scholarly journals Distribution of Historic Market Data – Implied and Realized Volatility

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 104 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Dashti Moghaddam ◽  
Zhiyuan Liu ◽  
R. A. Serota
Keyword(s):  
Implied Volatility ◽  
Realized Volatility ◽  
Shape Parameters ◽  
Realized Variance ◽  
Market Data ◽  
Systematic Comparison

We undertake a systematic comparison between implied volatility, as represented by VIX (new methodology) and VXO (old methodology) and realized volatility. We do not find substantial difference in accuracy between VIX and VXO. We compare visually and statistically the distributions of realized and implied variance (volatility squared) and study the distribution of their ratio. The ratio distributions are studied both for the known realized variance (for the current month) and for the predicted realized variance (for the following month). We show that the ratio of the two is best fitted by a Beta Prime distribution, whose shape parameters depend strongly on which of the two months is used.

scholarly journals Predictability of OTC Option Volatility for Future Stock Volatility

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 5200
Author(s):  
Jungmu Kim ◽  
Yuen Jung Park
Keyword(s):  
Information Content ◽  
Unbiased Estimator ◽  
Implied Volatility ◽  
Realized Volatility ◽  
Stock Index ◽  
Options Market ◽  
Over The Counter ◽  
Index Options ◽  
Stock Volatility ◽  
Future Realized Volatility

This study explores the information content of the implied volatility inferred from stock index options in the over-the-counter (OTC) market, which has rarely been studied in the literature. Using OTC calls, puts, and straddles on the KOSPI 200 index, we find that implied volatility generally outperforms historical volatility in predicting future realized volatility, although it is not an unbiased estimator. The results are more apparent for options with shorter maturity. However, while implied volatility has strong predictability during normal periods, historical volatility is superior to implied volatility during a period of crisis due to the liquidity contraction of the OTC options market. This finding suggests that the OTC options market can play a role in conveying important information to predict future volatility.

Realized Skewness and the Return Predictability

2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 119-152
Author(s):  
Myounghwa Sim
Keyword(s):  
Stock Returns ◽  
Cross Section ◽  
Realized Volatility ◽  
Return Predictability ◽  
Higher Moments ◽  
Firm Characteristics ◽  
Realized Variance ◽  
Negative Relation ◽  
Intraday Data ◽  
Skewness And Kurtosis

We explore the cross-section of realized variance, skewness, and kurtosis for stock returns obtained from intraday data. We investigate the properties of the realized higher moments, and more importantly, examine relations between the realized moments and subsequent stock returns. We find evidence of a negative relation between realized skewness and next week’s returns. A strategy buying stocks in the lowest realized skewness quintile and selling stocks in the highest realized skewness quintile earns 0.79 percent per week a risk-adjusted basis. Our results on the realized skewness are robust to controls for various firm characteristics such as size and book-to-market. Little evidence exists that either the realized volatility or the realized kurtosis is significantly related to next week’s returns.

An Empirical Research on the Informational Efficiency of Model Free Implied Volatility

2008 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 67-94
Author(s):  
Byung Kun Rhee ◽  
Sang Won Hwang
Keyword(s):  
Implied Volatility ◽  
Realized Volatility ◽  
Informational Efficiency ◽  
Option Prices ◽  
Index Options ◽  
Model Free ◽  
Black Scholes ◽  
Option Pricing Model ◽  
Korean Market ◽  
Better Than

Black-Scholes Imolied volatility (8SIV) has a few drawbacks. One is that the model Is not much successful in fitting the option prices. and It Is n야 guaranteed the model is correct one. Second. the usual tradition in using the BSIV is that only at-the-money Options are used. It is well-known that IV's of In-the-money or Qut-of-the-money ootions are much different from those estimated from near-the-money options. In this regard, a new model is confronted with Korean market data. Brittenxmes and Neuberger (2000) derive a formula for volatility which is a function of option prices‘ Since the formula is derived without using any option pricing model. volatility estimated from the formula is called model-tree implied volatillty (MFIV). MFIV overcomes the two drawbacks of BSIV. Jiang and Tian (2005) show that. with the S&P index Options (SPX), MFIV is suoerlor to historical volatility (HV) or BSIV in forecasting the future volatllity. In KOSPI 200 index options, when the forecasting performances are compared, MFIV is better than any other estimated volatilities. The hypothesis that MFIV contains all informations for realized volatility and the other volatilities are redundant is oot rejected in any cases.

scholarly journals Forecasting Realized Volatility of Russian stocks using Google Trends and Implied Volatility

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-88
Author(s):  
T. Bazhenov ◽  
D. Fantazzini
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Empirical Evidence ◽  
Value At Risk ◽  
Implied Volatility ◽  
Realized Volatility ◽  
Google Trends ◽  
Probability Level ◽  
Sample Analysis ◽  
Search Activity ◽  
Additional Information

This work proposes to forecast the Realized Volatility (RV) and the Value-at-Risk (VaR) of the most liquid Russian stocks using GARCH, ARFIMA and HAR models, including both the implied volatility computed from options prices and Google Trends data. The in-sample analysis showed that only the implied volatility had a significant effect on the realized volatility across most stocks and estimated models, whereas Google Trends did not have any significant effect. The outof-sample analysis highlighted that models including the implied volatility improved their forecasting performances, whereas models including internet search activity worsened their performances in several cases. Moreover, simple HAR and ARFIMA models without additional regressors often reported the best forecasts for the daily realized volatility and for the daily Value-at-Risk at the 1 % probability level, thus showing that efficiency gains more than compensate any possible model misspecifications and parameters biases. Our empirical evidence shows that, in the case of Russian stocks, Google Trends does not capture any additional information already included in the implied volatility.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document