Incidence and types of congenital cardiovascular malformations in Japanese trisomy 21 fetuses around 20 weeks

2000 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinichi Miyabara ◽  
Masahiko Ando ◽  
Kaoru Suzumori ◽  
Makoto Nishibatake ◽  
Nakamichi Saito ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Weigert ◽  
O Alejo-Valle ◽  
M Labuhn ◽  
V Amstislavskiy ◽  
S Emmrich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Somatechnics ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 235-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mel Y. Chen

In this paper I would like to bring into historical perspective the interrelation of several notions such as race and disability, which at the present moment seem to risk, especially in the fixing language of diversity, being institutionalised as orthogonal in nature to one another rather than co-constitutive. I bring these notions into historical clarity primarily through the early history of what is today known as Down Syndrome or Trisomy 21, but in 1866 was given the name ‘mongoloid idiocy’ by English physician John Langdon Down. In order to examine the complexity of these notions, I explore the idea of ‘slow’ populations in development, the idea of a material(ist) constitution of a living being, the ‘fit’ or aptness of environmental biochemistries broadly construed, and, finally, the germinal interarticulation of race and disability – an ensemble that continues to commutatively enflesh each of these notions in their turn.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document