scholarly journals Norms of Belief

2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 374-392 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mona Simion ◽  
Christoph Kelp ◽  
Harmen Ghijsen
Keyword(s):  
Norms Of Belief

scholarly journals Evidence of factive norms of belief and decision

Synthese ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 192 (12) ◽  
pp. 4009-4030 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Turri
Keyword(s):  
Norms Of Belief

scholarly journals BLAME AND WRONGDOING

Episteme ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 275-296
Author(s):  
Jessica Brown
Keyword(s):  
Expected Value ◽  
Alternative Account ◽  
Norm Violation ◽  
Correct Account ◽  
Norms Of Belief

ABSTRACTThe idea that one can blamelessly violate a norm is central to ethics and epistemology. The paper examines the prospects for an account of blameless norm violation applicable both to norms governing action and norms governing belief. In doing so, I remain neutral on just what are the norms governing action and belief. I examine three leading suggestions for understanding blameless violation of a norm which is not overridden by another norm: (1) doxastic accounts; (2) epistemic accounts; and (3) appeal to expected value. We see that all of these accounts face problems when understood as accounts of blameless norm violation applicable to both belief and action. This leaves a variety of options including (1) seeking an alternative account of blameless norm violation common to belief and action; (2) concluding that we cannot determine the correct account of blameless norm violation independently of what are the norms of belief; and (3) abandoning the project of finding a common account of blameless norm violation common to ethics and epistemology.

Evidence, Judgment, and Belief at Will

Mind ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 128 (511) ◽  
pp. 837-859 ◽  
Author(s):  
Blake Roeber
Keyword(s):  
Doxastic Voluntarism ◽  
Norms Of Assertion ◽  
Insufficient Attention ◽  
Norms Of Belief ◽  
Contemporary Epistemology ◽  
At Will

Abstract Doxastic involuntarists have paid insufficient attention to two debates in contemporary epistemology: the permissivism debate and the debate over norms of assertion and belief. In combination, these debates highlight a conception of belief on which, if you find yourself in what I will call an ‘equipollent case’ with respect to some proposition p, there will be no reason why you can’t believe p at will. While doxastic involuntarism is virtually epistemological orthodoxy, nothing in the entire stock of objections to belief at will blocks this route to doxastic voluntarism. Against the backdrop of the permissivism debate and the literature on norms of belief and assertion, doxastic involuntarism emerges as an article of faith, not the obvious truth it’s usually purported to be.

Experience and Testimony in Hume's Philosophy

Episteme ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-57
Author(s):  
Saul Traiger
Keyword(s):  
Social Epistemology ◽  
First Person ◽  
Shared Experience ◽  
Standard Interpretation ◽  
Narrow View ◽  
Theory Of Ideas ◽  
Social Account ◽  
Norms Of Belief ◽  
Person Experience ◽  
First Person Experience

ABSTRACTThe standard interpretation of Hume on testimony takes him to be a reductionist; justification of beliefs from testimony ultimately depends on one's own first-person experience. Yet Hume's main discussions of testimony in the Treatise and first Enquiry suggest a social account. Hume appeals to shared experience and develops norms of belief from testimony that are not reductionist. It is argued that the reductionist interpretation rests on an overly narrow view of Hume's theory of ideas. By attending to such mechanisms of the imagination as abstraction and fictions, it is shown that Hume's theory of ideas does not forestall a non-reductionist social epistemology.

Replies: on norms of belief and knowledge

Synthese ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 194 (5) ◽  
pp. 1555-1564 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pascal Engel
Keyword(s):  
Norms Of Belief

Evidence and Agency: Norms of Belief for Promising and Resolving

2018 ◽  
Vol 69 (274) ◽  
pp. 197-199
Author(s):  
Christian Kietzmann
Keyword(s):  
Norms Of Belief

scholarly journals SIKAP, NORMA SUBJEKTIF DAN KONTROL KEPRILAKUAN PRAKTIK PEMBIAYAAN NASABAH KOPERASI SYARIAH di KABUPATEN BOGOR

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 63
Author(s):  
Faozan Amar ◽  
Edi Setiawan ◽  
Edi Setiawan
Keyword(s):  
Financial Services ◽  
Quantitative Research ◽  
Positive Influence ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Trust Evaluation ◽  
Improve Performance ◽  
And Behavior ◽  
Norms Of Belief ◽  
Normative Attitude

<p><em>This study aims to measure the normative attitude and behavior sharia cooperative customers in Bogor District. This type of research is a quantitative research. The data used using primary data through questionnaire. The results of this study indicate that attitudes and norms of belief have a significant or positive influence on customers' intentions to finance the sharia financial services cooperative in Bogor. Other results achieved by sharia cooperatives must improve performance to give more impression of honesty and what is in accordance with religious sharia. Where the advantages of sharia names will be more prominent than the conventional name, it is also to improve trust, evaluation, motivation and behavior of customers in financing the sharia financial services cooperatives. So that the financing intentions in accordance with the sharia can be realized properly.</em></p>

scholarly journals Evidence of Factive Norms of Belief and Decision

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Turri
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
False Proposition ◽  
Norms Of Belief

According to factive accounts of the norm of belief and decision-making, you should not believe or base decisions on a falsehood. Even when the evidence misleadingly suggests that a false proposition is true, you should not believe it or base decisions on it. Critics claim that factive accounts are counterintuitive and badly mischaracterize our ordinary practice of evaluating beliefs and decisions. This paper reports four experiments that rigorously test the critic’s accusations and the viability of factive accounts. The results undermine the accusations and provide the best evidence yet of factive norms of belief and decision-making. The results also help discriminate between two leading candidates for a factive norm: truth and knowledge. Knowledge is the superior candidate.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document