scholarly journals Simultaneous High-Speed Formaldehyde PLIF and Schlieren Imaging of Multiple Injections From an ECN Spray D Injector

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noud Maes ◽  
Hyung Sub Sim ◽  
Lukas Weiss ◽  
Lyle Pickett
Author(s):  
Noud Maes ◽  
Hyung Sub Sim ◽  
Lukas Weiss ◽  
Lyle Pickett

Abstract The interaction of multiple injections in a diesel engine facilitates a complex interplay between freshly introduced fuel, previous combustion products, and overall combustion. To improve understanding of the relevant processes, high-speed Planar Laser-Induced Fluorescence (PLIF) with 355-nm excitation of formaldehyde and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon (PAH) soot precursors is applied to multiple injections of n-dodecane from Engine Combustion Network Spray D, characterized by a converging 189-μm nozzle. High-speed schlieren imaging is applied simultaneously with 50-kHz PLIF excitation to visualize the spray structures, jet penetration, and ignition processes. For the first injection, formaldehyde (as an indicator of low-temperature chemistry) is first found in the jet periphery, after which it quickly propagates through the center of the jet, towards the jet head prior to high-temperature ignition. At second-stage ignition, downstream formaldehyde is consumed rapidly and upstream formaldehyde develops into a quasi-steady structure for as long as the momentum flux from the injector continues. Since the first injection in this work is relatively short, differences to a single long injection are readily observed, ultimately resulting in high-temperature combustion and PAH structures appearing farther upstream after the end of injection. For the second injection in this work, the first formaldehyde signal is significantly advanced because of the entrained high-temperature combustion products, and an obvious premixed burn event does not occur. The propensity for combustion recession after the end of the first injection changes significantly with ambient temperature, thereby affecting the level of interaction between the first- and second injection.


2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary S. Settles ◽  
Torben P. Grumstrup ◽  
Lori J. Dodson ◽  
J. D. Miller ◽  
Joseph A. Gatto

Author(s):  
Andrew Leidy ◽  
Ian T. Neel ◽  
Nathan R. Tichenor ◽  
Rodney D. Bowersox ◽  
John D. Schmisseur

AIAA Journal ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 58 (7) ◽  
pp. 3090-3099 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew N. Leidy ◽  
Ian T. Neel ◽  
Nathan R. Tichenor ◽  
Rodney D. W. Bowersox

2021 ◽  
pp. 112067212110378
Author(s):  
Rodrigo Anguita ◽  
Nicholas Brennan ◽  
Conor M Ramsden ◽  
Manjit Mehat ◽  
David Keegan ◽  
...  

Objective: To assess the patterns of patient generated aerosol in the context of ophthalmic surgery and ophthalmic examinations. To inform medical teams regarding potential hazards and suggest mitigating measures. Methods: Qualitatively, real-time time videography assessed exhalation patterns from simulated patients under different clinical scenarios using propylene glycol from an e-cigarette. Quantitatively, high-speed Schlieren imaging was performed to enable high resolution recordings analysable by MATLAB technical computing software. Results: Without a face mask, the standard prior to COVID 19, vapour was observed exiting through the opening in the drape over the surgical field. The amount of vapour increased when a surgical mask was worn. With a taped face mask, the amount of vapour decreased and with inclusion of a continuous suction device, the least amount of vapour was seen. These results were equivocal when the patient was supine or sitting upright. High-speed Schlieren imaging corroborated these findings and in addition showed substantial increase in airflow egress during coughing and with ill-fitting face masks. Conclusion: Advising patients to wear a surgical mask at the time of ophthalmic interventions potentially contaminants the ocular field with patient generated aerosol risking endophthalmitis. Surgeon safety can be maintained with personal protective equipment to mitigate the increased egress of vapour from the surgical drape and taping, with or without suction is advisable, whilst meticulous hygiene around lenses is required at the time of slit lamp examination.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document