Therapy with ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir plus dasabuvir is effective and safe for the treatment of genotypes 1 and 4 hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in patients with severe renal impairment: A multicentre experience

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 464-471 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Muñoz-Gómez ◽  
D. Rincón ◽  
A. Ahumada ◽  
E. Hernández ◽  
M. J. Devesa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatitis C Virus ◽  
Hepatitis C ◽  
Renal Impairment ◽  
Severe Renal Impairment ◽  
Hcv Infection

scholarly journals The Efficacy and Safety of Sofosbuvir/Daclatasvir Fixed-Dose Combination in Iranian Hemodialysis Patients with Hepatitis C Virus Infection

2021 ◽  
Vol In Press (In Press) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kasra Ghanaat ◽  
Heidar Sharafi ◽  
Seyed Moayed Alavian
Keyword(s):  
Hepatitis C Virus ◽  
Hepatitis C ◽  
Renal Impairment ◽  
Severe Renal Impairment ◽  
Hemodialysis Patients ◽  
Virologic Response ◽  
Hcv Infection ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Patient Reported

Background: Although several regimens have been approved for the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, sofosbuvir-based regimens are not approved for the treatment of HCV infection in patients with severe renal impairment. Methods: This study was conducted on 51 hemodialysis patients infected with HCV. The patients received a constant dose of sofosbuvir/daclatasvir (SOF/DCV). Sustained virologic response (SVR) was evaluated 12 weeks after completion of treatment. The subjects were selected and treated with a combination of SOF/DCV. Eleven patients expired during the anti-HCV treatment due to causes not related to liver disease or antiviral therapy. Results: Finally, 40 patients finished the treatment, and 36 cases were evaluated for SVR. Among those tested for SVR, 35 (97.2%, 95% CI: 85.5 - 99.9%) achieved SVR and one (2.8%, 95% CI: 0.1 - 14.5%) relapsed. No patient reported severe adverse events. Conclusions: The combination of SOF/DCV showed great efficacy and safety in hemodialysis patients with severe renal impairment and chronic HCV infection.

scholarly journals Effects of Renal Impairment and Hemodialysis on the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of the Glecaprevir and Pibrentasvir Combination in Hepatitis C Virus-Negative Subjects

2017 ◽  
Vol 62 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew P. Kosloski ◽  
Weihan Zhao ◽  
Thomas C. Marbury ◽  
Richard A. Preston ◽  
Michael G. Collins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Kidney Disease ◽  
Renal Function ◽  
Hepatitis C Virus ◽  
Hepatitis C ◽  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Renal Impairment ◽  
Combined Treatment ◽  
Hcv Infection ◽  
Renal Elimination ◽  
Genotype 2

ABSTRACT Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is an independent risk factor for developing chronic renal impairment and end-stage renal disease. Limited treatment options are available for HCV genotype 2, 3, 5, and 6 infections in patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of <30 ml/min. Glecaprevir and pibrentasvir are active against all six major HCV genotypes, are primarily excreted in the bile, and have minimal renal elimination. Therefore, combined treatment with these direct-acting antivirals may be useful for patients with HCV infection and chronic kidney disease. A phase 1, multicenter, open-label study evaluated the effects of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics and safety of glecaprevir-pibrentasvir. In substudy 1, 38 subjects with stage 2 to 5 chronic kidney disease who were not on dialysis or who had normal renal function received single doses of the combination of 300 mg glecaprevir and 120 mg pibrentasvir. In substudy 2, 8 subjects requiring hemodialysis received single doses of the combination of 300 mg glecaprevir and 120 mg pibrentasvir under dialysis and nondialysis conditions. Regression analyses demonstrated increased glecaprevir and pibrentasvir plasma exposures, as determined by the area under the curve, with decreasing renal function, up to 56% and 46%, respectively, in subjects with an eGFR of <15 ml/min/1.73 m 2 . In dialysis-dependent subjects, glecaprevir and pibrentasvir exposures were similar (≤18% difference) when study drugs were administered before hemodialysis or on a nondialysis day. Adverse events were mostly mild, with the most common being self-limited fatigue (3 subjects). The study findings support the clinical evaluation of glecaprevir-pibrentasvir without dose adjustment in HCV-infected subjects with renal impairment. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration number NCT02442258.)

