A Framework and Model for Assessing the Design Point Performance, Off-Design Point Performance, Control, Economics and Risks of Brayton Helium Gas Turbine Cycles for Generation IV Nuclear Power Plants

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnold Gad-Briggs ◽  
Pericles Pilidis ◽  
Theoklis Nikolaidis
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Gas Turbine ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Nuclear Power Plants ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Design Point ◽  
Load Following ◽  
Gen Iv ◽  
Cycle Efficiency

A framework – NuTERA (Nuclear Techno-Economic and Risk Assessment) has been developed to set out the requirements for evaluating Generation IV (Gen IV) Nuclear Power Plants (NPPs) at the design conceptual stage. The purpose of the framework is to provide guidelines for future tools that are required to support the decision-making process on the choice of Gen IV concepts and cycle configurations. In this paper, the underpinning of the framework has been demonstrated to enable the creation of an analyses tool, which evaluates the design of an NPP that utilises helium closed Brayton gas turbine cycles. The tool at the broad spectrum focuses on the component and cycle design, Design Point (DP) and Off-Design Point (ODP) performance, part power and load following operations. Specifically, the design model has been created to provide functionalities that look at the in-depth sensitivities of the design factors and operation that affect the efficiency of an NPP such as temperature and pressure ratios, inlet cycle temperatures, component efficiencies, pressure losses. The ODP performance capabilities include newly derived component maps for the reactor, intercooler and recuperator for long term Off-Design (OD) operation. With regard to short term OD, which is typically driven by changes in ambient conditions, the ability to analyse the cycle load following capabilities are possible. An economic model has also been created, which calculates the component costs and the baseline economic evaluation. An incorporated risk model quantifies the performance, operational, financial and design impact risks. However, the tool is able to optimise the NPP cycle configuration based on the best economics using the Levelised Unit Electricity Cost (LUEC) as a measure. The tool has been used to demonstrate a typical decision-making process on 2 Gen IV helium closed gas turbine cycles, which apply to the Gas-cooled Fast Reactors (GFRs) and Very-High Temperature Reactors (VHTRs). The cycles are the Simple Cycle Recuperator (SCR) and Intercooled Cycle Recuperator (ICR). The tool was able to derive the most efficient cycle configurations for the ICR (53% cycle efficiency) and SCR (50% cycle efficiency). Based on these efficiency figures, the baseline LUEC ($/MWh) for the year 2020 is $62.13 for the ICR and $61.84 for the SCR. However, the inclusion of the cost of contingencies due to risks and the subsequent economic optimisation resulted in a cost of $69.70 and $69.80 for the ICR and SCR respectively.

scholarly journals Benefits, Drawbacks, and Future Trends of Brayton Helium Gas Turbine Cycles for Gas-Cooled Fast Reactor and Very-High Temperature Reactor Generation IV Nuclear Power Plants

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnold Gad-Briggs ◽  
Emmanuel Osigwe ◽  
Pericles Pilidis ◽  
Theoklis Nikolaidis ◽  
Suresh Sampath ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Temperature ◽  
Gas Turbine ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Nuclear Power Plants ◽  
Optimum Operating ◽  
Future Trends ◽  
Design Point ◽  
Gen Iv ◽  
Very High

Abstract Numerous studies are on-going on to understand the performance of generation IV (Gen IV) nuclear power plants (NPPs). The objective is to determine optimum operating conditions for efficiency and economic reasons in line with the goals of Gen IV. For Gen IV concepts such as the gas-cooled fast reactors (GFRs) and very-high temperature reactors (VHTRs), the choice of cycle configuration is influenced by component choices, the component configuration and the choice of coolant. The purpose of this paper to present and review current cycles being considered—the simple cycle recuperated (SCR) and the intercooled cycle recuperated (ICR). For both cycles, helium is considered as the coolant in a closed Brayton gas turbine configuration. Comparisons are made for design point (DP) and off-design point (ODP) analyses to emphasize the pros and cons of each cycle. This paper also discusses potential future trends, include higher reactor core outlet temperatures (COT) in excess of 1000 °C and the simplified cycle configurations.

A Review of Brayton Helium Gas Turbine Cycles for GFR and VHTR Generation IV Nuclear Power Plants

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnold Gad-Briggs ◽  
Pericles Pilidis ◽  
Theoklis Nikolaidis
Keyword(s):  
Gas Turbine ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Nuclear Power Plants ◽  
Operating Conditions ◽  
Cycle Performance ◽  
Optimum Operating ◽  
Design Point ◽  
Helium Gas ◽  
Gen Iv

Studies are currently on-going on the cycle performance of Generation IV (Gen IV) Nuclear Power Plants (NPPs) for the purpose of determining optimum operating conditions for efficiency and economic reasons. For Gas-cooled Fast Reactors (GFRs) and Very-High Temperature Reactors (VHTRs), the cycle layout is predominantly driven by the choice of components, the component configuration and the coolant. The purpose of this paper to present and review the cycles currently being considered — the Simple Cycle Recuperated (SCR) and the Intercooled Cycle Recuperated (ICR). In all cases, the cycles utilise helium as the coolant in a closed Brayton gas turbine configuration. Comparisons between the cycles are made for Design Point (DP) and Off-Design Point (ODP) analyses to emphasise the benefits and drawbacks of each cycle. The paper also talks about future trends which include higher Core Outlet Temperatures in excess of 1000 degrees Celsius and the proposal of a simplified cycle configuration which eliminates the need for the recuperator.

