Dose-dependent presystemic elimination of propranolol due to hepatic first-pass metabolism in rats

1985 ◽  
Vol 37 (11) ◽  
pp. 826-828 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kikuo Iwamoto ◽  
Jun Watanabe
Pharmaceutics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 318 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji Sang Lee ◽  
So Hee Kim

This study investigated the pharmacokinetics of tofacitinib in rats and the effects of first-pass metabolism on tofacitinib pharmacokinetics. Intravenous administration of 5, 10, 20, and 50 mg/kg tofacitinib showed that the dose-normalized area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC) was significantly higher at 50 mg/kg than at lower doses, a difference possibly due to saturation of the hepatic metabolism of tofacitinib. Oral administration of 10, 20, 50, and 100 mg/kg tofacitinib showed that the dose-normalized AUC was significantly higher at 100 mg/kg than at lower doses, a difference possibly due to saturation of the intestinal metabolism of tofacitinib. Following oral administration of 10 mg/kg tofacitinib, the unabsorbed fraction from the rat intestine was 3.16% and the bioavailability (F) was 29.1%. The AUC was significantly lower (49.3%) after intraduodenal, compared to intraportal, administration, but did not differ between intragastric and intraduodenal administration, suggesting that approximately 46.1% of orally administered tofacitinib was metabolized through an intestinal first-pass effect. The AUC was also significantly lower (42%) after intraportal, compared to intravenous, administration, suggesting that the hepatic first-pass effect on tofacitinib after entering the portal vein was approximately 21.3% of the oral dose. Taken together, these findings suggest that the low F of tofacitinib is due primarily to intestinal first-pass metabolism.


1990 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 327-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshito TONE ◽  
Ken'ichiro KAWAMATA ◽  
Teruo MURAKAMI ◽  
Yutaka HIGASHI ◽  
Noboru YATA

Planta Medica ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 74 (03) ◽  
Author(s):  
N Ngo ◽  
Z Yan ◽  
TN Graf ◽  
DR Carrizosa ◽  
EC Dees ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-49
Author(s):  
Jagdale Sachin ◽  
Panbude Aishwarya ◽  
Navasare Priya

Background and Objective: Upon oral administration domeperidone is rapidly absorbed, but subjected to the first pass effect which lowers systemic bioavailability to 15%. Mucoadhesive tablet can remain attached to buccal mucosa and becomes capable of bypassing hepatic first-pass metabolism to improve absorption directly into systemic circulation. The present research work was carried with an aim to develop, evaluate and optimize mucoadhesive tablet containing domperidone (DOME) for buccal delivery using different bio-adhesive polymeric combinations. </P><P> Methods: The buccal tablets were formulated by wet granulation method using isopropyl alcohol. The preliminary formulations were prepared using combinations of HPMC K4, HPMC K15, HPMC K100, HPMC E5 as mucoadhesive polymers. 32 full factorial design was applied to determine the effect of independent variables like concentration of mucoadhesive polymers (HPMC K15 and HPMC K100) over dependent variables like mucoadhesive properties (swelling index, bioadhesive strength and in vitro drug release). The prepared mucoadhesive tablets were evaluated for their tablet properties and mucoadhesive properties. The interactions between drug and polymers were studied by Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) and Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC). </P><P> Results: All formulations of factorial design showed satisfactory physicochemical, mechanical and bioadhesive characteristics. The formulation F9 exhibited maximum cumulative drug release, mucoadhesive strength and swelling index. Conclusion: The developed buccal tablet of domperidone might prove alternative to bypass the hepatic first pass metabolism and to avoid degradation which in turn may result in reducing the frequency of administration. Thus, mucoadhesive tablet of domeperidone may become viable alternative overcoming the side effects; achieving greater therapeutic effectiveness and improving the patient compliance.


1988 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 620-624 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junzo NAKAMURA ◽  
Nobuaki SEKI ◽  
Hitoshi SASAKI ◽  
Juichiro SHIBASAKI

Xenobiotica ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 401-407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kei Suzuki ◽  
Kazuhiro Taniyama ◽  
Takao Aoyama ◽  
Yoshiaki Watanabe

2008 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 1097-1101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara K. Quinney ◽  
Raymond E. Galinsky ◽  
Vanida A. Jiyamapa-Serna ◽  
Yong Chen ◽  
Mitchell A. Hamman ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 38 (11) ◽  
pp. 1967-1975 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haruka Nishimuta ◽  
Kimihiko Sato ◽  
Yasuyuki Mizuki ◽  
Masashi Yabuki ◽  
Setsuko Komuro

1987 ◽  
Vol 36 (7) ◽  
pp. 1171-1174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junzo Nakamura ◽  
Tadahiro Nakamura ◽  
Samir Kumar Podder ◽  
Hitoshi Sasaki ◽  
Juichiro Shibasaki

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document