PRINCIPLES OF TORT LIABILITY AND ELEMENTS OF EMERGENCY HEALTH CARE FOR EDUCATORS: A SELF-INSTRUCTIONAL TEXT DEVELOPED THROUGH THE USE OF A SYSTEMS MODEL AND INTRINSIC PROGRAMMING

1973 ◽  
Vol 43 (6) ◽  
pp. 345-349 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tom Hurt
Author(s):  
Andrea Fabbri ◽  
Fabio De Iaco ◽  
Giulio Marchesini ◽  
Francesco Rocco Pugliese ◽  
Clemente Giuffrida ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ambreen Sayani ◽  
Mandana Vahabi ◽  
Mary Ann O’Brien ◽  
Geoffrey Liu ◽  
Stephen W. Hwang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Individuals living with low income are less likely to participate in lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose computed tomography. Family physicians (FPs) are typically responsible for referring eligible patients to LCS; therefore, we sought to understand their perspectives on access to lung cancer screening for individuals living with low income in order to improve equity in access to LCS. Methods A theory-informed thematic analysis was conducted using data collected from 11 semi-structured interviews with FPs recruited from three primary care sites in downtown Toronto. Data was coded using the Systems Model of Clinical Preventative Care as a framework and interpretation was guided by the synergies of oppression analytical lens. Results Four overarching themes describe FP perspectives on access to LCS for individuals living with low income: the degree of social disadvantage that influences lung cancer risk and opportunities to access care; the clinical encounter, where there is often a mismatch between the complex health needs of low income individuals and structure of health care appointments; the need for equity-oriented health care, illustrated by the neglect of structural origins of health risk and the benefits of a trauma-informed approach; and finally, the multiprong strategies that will be needed in order to improve equity in health outcomes. Conclusion An equity-oriented and interdisciplinary team based approach to care will be needed in order to improve access to LCS, and attention must be given to the upstream determinants of lung cancer in order to reduce lung cancer risk.


Public Health ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 153 ◽  
pp. 9-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.A.H. Rocha ◽  
N.C. da Silva ◽  
P.V. Amaral ◽  
A.C.Q. Barbosa ◽  
J.V.M. Rocha ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natale Daniele Brunetti ◽  
Gianfranco Amodio ◽  
Luisa De Gennaro ◽  
Giulia Dellegrottaglie ◽  
Pier Luigi Pellegrino ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Jean-Baptiste Bouillon-Minois ◽  
Vincent Roux ◽  
Bruno Pereira ◽  
Mara Flannery ◽  
Carole Pelissier ◽  
...  

Background: The nuclear or radiation disaster risk within the French Auvergne-Rhone-Alpes state is low (but not absent) due to its proximity to four Nuclear Power Generation Centers and two regional cancer control centers. This study aims to compare subjective stress ratings for emergency health care workers regarding nuclear and radiation disasters between two locations: at work versus at home. Materials and Methods: We distributed an anonymous online questionnaire via RedCap® to all emergency health care workers who could be involved in patient care after a nuclear or radiation disaster. It comprised 18 questions divided into three parts—theoretical knowledge and practical assessment, stress assessment, and sociodemographic criteria. Results: We analyzed 107 responses. There was a significant 11-point increase in stress levels between work and home regarding nuclear or radiation disaster risks (p = 0.01). Less than 25% of emergency health care workers surveyed benefited from annual training. Conclusion: The stress levels of emergency health care workers regarding nuclear or radiation disaster were higher at work than at home and increased without annual training. It is important to increase knowledge about these protocols and to mandate yearly training for all workers potentially involved in these disasters.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document