Glecaprevir/pibrentasvir for patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection and severe renal impairment

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 568-575 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chen‐Hua Liu ◽  
Sheng‐Shun Yang ◽  
Cheng‐Yuan Peng ◽  
Woan‐Tyy Lin ◽  
Chun‐Jen Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Hepatitis ◽  
Hepatitis C Virus ◽  
Hepatitis C ◽  
Virus Infection ◽  
Renal Impairment ◽  
Chronic Hepatitis C ◽  
Severe Renal Impairment ◽  
Hepatitis C Virus Infection ◽  
Chronic Hepatitis C Virus

Direct-acting Antivirals for Hepatitis C Virus in Patients on Maintenance Dialysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 40 (10) ◽  
pp. 531-541 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabrizio Fabrizi ◽  
Francesca M. Donato ◽  
Piergiorgio Messa
Keyword(s):  
Hepatitis C Virus ◽  
Hepatitis C ◽  
Severe Renal Impairment ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Hcv Infection ◽  
Direct Acting Antivirals ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Maintenance Dialysis ◽  
Chronic Hcv ◽  
Direct Acting

The frequency of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection remains high in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and plays a detrimental role in mortality in this population. According to the latest survey, the adjusted hazard ratio for HCV-positive versus HCV-negative patients on long-term dialysis was 1.12 (95% CI, 1.05 to 1.20) and 1.10 (95% CI, 0.98 to 1.22) for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, respectively. An impairment on quality of life has also been documented in HCV-infected patients undergoing regular dialysis. Most clinicians have been so far reluctant to treat hepatitis C in patients with advanced CKD, due to concerns regarding low efficacy and safety of interferon-based regimens. The advent of all-oral, direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) has revolutionized treatment paradigms for HCV, including patients with other comorbidities such as CKD. Two combinations of DAAs have been recently approved for the treatment of HCV in advanced CKD: elbasvir/grazoprevir (evaluated in 1 randomized controlled trial) and ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir/dasabuvir with or without ribavirin (examined in some observational, single-arm studies). These antiviral combinations have provided high safety and efficacy (SVR12 rates >90%) in HCV-infected patients with stage 4–5 CKD. Sofosbuvir, a nucleotide analogue inhibitor of the HCV NS5B polymerase, is the cornerstone of most anti-HCV current regimens but is not currently recommended for patients with severe renal insufficiency (eGFR <30 mL/min per 1.73 m2). However, several small-sized studies have been published on the safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir-based regimens for patients with hepatitis C on maintenance dialysis>; overall, the viral response was satisfactory (SVR12 rates ranging between 58% and 100%) with a few drug-related drop-outs. Studies are in progress to assess whether ribavirin-free antiviral combinations with novel DAAs are a viable option for patients with severe renal impairment and chronic HCV infection.

scholarly journals Use of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection and severe renal impairment

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 554-561
Author(s):  
Desmond Y. H. Yap ◽  
Kevin S. H. Liu ◽  
Yu-Chun Hsu ◽  
Grace L. H. Wong ◽  
Ming-Chang Tsai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Hepatitis ◽  
Hepatitis C Virus ◽  
Hepatitis C ◽  
Renal Impairment ◽  
Chronic Hepatitis C ◽  
Severe Renal Impairment ◽  
Asian Patients ◽  
Chronic Hepatitis C Virus ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Lost To Follow Up

Background/Aims: Data on treatment efficacy and safety of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB) for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in Asian patients with severe renal impairment are limited. This study aimed to study the treatment and side effects of GLE/PIB in these patients infected with non-1 genotype (GT) HCV.Methods: We prospectively recruited patients with Child’s A cirrhosis and eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> in Hong Kong and Taiwan during 2017–2018 to receive GLE/PIB treatment.Results: Twenty-one patients (GT2, n=7; GT3, n=6; and GT6, n=8) received GLE/PIB for 11.2±1.8 weeks. All except one were treatment-naïve. GLE/PIB was initiated in 16 patients while on dialysis (seven on peritoneal dialysis [PD] and nine on hemodialysis) and in five patients before dialysis. One patient died of PD-related peritonitis during treatment and two were lost to follow up. The SVR12 rate in the remaining 18 patients was 100%. All patients achieved undetectable levels at 4-, 12-, 24- and 48-week after treatment. Patients with deranged alanine aminotransferase showed normalization after 4 weeks and the response was sustained for 48 weeks. No significant adverse event was observed.Conclusions: GLE/PIB treatment was associated with high efficacy and tolerability in HCV-infected patients with severe renal impairment.

New and Emerging Evidence on the Use of Second-Generation Direct Acting Antivirals for the Treatment of Hepatitis C Virus in Renal Impairment

2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 359-365 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria A. Sorbera ◽  
Michelle L. Friedman ◽  
Rebecca Cope
Keyword(s):  
Hepatitis C Virus ◽  
Hepatitis C ◽  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Renal Impairment ◽  
Second Generation ◽  
Severe Renal Impairment ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Uncertain Data ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
Direct Acting

Due to the intimate relationship between liver and kidney disease in hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, treatment options for HCV-positive patients at any stage of chronic kidney disease (CKD) are essential. The availability of second-generation, direct-acting antiviral (DAA) combinations has allowed for the advent of interferon-sparing treatment regimens with shorter durations and minimal side effects. While many of the second-generation DAAs are principally metabolized by the hepatic system, dosing in severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance [CrCl] <30 mL/min) or dialysis has remained questionable due to limited experience. New evidence regarding the use of these agents in renal impairment continues to become available, as real-world experience with these treatment regimens is reported. Simeprevir, ledipasvir, paritaprevir, ombitasvir, dasabuvir, and daclatasvir have data to suggest safety in end-stage renal disease. While safety and efficacy with sofosbuvir remains uncertain, data are now available to support utilizing a dose adjustment when glomerular filtration rates are <30 mL/min. Upcoming regimens grazoprevir/elbasvir and daclatasvir/asunaprevir/beclavubir may provide further options for patients with advanced kidney disease, and ongoing studies will continue to provide guidance for this unique patient population. This article will review the currently available literature, including the newest emerging evidence, on the use of second-generation DAAs in CKD stages 3 to 5 and dialysis.

