Psychometric properties of a Thai version of the Richards‐Campbell sleep questionnaire

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nuanprae Kitisin ◽  
Pawit Somnuke ◽  
Napat Thikom ◽  
Nattaya Raykateeraroj ◽  
Nisa Poontong ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 451-458 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sachiko Shimizu ◽  
Kumi Kato-Nishimura ◽  
Ikuko Mohri ◽  
Kuriko Kagitani-Shimono ◽  
Masaya Tachibana ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 362-368 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li‐xia Chen ◽  
Dai‐hong Ji ◽  
Feng Zhang ◽  
Jian‐hua Li ◽  
Li Cui ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus Jansson-Fröjmark ◽  
Allison G. Harvey ◽  
Lars-Gunnar Lundh ◽  
Annika Norell-Clarke ◽  
Steven J. Linton

2019 ◽  
Vol 123 (3) ◽  
pp. 966-982
Author(s):  
Markus Jansson-Fröjmark ◽  
Rikard Sunnhed

Aim The purpose of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of two brief versions of previously validated cognitive process measures in insomnia: the Anxiety and Preoccupation about Sleep Questionnaire and the Sleep-Associated Monitoring Index. Methods Two samples (168 students and 219 patients with insomnia disorder) completed original and brief versions of the two measures (Anxiety and Preoccupation about Sleep Questionnaire-Brief version and Sleep-Associated Monitoring Index-Brief version). Also, they filled out sociodemographic questions, sleep items, and the Insomnia Severity Index. Results In both samples, the internal consistencies of the two brief versions were acceptable at α = .70 to.72. The correlations between the original and brief versions were significant at .79 to .82. The two brief versions were also significantly associated with insomnia severity and nighttime symptomatology. In the student sample, those with likely insomnia disorder (14.9% of the sample) scored significantly higher on the two brief versions, relative to those without insomnia. Conclusion The two brief versions, Anxiety and Preoccupation about Sleep Questionnaire-Brief version and Sleep-Associated Monitoring Index-Brief version, displayed acceptable psychometric properties. This implies that the two brief versions might be viable alternatives for use in clinical and research settings.


2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmadali Amirifar ◽  
Abolfazl Rahimi ◽  
Fakhrudin Feizi ◽  
Masoud Sirati nir

2011 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 2467-2479 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anneke P.H.M. Maas ◽  
Robert Didden ◽  
Hubert Korzilius ◽  
Wiebe Braam ◽  
Philippe Collin ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Ling-Yu Guo ◽  
Phyllis Schneider ◽  
William Harrison

Purpose This study provided reference data and examined psychometric properties for clausal density (CD; i.e., number of clauses per utterance) in children between ages 4 and 9 years from the database of the Edmonton Narrative Norms Instrument (ENNI). Method Participants in the ENNI database included 300 children with typical language (TL) and 77 children with language impairment (LI) between the ages of 4;0 (years;months) and 9;11. Narrative samples were collected using a story generation task, in which children were asked to tell stories based on six picture sequences. CD was computed from the narrative samples. The split-half reliability, concurrent criterion validity, and diagnostic accuracy were evaluated for CD by age. Results CD scores increased significantly between ages 4 and 9 years in children with TL and those with LI. Children with TL produced higher CD scores than those with LI at each age level. In addition, the correlation coefficients for the split-half reliability and concurrent criterion validity of CD scores were all significant at each age level, with the magnitude ranging from small to large. The diagnostic accuracy of CD scores, as revealed by sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios, was poor. Conclusions The finding on diagnostic accuracy did not support the use of CD for identifying children with LI between ages 4 and 9 years. However, given the attested reliability and validity for CD, reference data of CD from the ENNI database can be used for evaluating children's difficulties with complex syntax and monitoring their change over time. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.13172129


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document