American Society of Diagnostic and Interventional Nephrology Section Editor: Stephen Ash: Port Catheter Placement by Nephrologists in an Interventional Nephrology Training Program

2004 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aslam Pervez ◽  
Fahim Zaman ◽  
Asim Aslam ◽  
Suzie Petty ◽  
Sara Murphy ◽  
...  
2005 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 558-564 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunanda J. Ram ◽  
Raja Nassar ◽  
Rashid Sharaf ◽  
Alberto Magnasco ◽  
Steven A. Jones ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 21 (02) ◽  
pp. 103-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Harish ◽  
Y. Madhu

2013 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 689-696 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suat Zengin ◽  
Sinem Kabul ◽  
Behcet Al ◽  
Emine Sarcan ◽  
Mehmet Doğan ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 177-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arif H. Kamal ◽  
Doris Quinn ◽  
Timothy D. Gilligan ◽  
Barbara Corning Davis ◽  
Carole K. Dalby ◽  
...  

CONTEXT AND QUESTION ASKED: Improving quality of oncology delivery is an important responsibility for busy oncology practices. Is it feasible to construct a training program for oncology professionals to teach quality improvement that is applicable to practice? SUMMARY ANSWER: Using a longitudinal, project-based program with a mix of in-person and distance-learning components, the ASCO Quality Training Program is a highly feasible method to facilitate quality improvement learning in oncology. METHODS: The ASCO Quality Training Program (QTP) consisted of three in-person Learning Sessions and four phases: pre-work, planning, implementation, and sustain and spread. We measured two primary outcomes: program feasibility and effectiveness. BIAS, CONFOUNDING FACTOR(S), DRAWBACKS: Although we observed high participation, satisfaction, and applicability of content to the needs of the oncology learners, it should be noted that this represents a small, pilot project. REAL-LIFE IMPLICATIONS: Even busy oncology clinicians find a structured program to learn and practice quality improvement skills valuable. Conclusions regarding long-term applicability effectiveness and feasibility among non-early adopters require further study.


2010 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 449-455 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Castillo ◽  
Linda M. Goldenhar ◽  
Raymond C. Baker ◽  
Robert S. Kahn ◽  
Thomas G. DeWitt

Abstract Background Resident interest in global health care training is growing and has been shown to have a positive effect on participants' clinical skills and cultural competency. In addition, it is associated with career choices in primary care, public health, and in the service of underserved populations. The purpose of this study was to explore, through reflective practice, how participation in a formal global health training program influences pediatric residents' perspectives when caring for diverse patient populations. Methods Thirteen pediatric and combined-program residents enrolled in a year-long Global Health Scholars Program at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center during the 2007–2008 academic year. Educational interventions included a written curriculum, a lecture series, one-on-one mentoring sessions, an experience abroad, and reflective journaling assignments. The American Society for Tropical Medicine and Hygiene global health competencies were used as an a priori coding framework to qualitatively analyze the reflective journal entries of the residents. Results Four themes emerged from the coded journal passages from all 13 residents: (1) the burden of global disease, as a heightened awareness of the diseases that affect humans worldwide; (2) immigrant/underserved health, reflected in a desire to apply lessons learned abroad at home to provide more culturally effective care to immigrant patients in the United States; (3) parenting, or observed parental, longing to assure that their children receive health care; and (4) humanitarianism, expressed as the desire to volunteer in future humanitarian health efforts in the United States and abroad. Conclusions Our findings suggest that participating in a global health training program helped residents begin to acquire competence in the American Society for Tropical Medicine and Hygiene competency domains. Such training also may strengthen residents' acquisition of professional skills, including the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education competencies.


2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 186-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol J. Fabian ◽  
Frank L. Meyskens ◽  
Dean F. Bajorin ◽  
Thomas J. George ◽  
Joanne M. Jeter ◽  
...  

Purpose To assist in determining barriers to an oncology career incorporating cancer prevention, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Cancer Prevention Workforce Pipeline Work Group sponsored surveys of training program directors and oncology fellows. Methods Separate surveys with parallel questions were administered to training program directors at their fall 2013 retreat and to oncology fellows as part of their February 2014 in-training examination survey. Forty-seven (67%) of 70 training directors and 1,306 (80%) of 1,634 oncology fellows taking the in-training examination survey answered questions. Results Training directors estimated that ≤ 10% of fellows starting an academic career or entering private practice would have a career focus in cancer prevention. Only 15% of fellows indicated they would likely be interested in cancer prevention as a career focus, although only 12% thought prevention was unimportant relative to treatment. Top fellow-listed barriers to an academic career were difficulty in obtaining funding and lower compensation. Additional barriers to an academic career with a prevention focus included unclear career model, lack of clinical mentors, lack of clinical training opportunities, and concerns about reimbursement. Conclusion Reluctance to incorporate cancer prevention into an oncology career seems to stem from lack of mentors and exposure during training, unclear career path, and uncertainty regarding reimbursement. Suggested approaches to begin to remedy this problem include: 1) more ASCO-led and other prevention educational resources for fellows, training directors, and practicing oncologists; 2) an increase in funded training and clinical research opportunities, including reintroduction of the R25T award; 3) an increase in the prevention content of accrediting examinations for clinical oncologists; and 4) interaction with policymakers to broaden the scope and depth of reimbursement for prevention counseling and intervention services.


2002 ◽  
Vol 30 (9) ◽  
pp. 562-565
Author(s):  
Ismail Mihmanli ◽  
Murat Cantasdemir ◽  
Fatih Kantarci ◽  
Nil Molinas Mandel ◽  
Oktay Cokyuksel

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document