Effect of large instrument use on shaping ability and debris extrusion of rotary and reciprocating systems

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elielton L. Costa ◽  
Emílio C. Sponchiado‐Júnior ◽  
Lucas F. R. Garcia ◽  
André A. F. Marques
2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (9) ◽  
pp. 3189-3194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camila Galletti Espir ◽  
Camila Almeida Nascimento-Mendes ◽  
Juliane Maria Guerreiro-Tanomaru ◽  
Bruno Cavalini Cavenago ◽  
Marco Antonio Hungaro Duarte ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 207-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge Rubio ◽  
José Ignacio Zarzao ◽  
Antonio Pallarés

2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Pompermayer JARDINE ◽  
Ricardo Abreu da ROSA ◽  
Manuela Favarin SANTINI ◽  
Ivana Maria ZACCARA ◽  
Marcus Vinicius Reis SÓ ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 488-492
Author(s):  
María J. Burbano Balseca ◽  
Silvana B. Terán Ayala ◽  
Fábio D. da Costa Aznar ◽  
Adriana R. de Freitas-Aznar ◽  
Guillermo M. Aguirre Balseca ◽  
...  

Introduction: The extrusion of apical detritus during the retracting procedure is very important, as, besides eliminating materials of radicular obturation, aggressive agents and products such as the remains of dentin taken out, and microorganisms are generally located in tissue around the roots, producing undesired effects, such as inflammation, acute pain, post-operatory pain and delays in the periapical treatment. Objective: To determine the amount of apically extruded detritus using rotary and reciprocating retreatment systems. Methodology: An experimental comparative study as conducted in which 40 single-rooted human first premolars were analyzed. The instruments used were ProTaper Universal files up to F3 and sodium hypochlorite, and the sealing was made through the hybrid technique Tager. They were then kept at 37ºC and 100% of humidity for 15 days so that the sealing material would seal. For the retracting procedure, experimental tubes previously weighted were used. The sample was divided randomly into two groups of 20 pieces. Group A: ProTaper R, and group B: Reciproc. Then, the irrigating material (distilled water) was evaporated from the tubes for 12 hours in a stove at 105ºC, and the experimental tubes were weighted in an analytical precision weighing scale 10-5g. The data was analyzed through the T Student with a significance level of 5%. Results: Results indicated that groups A and B, retreatment with rotational ProTaper R and reciprocating retreatment system (Reciproc) showed a similar difference of initial and final weights, indicating similar apical extrusion of detritus. Conclusion: Both systems extruded a similar amount of detritus during the retreatment procedures.


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 101-105
Author(s):  
Kadam Krutika Kiran ◽  
Vagarali Hemant ◽  
Pujar Madhu A ◽  
Tamase Aishwarya S ◽  
Sahana Umesh

This study aimed to compare the canal transportation and canal centering ability in the preparation of curved root canals after instrumentation with TruNatomy (TN) (TN; Dentsply Sirona, Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) and ProTaper Gold (PG) (PG; Dentsply, Tulsa Dental Specialties, Tulsa, OK, USA) files using cone‑beam computed tomography (CBCT). 30 Single rooted extracted human teeth with root curvature ranging from 20-30° according to Schneider’s method were selected. Teeth with any visible cracks or fractures, calcifications, previous root canal treatments were excluded. The teeth were randomly assigned into two groups i.e. Group 1-TN and Group 2-PG (n = 15 each). The teeth were instrumented according to manufacturer’s guidelines for both the groups. Canals were scanned using a CBCT scanner before and after preparation to evaluate the transportation and centering ratio at 3 mm, 5 mm, and 7 mm from the apex. The data analysis was done using SPSS software and the test used was independent sample t test for comparison between the 2 groups.Data obtained suggested that TN group presented lesser canal transportation at the middle third of the root. The PG group showed better centering abitily at apical third of the root canal when both the groups were compared. TN resulted in less transportation than PG at the middle third, and PG showed better centering ability at the apical third. Overall, both systems safely prepared root canals, causing minimal errors.


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 214-217
Author(s):  
Jamileh Ghoddusi ◽  
Ehsan Arian ◽  
Maryam Golmohammadi ◽  
Maryam Gharechahi ◽  
Siavash Moushekhian

Background. The present in vitro study aimed to compare the effectiveness of the WaveOne and ProTaper Gold systems in removing the Enterococcus faecalis biofilm. Methods. Thirty-eight mandibular premolars were selected. The root canals were assigned to standard control (canals serially enlarged with ProTaper Gold S1-S2-F1-F2, n=15) and experimental (canals enlarged with Primary WaveOne file, n=15) groups. Following the instrumentation procedure, the root canals underwent a sampling procedure, and the colonyforming unit (CFU) counts were determined. The samples were also evaluated under a fluorescent microscope to evaluate viable bacteria. The data were analyzed using independent samples t test and paired samples t test. Results. The results showed that, compared with the ProTaper group, the WaveOne group exhibited the least viable bacteria (P=0.004). Conclusion. It was concluded that comparison with the ProTaper Gold rotary system, the WaveOne reciprocating file is more successful in reducing intratubular viable bacteria counts.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document