scholarly journals A meta-analysis on growth, physiological, and biochemical responses of woody species to ground-level ozone highlights the role of plant functional types

2017 ◽  
Vol 40 (10) ◽  
pp. 2369-2380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pin Li ◽  
Zhaozhong Feng ◽  
Vicent Catalayud ◽  
Xiangyang Yuan ◽  
Yansen Xu ◽  
...  
2011 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 456-467 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefano Manzoni ◽  
Giulia Vico ◽  
Gabriel Katul ◽  
Philip A. Fay ◽  
Wayne Polley ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giacomo Puglielli ◽  
Lauri Laanisto ◽  
Hendrik Poorter ◽  
Ülo Niinemets

<p>Optimal partitioning theory predicts that plants allocate a greater proportion of biomass to the organs acquiring the most limiting resource when different environments challenge a given species (acclimation). Results are disputed when testing how biomass allocation patterns among species with contrasting tolerance of abiotic stress factors (adaptation) conform to optimal partitioning theory.</p><p>We tested the optimal partitioning theory by analyzing the relationships of proportional biomass allocation to leaves, stems and roots with species tolerance of shade and drought at a global scale including ~7000 observations for 604 woody species. The dataset spanned three plant functional types. In order to correct for ontogeny, differences among plant functional types at different levels of shade and drought tolerance were evaluated at three ontogenetic stages: seedlings, small trees and big trees. Adaptation and acclimation responses were also compared.</p><p>We did not find overarching biomass allocation patterns at different tolerance values across species even if tolerant and intolerant species rarely overlapped in the trait space. Biomass allocation mainly varied among plant functional types due to phenological (deciduous vs. evergreen broad-leaved species) and broad phylogenetical (angiosperms vs. gymnosperms) differences. Furthermore, the direction of biomass allocation responses between tolerant and intolerant species was often opposite compared to that predicted by the optimal partitioning theory.</p><p>Plant functional type is the major determinant of biomass allocation patterns in woody species at the global scale. Finally, interactions between ontogeny, plant functional type, species-specific stress tolerance<strong> </strong>adaptations (i.e. changes in organs surface area per unit dry mass), phenotypic plasticity or convergence in plant architecture can alter biomass allocation differences. All these factors permit woody species with different shade and drought tolerances to display multiple biomass partitioning strategies.</p>


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexey N. Shiklomanov ◽  
Elizabeth M. Cowdery ◽  
Michael Bahn ◽  
Chaeho Byun ◽  
Steven Jansen ◽  
...  

Plant Ecology ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 189 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra C. Müller ◽  
Gerhard E. Overbeck ◽  
Jörg Pfadenhauer ◽  
Valério D. Pillar

2013 ◽  
Vol 368 (1621) ◽  
pp. 20130116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Willem Erisman ◽  
James N. Galloway ◽  
Sybil Seitzinger ◽  
Albert Bleeker ◽  
Nancy B. Dise ◽  
...  

The demand for more food is increasing fertilizer and land use, and the demand for more energy is increasing fossil fuel combustion, leading to enhanced losses of reactive nitrogen (N r ) to the environment. Many thresholds for human and ecosystem health have been exceeded owing to N r pollution, including those for drinking water (nitrates), air quality (smog, particulate matter, ground-level ozone), freshwater eutrophication, biodiversity loss, stratospheric ozone depletion, climate change and coastal ecosystems (dead zones). Each of these environmental effects can be magnified by the ‘nitrogen cascade’: a single atom of N r can trigger a cascade of negative environmental impacts in sequence. Here, we provide an overview of the impact of N r on the environment and human health, including an assessment of the magnitude of different environmental problems, and the relative importance of N r as a contributor to each problem. In some cases, N r loss to the environment is the key driver of effects (e.g. terrestrial and coastal eutrophication, nitrous oxide emissions), whereas in some other situations nitrogen represents a key contributor exacerbating a wider problem (e.g. freshwater pollution, biodiversity loss). In this way, the central role of nitrogen can remain hidden, even though it actually underpins many trans-boundary pollution problems.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document