, and perhaps obstetrics is the field most affected by this progress. obstetrician now depends on information from electronic equipment to follow growth and development of the fetus, to diagnose fetal anomalies, and to assess the fetus's condition before and during birth. Since the equipment used for fetal surveillance is expensive to develop, acquire, and maintain, the technology has contributed somewhat to the rising cost of managing pregnancy. Since its intrOduction in 1960, electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) has become a Widely utilized modalitv. and it is estimated that the technique is used in Over half the labors in the United States.


2013 ◽  
Vol 121 (5) ◽  
pp. 927-933 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cande V. Ananth ◽  
Suneet P. Chauhan ◽  
Han-Yang Chen ◽  
Mary E. D’Alton ◽  
Anthony M. Vintzileos

2012 ◽  
Vol 206 (1) ◽  
pp. S289
Author(s):  
Cande V. Ananth ◽  
Suneet P. Chauhan ◽  
Han-Yang Chen ◽  
Mary E. D'Alton ◽  
Anthony M. Vintzileos

2006 ◽  
Vol 195 (3) ◽  
pp. 729-734 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence D. Devoe ◽  
Michael Ross ◽  
Clayton Wilde ◽  
Maureen Beal ◽  
Andrej Lysikewicz ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 198-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith A. Lothian

Maternity care in the United States is intervention intensive. The routine use of intravenous fluids, restrictions on eating and drinking, continuous electronic fetal monitoring, epidural analgesia, and augmentation of labor characterize most U.S. births. The use of episiotomy is far from restrictive. These interventions disturb the normal physiology of labor and birth and restrict women’s ability to cope with labor. The result is a cascade of interventions that increase risk, including the risk of cesarean surgery, for women and babies. This article is an updated evidence-based review of the “Lamaze International Care Practices That Promote Normal Birth, Care Practice #4: No Routine Interventions,” published in The Journal of Perinatal Education, 16(3), 2007.


2002 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 762-770 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. David Banta ◽  
Stephen B. Thacker

Objectives: The assessment of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) carried out by the authors in the late 1970s provides an early case of a systematic review of evidence in health technology assessment. This paper identifies lessons pertinent for the present day in this field.Methods: We reviewed our own files for the description of our assessment and reactions to it. We also reviewed recent literature to evaluate our observations in relation to recent evidence.Results: Our findings of insufficient evidence of efficacy and concerns about safety have been confirmed by subsequent research. Still, despite findings and recommendations of prominent professional and governmental bodies, EFM continues in widespread use in the United States and Europe and is spreading into developing countries around the world. Aggressive attacks on our assessment as well as our skills and integrity have been mirrored in recent years by criticism of other researchers in health technology assessment.Conclusions: The case of EFM points to the limitations of assessment without other actions to assure the implementation of results. Health technologies that are accepted by the majority of clinicians in a particular field may require extraordinary efforts to assure appropriate use of technology assessments.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document