Trophic ecology and ontogenetic diet shift of the blue skate ( Dipturus cf. flossada )

2020 ◽  
Vol 97 (2) ◽  
pp. 515-526
Author(s):  
Sarah Brown‐Vuillemin ◽  
Thomas Barreau ◽  
Jean‐Marie Caraguel ◽  
Samuel P. Iglésias
Uniciencia ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 210-230
Author(s):  
Julián Monge-Nájera

Velvet worms, also known as peripatus or onychophorans, are a phylum of evolutionary importance that has survived all mass extinctions since the Cambrian period. They capture prey with an adhesive net that is formed in a fraction of a second. The first naturalist to formally describe them was Lansdown Guilding (1797-1831), a British priest from the Caribbean island of Saint Vincent. His life is as little known as the history of the field he initiated, Onychophorology. This is the first general history of Onychophorology, which has been divided into half-century periods. The beginning, 1826-1879, was characterized by studies from former students of famous naturalists like Cuvier and von Baer. This generation included Milne-Edwards and Blanchard, and studies were done mostly in France, Britain, and Germany. In the 1880-1929 period, research was concentrated on anatomy, behavior, biogeography, and ecology; and it is in this period when Bouvier published his mammoth monograph. The next half-century, 1930-1979, was important for the discovery of Cambrian species; Vachon’s explanation of how ancient distribution defined the existence of two families; DNA and electron microscopy from Brazil; and primitive attempts at systematics using embryology or isolated anatomical characteristics. Finally, the 1980-2020 period, with research centered in Australia, Brazil, Costa Rica, and Germany, is marked by an evolutionary approach: from body and behavior to geographic distribution; the discovery of how they form their adhesive net; the reconstruction of Cambrian onychophoran communities, the first experimental taphonomy; the first country-wide map of conservation status (in Costa Rica); the first model of why they survive in cities; the discovery of new phenomena like food hiding, parental feeding investment, and ontogenetic diet shift; and the birth of a new research branch, onychophoran ethnobiology. While a few names often appear in the literature, most knowledge was produced by a mass of researchers who entered the field only briefly.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Karoline Fernanda Ferreira Agostinho ◽  
Leandro Rabello Monteiro ◽  
Ana Paula Madeira Di Beneditto

Abstract In this study, multi-tissue (yolk and carapace) stable isotope analysis was used to assess individual isotopic niche trajectories of nesting green turtles on Rocas Atoll, off northeastern Brazil, and to reveal a diet shift in the temporal dimension. The diet trajectories of individual green turtles were highly directional, with a stronger component towards decreasing values of δ15N from carapace to yolk. When the green turtles are in their foraging sites (temporal window measured by the yolk samples), they are more herbivores. Conversely, in a broader temporal window, the green turtles demonstrate a carnivore-omnivore strategy, such as represented by heavier δ15N values in the carapace. This finding confirms a temporal diet shift. This is the first study that applies trophic niche trajectories for sea turtles, adding a new isotopic tool to understand the trophic ecology of these migrant animals.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 85-88
Author(s):  
José Pablo Barquero González ◽  
Alvaro Vega-Hidalgo ◽  
Julián Monge-Nájera

We report, for the first time in onychophorans, food hiding, parental feeding investment and an ontogenetic diet shift two weeks after birth: from the parent’s adhesive used to capture prey, to the prey itself. 


2019 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. 100440 ◽  
Author(s):  
Virginia Carrozzi ◽  
Manfredi Di Lorenzo ◽  
Daniela Massi ◽  
Antonino Titone ◽  
Giandomenico Ardizzone ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 433-438 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. D. Kreitzer ◽  
M. C. Belk ◽  
D. B. Gonzalez ◽  
R. C. Tuckfield ◽  
D. K. Shiozawa ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 257-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Labropoulou ◽  
A. Machias ◽  
N. Tsimenides ◽  
A. Eleftheriou

2012 ◽  
Vol 82 (1) ◽  
pp. 263-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Shimose ◽  
H. Watanabe ◽  
T. Tanabe ◽  
T. Kubodera

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document