scholarly journals Effectiveness of vibratory stimulation on needle‐related procedural pain in children

2021 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Procedural Pain ◽  
Vibratory Stimulation

Effectiveness of vibratory stimulation on needle-related procedural pain in children

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (7) ◽  
pp. 1428-1463
Author(s):  
Shingo Ueki ◽  
Yuki Yamagami ◽  
Kiyoko Makimoto
Keyword(s):  
Procedural Pain ◽  
Vibratory Stimulation

Effectiveness of vibratory stimulation on needle-related procedural pain in children

2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 825-830 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shingo Ueki ◽  
Yuki Yamagami ◽  
Kiyoko Makimoto
Keyword(s):  
Procedural Pain ◽  
Vibratory Stimulation

EFFICACY OF SUCROSE AS ANALGESIA FOR PROCEDURAL PAIN IN NEONATES

2002 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 93-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
MARILYN M. BENIS
Keyword(s):  
Procedural Pain

scholarly journals Percutaneous nephrostomy versus retrograde ureteral stenting for acute upper obstructive uropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ismail Zul Khairul Azwadi ◽  
Mohd Noor Norhayati ◽  
Mohd Shafie Abdullah
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Obstructive Uropathy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Percutaneous Nephrostomy ◽  
Procedural Pain ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Failure Rates ◽  
Ureteral Stenting

AbstractAcute obstructive uropathy is associated with significant morbidity among patients with any condition that leads to urinary tract obstruction. Immediate urinary diversion is necessary to prevent further damage to the kidneys. In many centres, the two main treatment options include percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) and retrograde ureteral stenting (RUS). The purpose of this study if to compare the efficacy and safety of PCN and RUS for the treatment of acute obstructive uropathy. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, the World Health Organisation International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov. We also searched the reference lists of included studies to identify any additional trials. We included randomised controlled trials and controlled clinical trials comparing the outcomes of clinical improvement (septic parameters), hospitalisation duration, quality of life, urinary-related symptoms, failure rates, post-procedural pain [measured using a visual analogue scale (VAS)] and analgesics use. We conducted statistical analyses using random effects models and expressed the results as risk ratio (RR) and risk difference (RD) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Seven trials were identified that included 667 patients. Meta-analysis of the data revealed no difference in the two methods in improvement of septic parameters, quality of life, failure rates, post-procedural pain (VAS), or analgesics use. Patients receiving PCN had lower rates of haematuria and dysuria post-operatively and longer hospitalisation duration than those receiving RUS. PCN and RUS are effective for the decompression of an obstructed urinary system, with no significant difference in most outcomes. However, PCN is preferable to RUS because of its reduced impact on the patient’s post-operative quality of life due to haematuria and dysuria, although it is associated with slightly longer hospitalisation duration.

Methadone effectively attenuates acute and long-term consequences of neonatal repetitive procedural pain in a rat model

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nynke J. van den Hoogen ◽  
Thomas J. de Geus ◽  
Jacob Patijn ◽  
Dick Tibboel ◽  
Elbert A. Joosten
Keyword(s):  
Rat Model ◽  
Procedural Pain ◽  
Long Term Consequences

scholarly journals Massage therapy as a non-pharmacological analgesia for procedural pain in neonates: A scoping review

2021 ◽  
pp. 102735
Author(s):  
Siti Yuyun Rahayu Fitri ◽  
Khadidjah Siti ◽  
Nurhidayah Ikeu ◽  
Nenden Nur Asriyani Maryam
Keyword(s):  
Scoping Review ◽  
Massage Therapy ◽  
Procedural Pain

scholarly journals Hypnotherapy for Procedural Pain and Distress in Children: A scoping Review Protocol

Pain Medicine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daly Geagea ◽  
Zephanie Tyack ◽  
Roy Kimble ◽  
Lars Eriksson ◽  
Vince Polito ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Scoping Review ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Procedural Pain ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Theoretical Frameworks ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Pharmacological Agents ◽  
Review Protocol ◽  
Meta Analyses

Abstract Objective Inadequately treated pain and distress elicited by medical procedures can put children at higher risks of acute and chronic biopsychosocial sequelae. Children can benefit from hypnotherapy, a psychological tailored intervention, as an adjunct to pharmacological agents to address the multiple components of pain and distress. Despite providing evidence on the effectiveness and potential superiority of hypnotherapy to other psychological interventions, research on hypnotherapy for paediatric procedural pain and distress has been predominantly limited to oncology and needle procedures. Plus, there is a lack of reporting of intervention manuals, factors influencing hypnotic responding, pain unpleasantness outcomes, theoretical frameworks, adverse events, as well as barriers and facilitators to the feasibility of delivering the intervention and study procedures. The proposed review aims to map the range and nature of the evidence on hypnotherapy for procedural pain and distress in children to identify gaps in literature and areas requiring further investigation. Methods This review will follow the Arksey and O'Malley (2005) methodology and incorporate additional scoping review recommendations by The Joanna Briggs Institute and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses. Relevant studies will be identified through searching published literature databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus and Web of Science) and grey literature in addition to hand-searching of reference lists and key journals. Two authors will independently screen titles and abstracts of search results followed by full-texts review against eligibility criteria. Conclusion Findings are anticipated to guide future research and inform the development of tailored hypnotic interventions in children.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document