6588 Background: Co-existing of BRAF V600E and TERT promoter C228T/C250T mutation has been extensively related to prognosis in thyroid cancer. Our study aimed to establish a more sensitive method for mutation detection and explore the correlation more in-depth. Methods: BRAF and TERT promoter mutation status of 250 papillary thyroid cancer was detected by both Amplification Refractory Mutation System quantitative PCR (ARMS-qPCR) and Sanger sequencing to compare the sensitivity. The associations between the mutation status and the clinicopathological features were analyzed. Results: ARMS-qPCR displayed higher sensitivity than Sanger ( BRAF V600E: 75.2% vs. 52.4%, p< 0.001; TERT promoter C228T/C250T: 12.0% vs. 3.6%, p= 0.001; Co-mutation (9.6% vs. 3.2%, p= 0.005). Both methods indicated that patients with BRAF V600E and TERT promoter co-mutation were higher in age at diagnosis (ARMS-qPCR: 51.0 ± 14.2 vs. 40.2 ± 12.6, p <0.001; Sanger: 64.3 ± 7.1 vs. 40.5 ± 12.6, p <0.001), and the recurrence rate (16.7% vs. 3.1%, p= 0.014; 50.0% vs. 2.9%, p< 0.001), besides, the co-mutation group were related to more advanced TNM stage ( p< 0.001; p< 0.001) and higher MACIS score (5.1 ± 1.5 vs. 4.2 ± 0.7, p= 0.006; 6.6 ± 1.1 vs. 4.2 ± 0.8, p< 0.001). In addition, compared with the co-mutation results of Sanger, it seems that ARMS-qPCR has identified an earlier stage of group, which were younger (43.3 ± 10.1 vs. 66.4 ± 6.1, p< 0.001), and with smaller tumor (1.8 ± 1.5 vs. 4.0 ± 1.3, p= 0.002), as well as lower recurrence rate ( 0.0% vs. 50%, p= 0.007). Besides, the newly identified group were lower in MACIS score (4.2 ± 0.8 vs. 6.9 ± 0.7, p= 0.002) and with lower TNM stage ( p= 0.001). Conclusions: Patients with BRAF V600E and TERT promoter C228T/C250T co-mutation have a worse prognosis. Using ARMS-qPCR, the more sensitive method could identify earlier stages of patients with a potentially worse prognosis. [Table: see text]
TERT Promoter Mutation Status as an Independent Prognostic Factor in Cutaneous Melanoma
