Clinical outcome of sorafenib treatment in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma refractory to hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy

2013 ◽  
Vol 28 (12) ◽  
pp. 1834-1841 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daisuke Miyaki ◽  
Hiroshi Aikata ◽  
Hiromi Kan ◽  
Hatsue Fujino ◽  
Ayako Urabe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Hepatic Arterial Infusion ◽  
Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Arterial Infusion ◽  
Sorafenib Treatment ◽  
Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy ◽  
Infusion Chemotherapy

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy after sorafenib treatment in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma who are unfit for regorafenib.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 355-355
Author(s):  
Takeshi Terashima ◽  
Tatsuya Yamashita ◽  
Noboru Takata ◽  
Kuniaki Arai ◽  
Eishiro Mizukoshi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Hepatic Arterial Infusion ◽  
Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Arterial Infusion ◽  
Sorafenib Treatment ◽  
Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy ◽  
Infusion Chemotherapy

355 Background: The RESORCE trial proved survival benefit of regorafenib on advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) in the limiting cohort. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) as second-line treatment in patients with aHCC who are unfit for regorafenib. Methods: We studied consecutive 159 patients with aHCC treated with sorafenib in our institution from June 2009 to March 2018. We divided them into two groups according to the eligibility for RESORCE trial (Rego or non-Rego group) and investigated the efficacy of HAIC as post-sorafenib treatment. Moreover, we also analyzed the prognostic factors in each group. Results: When sorafenib treatment failed, 63 patients (39.6%) fulfilled key inclusion criteria of the RESORCE trial and were considered as fit for regorafenib treatment (Rego group). Among 96 remaining patients (non-Rego group), 34 patients (35.4%) were treated with HAIC after sorafenib. The objective response and the median progression-free survival of HAIC were 38.2% and 3.9 months, which were independent of the efficacy or treatment duration of sorafenib. The median survival of HAIC after sorafenib was 11.3 months which was significantly longer than that of 62 patients without HAIC (4.7 months; P = 0.023). Four factors, HAIC (HR 0.516), Child-Pugh A (HR 0.362), tumor size ≥35mm (HR 1.959), and AFP ≥200 (HR 1.728), were identified as independent prognostic factors after sorafenib in multivariate analysis. In Rego group, 14 patients were actually treated with regorafenib and their survival after sorafenib was longer than that of the patients without regorafenib and with HAIC (P < 0.01 and P < 0.01, respectively). In Rego group, regorafenib (HR 0.152), extrahepatic lesions (HR 2.160), and ≥10 intra-hepatic lesions (HR 2.099) were identified as prognostic factors after sorafenib in multivariate analysis. Conclusions: HAIC showed promising tumor response and patients’ outcome for the patients who are unfit for regorafenib. Further investigation is needed to compare HAIC with ramucirumab, cabozantinib or nivolumab.

scholarly journals Clinical Benefits of Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 1882
Author(s):  
Takahiro Yamasaki ◽  
Issei Saeki ◽  
Yurika Kotoh-Yamauchi ◽  
Ryo Sasaki ◽  
Norikazu Tanabe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Vascular Invasion ◽  
Hepatic Arterial Infusion ◽  
Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Arterial Infusion ◽  
Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy ◽  
Infusion Chemotherapy ◽  
Recent Success ◽  
Clinical Benefits

Recent success of systemic therapeutic agents, including combination immunotherapy, could promote a change in the treatment strategy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Although hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) is a treatment option for advanced HCC in Japan, it is not recommended by other guidelines. We discuss the clinical benefits of HAIC compared to sorafenib. The clinical benefits of HAIC are as follows: (1) even a patient with Child–Pugh B HCC (7 or 8 points) is a candidate for HAIC (2) Child–Pugh scores barely decline with the use of HAIC compared with sorafenib (3) HAIC is highly effective in patients with vascular invasion compared with sorafenib; and (4) survival in patients receiving HAIC may not be associated with skeletal muscle volume. In contrast, the disadvantages are problems related with the reservoir system. HAIC has clinical benefits in a subpopulation of patients without extrahepatic metastasis with Child–Pugh A HCC and vascular invasion (especially primary branch invasion or main portal vein invasion) or with Child–Pugh B HCC.

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma by placing a temporary catheter via the subclavian route

2007 ◽  
Vol 48 (7) ◽  
pp. 734-740 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huei-Lung Liang ◽  
Jer-Shyung Huang ◽  
Yi-Huei Lin ◽  
Kwok-Hung Lai ◽  
Chien-Fang Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Hepatic Arterial Infusion ◽  
Catheter Placement ◽  
Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Arterial Infusion ◽  
Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy ◽  
Advanced Hcc ◽  
Infusion Chemotherapy

Background: A permanent reservoir implantation is considered mandatory for hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Since treatment sessions of HAIC may be limited for these end-staged patients, a simple alternative technique for this treatment is desirable. Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility of placing a temporary catheter for HAIC in advanced HCC patients. Material and Methods: 25 advanced HCC patients underwent HAIC with drugs delivered from a temporary catheter which was placed percutaneously by puncturing the left subclavian artery under ultrasound guidance. A course of chemotherapy consisted of five consecutive daily infusions of 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, mitomycin C, and leucovorin. The catheter was removed on the 6th day. Therapy was repeated every 4–6 weeks with maximal number of courses of up to six. The total courses of HAIC in each patient, the catheter-placed-related complications, tumor response rate, and median survival of the patients were registered. Results: A total of 77 courses of HAIC were performed with 100% technical success of catheter placement (1–6 courses in each patient, average 3.1 courses). The overall response rate was 20%, with complete response in two patients and partial response in three patients. Eleven (55%) of the 20 non-responders died within 5 months (mean HAIC, two courses). None of the patients experienced complications such as catheter occlusion, hepatic arterial thrombosis, cerebral infarction, or local infection. Conclusion: With fewer catheter-related complications, HAIC by temporary catheter placement via subclavian puncture could be a treatment option.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document