Perceived Match or Mismatch on the Gottman Conflict Styles: Associations with Relationship Outcome Variables

2009 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 531-545 ◽  
Author(s):  
DEAN M. BUSBY ◽  
THOMAS B. HOLMAN
2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard C. Zamora ◽  
Jonathan P. Schwartz ◽  
Tammy Lowery Zacchilli ◽  
Raul Dela Cruz ◽  
Justin Gentile

2011 ◽  
Vol 64 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 262-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Branislava Brestovacki ◽  
Dragana Milutinovic ◽  
Tomislav Cigic ◽  
Vera Grujic ◽  
Dragana Simin

Introduction. Health care workers often come into conflict situations while performing their daily activities. People behave differently when they come into conflicts and they are usually not aware of their own reactions. The aim of this paper was to establish the presence of conflict styles among health workers and the differences in relation to demographic characteristics (education, working experience, managerial position). Material and Methods. The research was done as a cross-sectional study and through surveys. The conflict handling questionnaire was used as the research instrument. The questionnaire contained 30 statements arranged in five dimensions of conflict styles. The sample included one hundred nurses and fifty-five doctors. Results. The research showed that accommodating was the most often used conflict style. There was no significant difference in styles of managerial and non-managerial staff, but there was a significant difference in the styles adopted by doctors and nurses. It should be noted that nurses used avoiding and accommodating conflict styles much more often. Conclusion. It is important to increase the awareness of conflict existence and the possibility of solving the problem constructively in order to achieve more efficient duty performance.


1998 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheryl Buehler ◽  
Ambika Krishnakumar ◽  
Gaye Stone ◽  
Christine Anthony ◽  
Sharon Pemberton ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 259-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan K. Goodboy ◽  
San Bolkan
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Charles J. Gelso ◽  
Dennis M. Kivlighan ◽  
Rayna D. Markin

Although writing about the real relationship has existed from the beginnings of the talking cure,” it is only in recent years that empirical research has focused on this phenomenon. The real relationship is the personal relationship between patient and therapist marked by the extent to which each is genuine with the other and perceives/experiences the other in ways that are realistic. The strength of the real relationship is determined by both the extent to which it exists and the degree to which it is positive or favorable. In this chapter, a meta-analysis is presented on the association between the real relationship and the outcome of psychotherapy. Summed across 16 studies, this meta-analysis revealed a moderate association with outcome (r =.38, 95% confidence interval [.30, .47], p<.001, d = 0.80, N = 1,502 participants). This real relationship–outcome association was independent of the type of outcome studies and of the source of the measure. We also present frequent measures of the real relationship, limitations of the research, and patient contributions. The chapter concludes with diversity considerations and practice recommendations for developing and strengthening the real relationship.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document