scholarly journals Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Ribavirin in Hepatitis C Virus-Infected Patients with Various Degrees of Renal Impairment

2013 ◽  
Vol 57 (12) ◽  
pp. 6097-6105 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. J. Brennan ◽  
K. Wang ◽  
S. Blotner ◽  
M. O. Magnusson ◽  
J. J. Wilkins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Function ◽  
Hepatitis C Virus ◽  
Hepatitis C ◽  
Renal Impairment ◽  
Normal Renal Function ◽  
Impaired Renal Function ◽  
Severe Renal Impairment ◽  
Moderate Renal Impairment ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Time Curve

ABSTRACTRibavirin (RBV) is an integral part of standard-of-care hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatments and many future regimens under investigation. The pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and tolerability of RBV in chronically HCV-infected patients with renal impairment are not well defined and were the focus of an open-label PK study in HCV-infected patients receiving RBV plus pegylated interferon. Serial RBV plasma samples were collected over 12 h on day 1 of weeks 1 and 12 from patients with moderate renal impairment (creatinine clearance [CLCR], 30 to 50 ml/min; RBV, 600 mg daily), severe renal impairment (CLCR, <30 ml/min; RBV, 400 mg daily), end-stage renal disease (ESRD) (RBV, 200 mg daily), or normal renal function (CLCR, >80 ml/min; RBV, 800 to 1,200 mg daily). Of the 44 patients, 9 had moderately impaired renal function, 10 had severely impaired renal function, 13 had ESRD, and 12 had normal renal function. The RBV dose was reduced because of adverse events (AEs) in 71% and 53% of severe and moderate renal impairment groups, respectively. Despite this modification, patients with moderate and severe impairment had 12-hour (area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 h [AUC0–12]) values 36% (38,452 ng · h/ml) and 25% (35,101 ng · h/ml) higher, respectively, than those with normal renal function (28,192 ng · h/ml). Patients with ESRD tolerated a 200-mg daily dose, and AUC0–12was 20% lower (22,629 ng · h/ml) than in patients with normal renal function. PK modeling and simulation (M&S) indicated that doses of 200 mg or 400 mg alternating daily for patients with moderate renal impairment and 200 mg daily for patients with severe renal impairment were the most appropriate dose regimens in these patients.

Sofosbuvir/velpatasvir with or without low-dose ribavirin for patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection and severe renal impairment

Gut ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. gutjnl-2020-323569
Author(s):  
Chen-Hua Liu ◽  
Chi-Yi Chen ◽  
Wei-Wen Su ◽  
Kuo-Chih Tseng ◽  
Ching-Chu Lo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Hepatitis ◽  
Hepatitis C Virus ◽  
Liver Disease ◽  
Hepatitis C ◽  
Renal Impairment ◽  
Chronic Hepatitis C ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Severe Renal Impairment ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
Chronic Hepatitis C Virus

ObjectiveData regarding the real-world effectiveness and safety of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) with or without low-dose ribavirin (RBV) in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and severe renal impairment (RI) are limited. We evaluated the performance of SOF/VEL with or without low-dose RBV in HCV-infected patients with chronic kidney disease stage 4 or 5.Design191 patients with compensated (n=181) and decompensated (n=10) liver diseases receiving SOF/VEL (400/100 mg/day) alone and SOF/VEL with low-dose RBV (200 mg/day) for 12 weeks were retrospectively recruited at 15 academic centres in Taiwan. The effectiveness was determined by sustained virological response at off-treatment week 12 (SVR12) in evaluable (EP) and per-protocol populations (PP). The safety profiles were assessed.ResultsThe SVR12 rates by EP and PP analyses were 94.8% (95% CI 90.6% to 97.1%) and 100% (95% CI 97.9% to 100%). In patients with compensated liver disease, the SVR12 rates were 95.0% and 100% by EP and PP analyses. In patients with decompensated liver disease, the SVR12 rates were 90.0% and 100% by EP and PP analyses. Ten patients who failed to achieve SVR12 were attributed to non-virological failures. Among the 20 serious adverse events (AEs), none were judged related to SOF/VEL or RBV. The AEs occurring in ≥10% included fatigue (14.7%), headache (14.1%), nausea (12.6%), insomnia (12.0%) and pruritus (10.5%). None had ≥grade 3 total bilirubin or alanine aminotransferase elevations.ConclusionSOF/VEL with or without low-dose RBV is effective and well-tolerated in HCV-infected patients with severe RI.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document