The social utility of community treatment orders: Applying Girard’s mimetic theory to community‐based mandated mental health care

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fiona Jager ◽  
Amélie Perron
Author(s):  
Tania Gergel ◽  
George Szmukler

The specific context of community mental health care affects the debate surrounding coercion in psychiatry, not by raising radically new questions but by highlighting the complexity of this debate and some of the associated ethical difficulties. This chapter begins by looking at the varying conventional justifications for involuntary treatment and then considers the different mechanisms through which such ‘coercion’ is enforced within the community—from formal compulsion via community treatment orders (CTOs) through to ‘softer’ pressures, such as ‘persuasion’ or ‘interpersonal leverage’. Some commonly accepted ideas surrounding interventions such as ‘incentives’ and ‘threats’ are challenged. The chapter concludes with some broad suggestions as to a how a reformulated ‘decision-making capability and best interests’ approach may be one way to increase the ethical viability of community coercion.


The use of coercion is one of the defining issues of mental health care and has been intensely controversial since the very earliest attempts to contain and treat the mentally ill. The balance between respecting autonomy and ensuring that those who most need treatment and support are provided with it has never been finer, with the ‘move into the community’ in many high-income countries over the last 50 years and the development of community services. The vast majority of patients worldwide now receive mental health care outside hospital, and this trend is increasing. New models of community care, such as assertive community treatment (ACT), have evolved as a result and there are widespread provisions for compulsory treatment in the community in the form of community treatment orders. These legal mechanisms now exist in over 75 jurisdictions worldwide. Many people using community services feel coerced, but at the same time intensive forms of treatment such as ACT, which arguably add pressure to patients to engage in treatment, have been associated with improved outcome. This volume draws together current knowledge about coercive practices worldwide, both those founded in law and those ‘informal’ processes whose coerciveness remains contested. It does so from a variety of perspectives, drawing on diverse disciplines such as history, law, sociology, anthropology, and medicine and for is explored


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanjir Rashid Soron

UNSTRUCTURED Though health and shelter are two basic human rights, millions of refugees around the world are deprived of these basic needs. Moreover, the mental health need is one of least priority issues for the refugees. Bangladesh a developing country in the Southeast Asia where the health system is fragile and the sudden influx of thousands of Rohingya put the system in a more critical situation. It is beyond the capacity of the country to provide the minimum mental health care using existing resource. However, the refuges need immediate and extensive mental health care as the trauma, torture and being uprooted from homeland makes them vulnerable for various mental. Telepsychiatry (using technology for mental health service) opened a new window to provide mental health service for them. Mobile phone opened several options to reach to the refugees, screen them with mobile apps, connect them with self-help apps and system, track their symptoms, provide distance intervention and train the frontline health workers about the primary psychological supports. The social networking sites give the opportunity to connect the refugees with experts, create peer support group and provide interventions. Bangladesh can explore and can use the telepsychiatry to provide mental health service to the rohingya people.


Author(s):  
Anthony J. O’Brien

Oceania is characterized by the diversity of countries and by highly variable provision of mental health services and community mental health care. Countries such as Australian and New Zealand have well-developed mental health services with a high level of provision, but many less developed countries lack mental health infrastructure. Some developing countries such as Samoa and Tonga have passed mental health legislation with provision for community treatment orders, but this legal measure is probably not a useful mechanism for advancing mental health care in developing countries. Instead, efforts to improve provision of care seem best directed to the primary care sector, and to the general health workforce, rather than to specialists. The UN CRPD offer extensions of human rights to people with mental illness and most countries in Oceania have signed it. However, the absence of a regional rights tribunal potentially limits the realization of those rights.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
René Keet ◽  
Marjonneke de Vetten-Mc Mahon ◽  
Laura Shields-Zeeman ◽  
Torleif Ruud ◽  
Jaap van Weeghel ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document