Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus spp.: validation of susceptibility testing and in vitro activity of vancomycin, linezolid, tigecycline and daptomycin

Apmis ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 118 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
MATHIAS RATHE ◽  
LISE KRISTENSEN ◽  
SVEND ELLERMANN-ERIKSEN ◽  
MARIANNE KRAGH THOMSEN ◽  
HELGA SCHUMACHER
2008 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 296-298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feriha Cilli ◽  
Husnu Pullukcu ◽  
Sohret Aydemir ◽  
Oguz Resat Sipahi ◽  
Meltem Tasbakan ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S492-S492
Author(s):  
Steven Morgan ◽  
Sara Hwang ◽  
Ekaterina Efimova ◽  
Stephen Hawser ◽  
Ian Morrissey ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Eravacycline (ERV) is a fully-synthetic, fluorocycline antibacterial approved by the FDA and EMA for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI) in patients ≥18 years of age. The purpose of this study was to further monitor the in vitro activity of ERV against Gram-positive pathogens, such as Staphylococcus aureus (including methicillin-resistant S. aureus, MRSA), Enterococcus spp. (including vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus, VRE) and Streptococcus spp. Methods Isolates were collected globally during 2018 from various body sites. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined by CLSI broth microdilution. Antibiotic susceptibility was determined using the most recent CLSI breakpoints (30th ed CLSI M100 document), except for ERV and tigecycline (TGC) where FDA breakpoints from 2018 and 2005, respectively, were applied. Results Summary MIC data for ERV and select comparators are shown in the Table. ERV MIC50/90 for Enterococcus spp were 0.06/0.12 μg/mL and were not affected by the presence of vancomycin resistant mechanisms. The MIC90 of ERV against VRE was 2-fold lower than TGC, at a value of 0.12 μg/mL. ERV MIC90 values for methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) was 0.12 μg/mL and for MRSA was 0.25 μg/mL. Generally, for all pathogens, ERV MIC90 values were 2- to 4-fold lower than TGC. Table Conclusion ERV in vitro activity was demonstrated for clinically important Gram-positive pathogens, including resistant isolates. Overall, ERV demonstrated lower MIC90 values than comparators for all organisms. This 2018 global surveillance highlights ERV’s utility against Gram-positive organisms and further underscores its role in cIAI, where these pathogens play a causative role. Disclosures Steven Morgan, PharMD, Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals (Employee) Sara Hwang, PharMD, Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals (Employee) Ekaterina Efimova, PharMD, Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals (Employee) Stephen Hawser, PhD, Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Virgil Lijfrock, PharMD, Tetraphase (Employee)


1999 ◽  
Vol 43 (11) ◽  
pp. 2776-2779 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. O. Matsumura ◽  
L. Louie ◽  
M. Louie ◽  
A. E. Simor

ABSTRACT Using checkerboard and time-kill assays, we evaluated the in vitro activity of quinupristin-dalfopristin (RP 59500) alone and in combination with five other antimicrobial agents against 12 clinical strains of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium(VREF). In time-kill studies, six VREF strains exhibited synergism with the combination of quinupristin-dalfopristin and doxycycline and three exhibited synergism with quinupristin-dalfopristin plus ampicillin-sulbactam. Combinations of quinupristin-dalfopristin with these and other agents warrant further clinical evaluation for the treatment of serious VREF infections.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document