Non‐generally accepted accounting principles disclosures and audit committee chairs’ external directorships

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheng‐Hsun Lee
Keyword(s):  
Audit Committee ◽  
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ◽  
Accounting Principles

An Exploratory Study of the Valuation Properties of Cross-Listed Firms' IAS and U.S. GAAP Earnings and Book Values

2002 ◽  
Vol 77 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hollis Ashbaugh ◽  
Per Olsson
Keyword(s):  
Exploratory Study ◽  
Accounting Standards ◽  
Equity Market ◽  
Residual Income ◽  
International Accounting Standards ◽  
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ◽  
Listed Firms ◽  
Valuation Model ◽  
Accounting Principles ◽  
Book Values

Despite the increasing integration of global capital markets, there is little evidence on the valuation properties of cross-listed, non-U.S. firms' accounting variables. We use the relative performance of the earnings capitalization, the book value, and the residual income valuation models to explore the valuation properties of International Accounting Standards and U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles earnings and book values reported by non-U.S., cross-listed firms trading in a common equity market. Using non-U.S./non-U.K. firms whose shares trade on the International Stock Exchange Automated Quotation system in London, we find that the earnings capitalization model is the dominant accounting-based valuation model when crosslisted firms report under International Accounting Standards. In contrast, we find that when cross-listed firms report under U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, the residual income model is the dominant accountingbased valuation model. Our exploratory study provides insights into the valuation implications of allowing a dual reporting system for foreign registrants trading in a common equity market.

scholarly journals We Are Not Publicly Traded And So The Rules Dont Apply Or Do They Should They?

2011 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-106
Author(s):  
Kelly Noe
Keyword(s):  
Publicly Traded ◽  
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ◽  
Accounting Principles ◽  
A Company ◽  
Privately Held

This paper presents a case study of the accounting practices of a company that is privately held. The company follows Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) but has some questionable transactions. The paper then follows up with a discussion of baby-GAAP and possible consequences of two different GAAP options.

scholarly journals Impact of Changes in Accounting Standards on Earnings Management

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 166-175
Author(s):  
Kawa W. Muhamad ◽  
Subhi M. Saleh ◽  
Kees van Paridon
Keyword(s):  
Earnings Management ◽  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Accounting Standards ◽  
Reporting Quality ◽  
Quality Standards ◽  
Financial Reporting Quality ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ◽  
Financial Reporting Standards ◽  
Accounting Principles

This study considers the question whether the changes in Accounting Standards has led to companies making less use of earnings management. The paper is an attempt to investigate whether the application of high quality standards like International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) is related to high financial reporting quality. This study addresses this issue empirically. Furthermore, this research examines whether German companies that have applied IFRS have less earnings management compared to German companies that report according to the German Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GGAAP). The sample, consisting of two equally large listed companies in Germany (Südzucker Group and Henkel Group) from 2003-2014. The study suggests that IFRS-adopters show different earnings management performance compared to companies reporting under German GAAP. This finding contributes to the discussion on whether high quality standards are appropriate and operational in countries with weak investor protection rights. The result shows that adopters of IFRS in Germany can be related with less use of earnings management as a result of changes in accounting standards. This result is contradictory with previous research that was done by Van Tendeloo and Vanstraelen, (2005), and consistent with the previous research conducted by Ball et al. (2003).

scholarly journals The USA Federal Debt-to-GDP Ratio and The Unified Budget Act’s Lack of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 49-57
Author(s):  
Paul F. Gentle
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
The United States ◽  
Public And Private ◽  
True Nature ◽  
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ◽  
Accounting Principles ◽  
Trust Funds ◽  
The Usa ◽  
Federal Debt ◽  
Blue Line

Here in the beginning of 2021, two of the truly relevant federal public finance issues are presented in this article. One is the Debt-to GDP Ratio. The second topic is the true nature of deficits, surpluses and future liabilities treated in budgets constructed via the Unified Budget Act. Two graphs on these issues are included. This article shows that the present Debt-to-GDP ratio is relatively high, as if the nation similar to when the United States was in a period of a major war. This graph is shown in this article’s Figure 1. There has been evidence in the macroeconomic literature that indicates a high Debt-to-GDP ratio can possibly result in some degree of slowed economic growth. Though the literature is varied on that point. The reason for the possible crowding out effect has to do with the competition for loanable funds. There is competition from both the public and private demanders of those loanable funds. Furthermore, there is the reality that all federal trust fund balances of the United States must be used to hold U.S. Treasury bonds. For figure 2, two categories on U.S trust funds are shown. One category is the combined total of Social Security. Medicare, Disability and related funds. This is shown in a red line. All the other federal trust funds are indicated in a blue line. There is a graph that shows these two lines. The graph is of the percentage share between the two categories. As a result, the red and blue lines are inverse functions of each other. Over the eighty-year period (1940-2020), there has been variation if both the red and blue lines. The goal of this articles is for leaders and government analysts to be more aware of the issues of the USA Federal Debt to GDP Ratio and the Unified Budget Act’s lack of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.

Accounting Conservatism and Real Options

2007 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 449-467 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Smith
Keyword(s):  
Research And Development ◽  
Real Options ◽  
Relative Size ◽  
Accounting Conservatism ◽  
Differential Treatment ◽  
Development Projects ◽  
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ◽  
Accounting Principles ◽  
Fixed Assets ◽  
Ex Ante

I address the interaction between accounting conservatism and real options in both a staged investment and abandonment model. An accounting policy biased toward classifying a Good (Bad) project as Bad (Good) is conservative (aggressive). The accounting signal is optimally conservative when the ex ante unconditional expected terminal value is less than the second investment (staged investment) or value of the asset in its alternative use (abandonment). The relative size of the second investment is a proxy for the degree of sequentiality of the project. Because research and development projects typically require more sequential investment than fixed assets projects, the staged investment results are consistent with the differential treatment of these types of investment under U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.

Generally accepted accounting principles

2019 ◽  
pp. 41-48
Author(s):  
Paul M. Clikeman
Keyword(s):  
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ◽  
Accounting Principles
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document