Acceleration-Dependent Left Bundle Branch Block with Severe Left Ventricular Dyssynchrony Results in Acute Heart Failure: Are There More Patients Who Benefit from Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy?

2006 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
KATJA ZEPPENFELD ◽  
MARTIN J. SCHALIJ ◽  
GABE B. BLEEKER ◽  
EDUARD R. HOLMAN ◽  
JEROEN J. BAX
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Acute Heart Failure ◽  
Left Bundle Branch Block ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Left Ventricular Dyssynchrony ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Bundle Branch Block ◽  
Ventricular Dyssynchrony

scholarly journals Acute Heart Failure Due to Transient Left Ventricular Dyssynchrony: Case Study

2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. e12-e14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthieu Jourdain ◽  
Jean Jacques Bauchart ◽  
Jean Luc Auffray ◽  
Thierry H. LeJemtel ◽  
Philippe Asseman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Acute Heart Failure ◽  
Left Bundle Branch Block ◽  
Systolic Dysfunction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Dyssynchrony ◽  
Beta Blockade ◽  
Bundle Branch Block ◽  
Ventricular Dyssynchrony

This case study describes an unusual cause of acute heart failure that resolved with early beta-blockade therapy. A 52-year-old woman who had acute heart failure with severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction and left bundle branch block was admitted to a university medical center. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images of the heart did not show any evidence of myocardial infarction or myocarditis. Rate-related left bundle branch block and subsequent left ventricular dyssynchrony resulted in acute systolic dysfunction that resolved with beta-blockade therapy that allowed heart rate control and narrowing of the QRS complex. Of note, the use of inotropic agents would have dramatically worsened the cardiac condition.

scholarly journals Relationship between left bundle branch block patterns and super-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure

2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (7) ◽  
pp. 4227
Author(s):  
N. E. Shirokov ◽  
V. A. Kuznetsov ◽  
V. V. Todosiychuk ◽  
A. M. Soldatova ◽  
D. V. Krinochkin
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Left Bundle Branch Block ◽  
Interventricular Septum ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Doppler Imaging ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Bundle Branch Block ◽  
Septal Wall ◽  
Group I

Aim. To assess a relationship of left bundle branch block (LBBB) patterns defined by electrocardiography (ECG) and echocardiography with super-response (SR) to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).Material and methods. Sixty patients (mean age, 54,5±10,4 years) were examined at baseline and during follow-up (10,6±3,6 months). Patients were divided into groups: group I (n=31) — decrease of left ventricular end-systolic volume (ESV) ≥30% (super-responders) and II group (n=29) — decrease of LV ESV <30% (non-super-responders). Three strain-markers of LBBB assessed by tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) and speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) were used: early contraction of basal or midventricular segment in the septal wall and early stretching of basal or midventricular segment in the lateral wall (marker 1); early peak contraction of the septal wall occurred in the first 70% of the systolic ejection phase (marker 2, septal flash (SF)); early stretching wall that showed peak contraction after aortic valve closure (marker 3). The classical LBBB pattern was defined if all three strain-markers were present. The heterogeneous LBBB pattern was defined if two from three strain-markers were present.Results. At baseline, groups did not differ in main clinical characteristics, including QRS width and LBBB assessed by ECG. Mechanical abnormalities were found only in group I: SF (32,3% vs 0,0%; p=0,001) and apical rocking (19,4% vs 0,0%; p=0,024), as well as classic LBBB mechanical pattern (20,8% vs 0,0%; p=0,05). The complex of heterogeneous LBBB mechanical pattern (odds ratio (OR), 7,512; 95% CI, 1,434-39,632; р=0,025), interventricular mechanical delay (OR, 1,037; 95% CI, 1,005-1,071; р=0,017) and longitudinal strain of interventricular septum mid segment (OR, 0,726; 95% CI, 0,540-0,977; р=0,035) had an independent relationship with SR. According to the ROC analysis, the sensitivity and specificity of model in SR prediction were 77,3% and 91,3% (AUC=0,862; p<0,001).Conclusion. SR is associated with both LBBB mechanical patterns assessed by STE and TDI. LBBB defined by ECG did not have significant association with SR to CRT.

scholarly journals His-optimized cardiac resynchronization therapy in a patient with heart failure and right bundle branch block: a case report

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dmytro Volkov ◽  
Dmytro Lopin ◽  
Stanislav Rybchynskyi ◽  
Dmytro Skoryi
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Right Bundle Branch Block ◽  
Clinical Status ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Bundle Branch Block ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Abstract Background  Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an option for treatment for chronic heart failure (HF) associated with left bundle branch block (LBBB). Patients with HF and right bundle branch block (RBBB) have potentially worse outcomes in comparison to LBBB. Traditional CRT in RBBB can increase mortality and HF deterioration rates over native disease progression. His bundle pacing may improve the results of CRT in those patients. Furthermore, atrioventricular node ablation (AVNA) for rate control in atrial fibrillation (AF) can be challenging in patients with previously implanted leads in His region. Case summary  We report the case of 74-year-old gentleman with a 5-year history of HF, permanent AF with a rapid ventricular response, and RBBB. He was admitted to the hospital with complaints of severe weakness and shortness of breath. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was decreased (41%), right ventricle (RV) was dilated (41 mm), and QRS was prolonged (200 ms) with RBBB morphology. The patient underwent His-optimized CRT with further left-sided AVNA. As a result, LVEF increased to 51%, RV dimensions decreased to 35 mm with an improvement of the clinical status during a 6-month follow-up. Discussion  Patients with AF, RBBB, and HF represent the least evaluated clinical subgroup of individuals with less beneficial clinical outcomes according to CRT studies. Achieving the most effective resynchronization could require pacing fusion from sites beyond traditional with the intention to recruit intrinsic conduction pathways. This approach can be favourable for reducing RV dilatation, improving LVEF, and maximizing electrical resynchronization.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document