How Does the Facilitation Effort of Clinical Educators Interact With Aspects of Organizational Context to Affect Research Use in Long‐term Care? Evidence From CHAID Analysis

Author(s):  
TKT Lo ◽  
Sheila A. Boamah ◽  
Jeffrey W. Poss ◽  
Gary F. Teare ◽  
Peter G. Norton ◽  
...  
BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. e020074
Author(s):  
T K T Lo ◽  
Matthias Hoben ◽  
Peter G Norton ◽  
Gary F Teare ◽  
Carole A Estabrooks

ObjectiveThis study explored the effect of clinical educators as facilitators of research use and how it may be modified by organisational context in the settings.DesignCross-sectional observational study.SettingA representative sample of 91 residential long-term care (LTC) facilities across Western Canada.ParticipantsWe used surveys to collect data from the frontline care aides and information about the organisational context of the care units.Outcome measure and explanatory variablesWe assessed research use (the outcome) with the Conceptual Research Utilization (CRU) scale. Explanatory variables in the multiple regression analysis were facilitation, organisational context and the interaction terms. Facilitation was measured by the frequency of contacts between care aides and clinical educator or person who brings new ideas about resident care. Three core organisational context variables were measured using the Alberta Context Tool.ResultsWe included data of 3873 care aides from 294 care units in the LTC facilities. We found significant associations between CRU and facilitation, leadership, culture and evaluation. Interactions of facilitation x leadership and facilitation x culture were negative. The coefficient of the facilitation x evaluation term in the regression model was positive (0.019, 95% CI 0.012 to 0.026), suggesting synergistic effects between facilitation and a well-developed process to evaluate care quality using relevant data.ConclusionsFindings indicate clinical educators are effective facilitators of research use among the care aides, but the effect is modified by organisational context. For greatest impact, managers can direct efforts of the clinical educators to care units where leadership and culture ratings are lowest, but a proficient feedback and evaluation process is in place. This understanding enables managers to deploy clinical educators (a scarce resource in LTC settings) most efficiently.


2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias Hoben ◽  
Marion Bär ◽  
Cornelia Mahler ◽  
Sarah Berger ◽  
Janet E Squires ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S821-S821
Author(s):  
Kaitlyn C Tate ◽  
Colin Reid ◽  
Patrick McLane ◽  
Garnet E Cummings ◽  
Brian H Rowe ◽  
...  

Abstract Studies examining risk of death during acute care transitions have highlighted potential predictors of death during transition. However, they have not closely examined the relationships and directional effects of organizational context, care processes, resident demographics and health conditions on death during transition. By employing structural equation modeling, we aimed to 1) identify predictive factors for residents who died during transitions from long term care (LTC) to emergency departments (EDs) and back; 2) examine relationships between identified organizational, process and resident factors with resident death during these transitions; and 3) identify areas for further investigation and improvement in practice. We tracked every resident transfer from 38 participating LTC facilities to two included EDs in two Western Canadian provinces from July 2011 to July 2012. Overall, 524 residents were involved in 637 transfers of whom 63 residents (12%) died during the transition. Sustained dyspnea (in both LTC and the ED), sustained change in level of consciousness (LOC) and severity measured by triage score were direct and significant predictors of resident death during transition. The model fit the data, (x2 = 83.77, df = 64, p = 0.049) and explained 15% variance in resident death. Dyspnea and change in LOC in both LTC and ED needs to be recognized regardless of primary reason for transfer. More research is needed to determine the specific influences of LTC ownership models, family involvement in decision-making, LTC staff decision-making on resident death during transition, and interventions to prevent pre-death transfers.


Health ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 04 (09) ◽  
pp. 725-734 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jill Marcella ◽  
Jayanthini Nadarajah ◽  
Mary Lou Kelley ◽  
George A. Heckman ◽  
Sharon Kaasalainen ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 224-224
Author(s):  
Bram de Boer ◽  
Matheus van Achterberg ◽  
Jan Hamers ◽  
Hilde Verbeek ◽  
Amal Fakha

Abstract Many transitional care innovations (TCI) are implemented to improve long-term care services for older persons during the transition between various care settings. Nevertheless, multiple contextual factors (barriers; facilitators) influence the implementation of TCI at different levels such as but not limited to the organizational environment, outer setting, or innovation’s characteristics. By conducting a modified Delphi study involving 29 international experts from 10 countries, eleven influencing factors were prioritized and agreed upon (with ≥ 85% consensus level) as the most important for implementing TCI. These top factors were linked mostly to the organizational setting (e.g. resources, financing) or the implementation process (e.g. engaging key stakeholders). Moreover, the feasibility to address the majority of these factors with implementation strategies was rated as difficult. Our work concludes a compilation of major factors to be aware of and aim to tackle when preparing to implement a new TCI in any long-term care setting.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 161-161
Author(s):  
Patrick Wachholz ◽  
Paulo José Fortes Villas Boas ◽  
Vivian Schutz ◽  
Michael Lepore ◽  
Deanna Myer ◽  
...  

Abstract The Brazilian long-term care (LTC) sector remains poorly structured and underdeveloped. COVID-19 did not bring unprecedented focus to the sector just because of the high mortality; it also affected the quality of care. In this pilot study, we evaluated the perspectives toward WE-THRIVE LTC measurements from Brazilian frontline workers in five long-term care facilities. For the four WE-THRIVE domains of LTC measurement (workforce and staffing, person-centered care, organizational context, and care outcomes), respondents used a 4-point Likert scale to rate their importance and answered open-ended questions about how these aspects of care changed since COVID-19. With few exceptions, respondents rated these aspects of LTC as extremely important or very important. Qualitative results highlighted concerns about and impacts of COVID-19, such as challenges related to the isolation of residents. The assessed measurement domains are confirmed to be important by frontline staff in Brazil. Measurement adoption must account for current issues.


Author(s):  
Carole A. Estabrooks ◽  
Stephanie A. Chamberlain

This chapter describes 10 years of research into organizational context in residential long-term care (LTC) settings. It focuses on this book’s first and third questions: What constitutes context for an event, situation, or phenomenon? And how do contexts change, and what is the role of actors in such processes? Although with respect to change, it does not focus as much on secular trends as it does on strategies to improve local context. We explore how context influences use of research by staff, quality-of-life indicators for staff, and ability to improve quality of care and quality of life for LTC residents. First, it describes the development and ongoing use of the Alberta Context Tool. Second, it describes the Translating Research in Elder Care (TREC) program of research, and the LTC setting in which the authors study context to bring about quality improvements. Third, it presents selected empirical findings as evidence that context matters in LTC. Finally, it proposes future directions to understand and modify context for improved quality in LTC.


2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (12) ◽  
pp. 1611-1616.e4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura D. Aloisio ◽  
Wendy A. Gifford ◽  
Katherine S. McGilton ◽  
Michelle Lalonde ◽  
Carole A. Estabrooks ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (9) ◽  
pp. 1185.e9-1185.e18
Author(s):  
Melissa G. Demery Varin ◽  
Dawn Stacey ◽  
Jennifer L. Baumbusch ◽  
Carole Estabrooks ◽  
Janet E. Squires

2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carole A Estabrooks ◽  
Janet E Squires ◽  
Leslie Hayduk ◽  
Debra Morgan ◽  
Greta G Cummings ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document