Particle shape trends across experimental cohesive and non‐cohesive sediment gravity flow deposits: Implications for particle fractionation and discrimination of depositional settings

Sedimentology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
George Pantopoulos ◽  
Rafael Manica ◽  
Adam D. McArthur ◽  
Juliano Kuchle
1988 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 317-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
William C. Schwab ◽  
Homa J. Lee ◽  
Bruce F. Molnia

Geology ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana R. Soria ◽  
Carlos L. Liesa ◽  
Maria Pilar Mata ◽  
José A. Arz ◽  
Laia Alegret ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 263 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexis Khripounoff ◽  
Annick Vangriesheim ◽  
Philippe Crassous ◽  
Joel Etoubleau

Geology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (12) ◽  
pp. 1149-1153
Author(s):  
Yang Peng ◽  
Cornel Olariu ◽  
Ronald J. Steel

Abstract Many modern deltas exhibit a compound geometry that consists of a shoreline clinoform and a larger subaqueous clinoform connected through a subaqueous platform. Despite the ubiquity of compound clinoforms in modern deltas, very few examples have been documented from the ancient sedimentary record. We present recognition criteria for shelf compound-clinoform systems in both tide- and wave-dominated deltas by integration of ancient and modern examples from multiple types of data. The compound clinothem can be identified by using a combination of: (1) the three-dimensional (3-D) configuration identified in bathymetric or seismic data, (2) bipartite stacked regressive units, consisting of a lower muddy coarsening-to-fining-upward (CUFU) or coarsening-upward (CU) unit (30–100 m thick) and an overlying sandier CU unit (5–30 m thick) (together they represent the subaqueous and shoreline clinoform pair), and (3) distinct facies described herein, though both types of delta have highly bioturbated mudstone and siltstone bottomsets. Tide-dominated deltas have muddy foresets with tidal scours containing tidal rhythmites or inclined heterolithic strata in the subaqueous clinothem overlain by river and tidal deposits of the shoreline clinothem. Wave-dominated deltas show mainly wave-enhanced sediment-gravity-flow (WSGF) beds and some thin hummocky/swaley cross-stratified (HCS/SCS) sandstones toward the top in the subaqueous muddy foreset, and upward-thickening HCS/SCS and trough/planar cross-bedded sandstones interbedded with siltstones in the shoreline clinothem. The subaqueous platform, which links the clinoform couplet, shows evidence of frequent tidal or wave reworking and redeposition. The platform in tide-dominated deltas is characterized by tide-generated heterolithic strata (e.g., bidirectional current-rippled and cross-stratified sandstones, spring and neap tidal bundles, tidal rhythmites) with occasional storm-wave–influenced strata. In contrast, the wave-dominated platform comprises small-scale swales with scours and mud clasts and some WSGF deposits. The proposed criteria can aid in the recognition of compound deltaic clinothems in other basins, particularly those with limited amounts and/or types of data.


AAPG Bulletin ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 102 (09) ◽  
pp. 1703-1737
Author(s):  
Gregory S. Hurd ◽  
Charles Kerans ◽  
Edmund L. Frost ◽  
J. Antonio Simo ◽  
Xavier Janson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document