TING FACTORS FROM THE TEST ANXIETY AND GENERAL ANXIETY QUESTION- NAIRES AND THE MANIFEST ANXIETY SCALE BETWEEN TWO SAMPLES OF UNIVERSITY STUDENTS1

1964 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-50
Author(s):  
Julius Sassenrath ◽  
Howard Kight ◽  
Henry F. Kaiser
PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. e0245200
Author(s):  
Ahmed M. Megreya ◽  
Denes Szűcs ◽  
Ahmed A. Moustafa

Science anxiety refers to students’ negative emotions about learning science. Across two studies, we investigated the psychometric properties of the newly developed Abbreviated Science Anxiety Scale (ASAS), which was adapted from the modified Abbreviated Math Anxiety Scale (m-AMAS) (Carey E., 2017). Using a sample of students in grades 7 to 10 (N = 710), Study 1 reported a two-factor structure of the ASAS (learning science anxiety and science evaluation anxiety) and negative associations between the ASAS factors and science achievement. Study 2 replicated this two-factor model in students in grades 11 and 12 (N = 362) and found that students in the “Arts” track were more anxious about science than those in “Sciences” track. Both studies consistently reported positive inter-correlations between the ASAS factors, with good internal reliabilities and modest meaningful associations with test anxiety and general anxiety, suggesting that science anxiety might be a distinct construct. Further, female students had higher science anxiety (especially science evaluation anxiety) than male students, even when test anxiety and general anxiety were considered in models. In summary, the ASAS is a brief, valid, and reliable instrument that can be used to guide and improve science education.


1989 ◽  
Vol 69 (3-2) ◽  
pp. 1391-1394 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Beer

Over a 2-wk. period 15 high school students passively viewed a Necker cube for 5 trials (90 sec. per trial). The number of reversals per trial indicates there were practice effects. Measures of tolerance of ambiguity (Tolerance of Ambiguity), anxiety (General Anxiety Scale and Test Anxiety Scale), and rigidity (Breskin's Rigidity) were administered. Pearson correlations indicate that tolerance of ambiguity was not associated with viewing an ambiguous figure, the Necker cube. Analysis also suggests the more rigid the person's outlook, the fewer reversals were reported, and exposure to viewing the figure lowers anxiety.


1994 ◽  
Vol 74 (2) ◽  
pp. 512-514 ◽  
Author(s):  
Garrett Call ◽  
Joe Beer ◽  
John Beer

116 boys and girls in elementary Grades 4, 5, and 6 were administered the General Anxiety Scale, Test Anxiety Scale, and the Shyness Scale. Their GPAs were obtained from school records as were Normal Curve Equivalents from the Iowa Tests of Basic Skills given the previous school year. Children of divorced parents ( n = 31) had lower GPAs than children of nondivorced parents ( n = 85). The girls had higher GPAs and general anxiety scores than the boys. The students who scored lower on test anxiety had higher Normal Curve Equivalents. Pearson correlations were significant for scores on Test Anxiety with those on general anxiety ( r = .57), GPA ( r = − .25), and Normal Curve Equivalents ( r = – .26). Normal Curve Equivalents correlated significantly with GPA ( r = .66), but shyness did not correlate significantly with any other measure.


1991 ◽  
Vol 69 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1128-1130 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Beer

27 gifted students in junior high and high school from north central Kansas school districts were administered the Children's Depression Inventory, the Beck Depression Scale, Test Anxiety Scale, General Anxiety Scale, and Breskin's Rigidity Scale. Sex, age, and grade were not considered, as the sample was small. The gifted students' mean scores for depression were below the cut-off score while their test anxiety, general anxiety, and rigidity scores were at moderate levels. Pearson correlations were significant for Beck Depression with the Children's Depression ( r = .82) and General Anxiety Scales ( r = .60). Scores on the General Anxiety Scale correlated significantly with those on the Children's Depression Inventory ( r = .69) and the Test Anxiety Scale ( r = .55). Rigidity scores were not correlated significantly with any other measure and scores on the depression scales did not correlate significantly with those on the Test Anxiety Scale.


1975 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 505-506 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louis H. Primavera ◽  
Sidney H. Hochman ◽  
William F. Reynolds

This study investigated the correlations among compulsivity, as measured by the Breskin Rigidity Test, anxiety, as measured by the Taylor Manifest Anxiety Scale, and gullibility, measured by Forer's technique. Anxiety scores of 44 undergraduate men and 54 women correlated .52 with gullibility scores, replicating previous findings. Compulsivity scores correlated −.23 with anxiety scores and were not related to gullibility scores ( r = −.15). These results were contrary to expectation, since previous research had suggested that compulsivity indexed by other tests should be positively related to both anxiety and gullibility.


1989 ◽  
Vol 69 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1391-1394 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Beer

Over a 2-wk. period 15 high school students passively viewed a Necker cube for 5 trials (90 sec. per trial). The number of reversals per trial indicates there were practice effects. Measures of tolerance of ambiguity (Tolerance of Ambiguity), anxiety (General Anxiety Scale and Test Anxiety Scale), and rigidity (Breskin's Rigidity) were administered. Pearson correlations indicate that tolerance of ambiguity was not associated with viewing an ambiguous figure, the Necker cube. Analysis also suggests the more rigid the person's outlook, the fewer reversals were reported, and exposure to viewing the figure lowers anxiety.


1987 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jack J. Wisniewski ◽  
Judy L. Genshaft ◽  
James A. Mulick ◽  
Daniel L. Coury

Test-retest reliabilities of the Revised Children's Manifest Anxiety Scale over 1- and 5-wk. intervals were examined for two samples of students, 73 boys and 88 girls in regular sixth, seventh and eighth grade classrooms (11 yr. to 14 yr). For raw scores the test-retest Pearson r was .88 (1-wk.) and .77 (5-wk.), indicating good reliability. For both samples there was a small difference between test (12.2 for 1-wk. sample; 11.4 for 5-wk. sample) and retest (11.2 for 1-wk. sample; 9.8 for 5-wk. sample) mean raw scores. Implications for test use are discussed.


1964 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 379-386 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julius M. Sassenrath ◽  
Howard R. Kight ◽  
Irene Athey

Four paired-associate lists of English words were constructed: non-difficult, non-competitive; non-difficult, competitive; difficult, non-competitive; and difficult, competitive. In Exp. I 90 Ss formed a 2 by 2 design. The results indicated that the main effects of competition and difficulty were significant. Exp. II tested hypotheses relating (1) scores on the Manifest Anxiety Scale to response competition, and (2) scores on the Test Anxiety Questionnaire to task difficulty. A 3 (MAS) by 3 (TAQ) design with 90 Ss and a covariate of denotative meaning showed no significant differences on any of the four lists. These results raise questions about anxiety drive and denotative meaning in verbal learning.


2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sylvia Z. Ramirez ◽  
Sachin Jain ◽  
Leila L. Flores-Torres ◽  
Roxanna Perez ◽  
Peter L. Kranz

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document