Will the EU ban on bird imports mean the demise of bird populations in EAZA collections?

2009 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. WALTER ◽  
J. A. ELLIS ◽  
L. BINGAMAN LACKEY
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Irina Herzon

Intensification of agricultural land-use was shown to be the key reason behind declines in wildlifespecies associated with farmland. I looked at scenarios of agricultural development across the Baltic states ofEstonia, Latvia and Lithuania, and the ways they are seen to affect farmed environments as a habitat offarmland bird species. Community richness and abundance of many farmland bird species were positivelyrelated to the number of non-cropped elements within farmland, the local mixture of annual crop and grassfields, and the variety of field types. The above positive associations were strongest in open landscapes.There was a clear indication that the more intensively farmed areas across the region provided habitat forfewer bird species and individuals. The difference could partly be explained by the more heterogeneouslandscape and field areas in the latter. Within homogenous arable fields intensification of field managementwas reflected in a tangible decrease in farmland bird abundance, especially in species in need of edgestructures.Based on the interviews in Estonia and Finland I explored farmers’ interest in and knowledge offarmland wildlife, their understanding of the concept of biodiversity, and awareness of the potential causesbehind declines of farmland birds. Many farmers viewed biodiversity from a narrow perspective oftenexcluding species directly related to farming. In Finland farmers expressed concern about the decline incommon farmland species, but Estonian farmers did not, which might be related to the fact that these speciesare still very common. In both countries farmers rated intensification of agriculture as the major drivingforce behind farmland bird declines. The expressed interest in wildlife positively correlated with willingnessto undertake wildlife-friendly measures. Only farmers with agri-environment contracts targeted specificallyat biodiversity enhancement were more knowledgeable about practical on-farm activities favouring wildlife,and were more willing to employ them that the rest.The results suggest that, by contributing to simplification of the farmland structure, homogenisationof crops, and increase in intensity of field use EU agricultural policies will have a detrimental effect onfarmland bird populations in Eastern Europe. Farmers are on the whole positive to the idea of supportingwildlife in the fields, and are concerned about its decline, but they require payments to offset their incomeloss and extra work. Biodiversity conservation should be better integrated into the agri-environmentprogrammes if it to serve as awareness tool for farmers. I argue that with a foreseen tripling of cereal yieldsacross the region, the EU Council’s Göteborg target of slowing biodiversity decline by 2010 may not berealistic unless considerable improvements are made into the EU agricultural policy for the region.


2007 ◽  
Vol 12 (27) ◽  
Author(s):  
Collective Influenza team (ECDC)

Since the later part of June 2007, three European Union (EU) Member States (Czech Republic, Germany, and France) have recorded cases of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) of the subtype A/H5N1 in bird populations.


2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rinus van Schendelen
Keyword(s):  

2002 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 221-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernhard Wilpert

The paper presents an inside evaluation of the EuroPsyT project, funded by the EU Leonardo Program in 1999-2001. While standard research usually neglects to reflect on the internal and external constraints and opportunities under which research results are achieved, the paper stresses exactly those aspects: starting from a brief description of the overall objectives of the 11 countries project, the paper proceeds to describe the macro-context and the internal strengths and weaknesses of the project team, the internal procedures of cooperation,. and obstacles encountered during the research process. It winds up in noting some of the project's achievements and with a look towards future research.


2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 104-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enrique Gracia ◽  
Marisol Lila ◽  
Faraj A. Santirso

Abstract. Attitudes toward intimate partner violence against women (IPVAW) are increasingly recognized as central to understanding of this major social and public health problem, and guide the development of more effective prevention efforts. However, to date this area of research is underdeveloped in western societies, and in particular in the EU. The present study aims to provide a systematic review of quantitative studies addressing attitudes toward IPVAW conducted in the EU. The review was conducted through Web of Science, PsychINFO, Medline, EMBASE, PUBMED, and the Cochrane Library, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) recommendations. This review aimed to identify empirical studies conducted in the EU, published in English in peer-reviewed journals from 2000 to 2018, and analyzing attitudes toward IPVAW. A total of 62 of 176 eligible articles were selected according to inclusion criteria. Four sets of attitudes toward IPVAW were identified as the main focus of the studies: legitimation, acceptability, attitudes toward intervention, and perceived severity. Four main research themes regarding attitudes toward IPVAW emerged: correlates of attitudes, attitudes as predictors, validation of scales, and attitude change interventions. Although interest in this research area has been growing in recent years, the systematic review revealed important gaps in current knowledge on attitudes toward IPVAW in the EU that limits its potential to inform public policy. The review outlines directions for future study and suggests that to better inform policy making, these future research efforts would benefit from an EU-level perspective.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document