scholarly journals Why We Need Nuclear Power Plants

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Power Plant ◽  
Natural Gas ◽  
Gas Turbine ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Nuclear Power Plants ◽  
Rankine Cycle ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Brayton Cycle ◽  
Gen Iv

The major growth in the electricity production industry in the last 30 years has centered on the expansion of natural gas power plants based on gas turbine cycles. The most popular extension of the simple Brayton gas turbine has been the combined cycle power plant with the Air-Brayton cycle serving as the topping cycle and the Steam-Rankine cycle serving as the bottoming cycle for new generation of nuclear power plants that are known as GEN-IV. The Air-Brayton cycle is an open-air cycle and the Steam-Rankine cycle is a closed cycle. The air-Brayton cycle for a natural gas driven power plant must be an open cycle, where the air is drawn in from the environment and exhausted with the products of combustion to the environment. This technique is suggested as an innovative approach to GEN-IV nuclear power plants in form and type of Small Modular Reactors (SMRs). The hot exhaust from the AirBrayton cycle passes through a Heat Recovery Steam Generator (HSRG) prior to exhausting to the environment in a combined cycle. The HRSG serves the same purpose as a boiler for the conventional Steam-Rankine cycle [1].

scholarly journals Risk-Informed Approach to Safety Operation of Units of Nuclear Power Plants

10.12737/189 ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-19
Author(s):  
Ершов ◽  
G. Ershov ◽  
Антонов ◽  
Aleksandr Antonov ◽  
Морозова ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Nuclear Power Plants ◽  
Probabilistic Methods ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Widespread Application ◽  
Safety Assurance ◽  
Safety Operation ◽  
Method Approach

Safety assurance of NPP units operation is the top priority objective for operating and regulatory organizations. For the purpose of NPP safety assurance deterministic and probabilistic methods the main advantages of which are combined into risk-informed method (approach) are traditionally utilized. Nowadays the risk-informed approach has a widespread application in the riskinformed decision-making process.

scholarly journals Analyses of the Associated Technical and Economic Risks of the Simple and Intercooled Brayton Helium Recuperated Gas Turbine Cycles for Generation IV Nuclear Power Plants

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnold Gad-Briggs ◽  
Pericles Pilidis ◽  
Theoklis Nikolaidis
Keyword(s):  
Gas Turbine ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Nuclear Power Plants ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Plant Design ◽  
Discount Rates ◽  
Electricity Cost ◽  
Cycle Efficiency ◽  
Economic Risks

The simple cycle recuperated (SCR) and intercooled cycle recuperated (ICR) are highly efficient Brayton helium gas turbine cycles, designed for the gas-cooled fast reactor (GFR) and very-high-temperature reactor (VHTR) generation IV (Gen IV) nuclear power plants (NPPs). This paper documents risk analyses, which consider technical and economic aspects of the NPP. The sensitivity analyses are presented that interrogate the plant design, performance, and operational schedule and range from component efficiencies, system pressure losses, operating at varied power output due to short-term load-following or long-term reduced power operations to prioritize other sources such as renewables. The sensitivities of the economic and construction schedule are also considered in terms of the discount rates, capital and operational costs, and increased costs in decontamination and decommissioning (D&D) activity due to changes in the discount rates. This was made possible by using a tool designed for this study to demonstrate the effect on the “noncontingency” baseline levelized unit electricity cost (LUEC) of both cycles. The SCR with a cycle efficiency of 50% has a cheaper baseline LUEC of $58.41/MWh in comparison to the ICR (53% cycle efficiency), which has an LUEC of $58.70/MWh. However, the cost of the technical and economic risks is cheaper for the ICR resulting in a final LUEC of $70.45/MWh (ICR) in comparison to the SCR ($71.62/MWh) for the year 2020 prices.

Analyses of the Off-Design Point Performance of a High Pressure Ratio Intercooled Brayton Helium Gas Turbine Cycle for Generation IV Nuclear Power Plants

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnold Gad-Briggs ◽  
Pericles Pilidis
Keyword(s):  
Pressure Loss ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Nuclear Power Plants ◽  
Pressure Ratio ◽  
Design Point ◽  
Part Load ◽  
Pressure Losses ◽  
High Pressure Ratio ◽  
Cycle Efficiency

The Intercooled Cycle (IC) is considered as a viable alternative to the Simple Cycle Recuperated (SCR) and the Intercooled Cycle Recuperated (ICR), based on recent studies in a Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) configuration, which showed plant efficiencies of above 45%. The main difference in configuration is it does not utilise a recuperator. For part load performance, it is expected that the components of the IC will not operate at optimum conditions as the characteristics change. Thus the ability to demonstrate viable part load performance becomes an important requirement for the IC. The main objective of this study is to derive Off-Design Points (ODPs) from a known Design Point (DP) for a temperature range of −35 to 50°C and COTs between 750 to 1000°C. The ODPs have been calculated using a modelling & performance simulation tool designed specifically for this study and aim to provide a set of points that give operational equilibrium, which is critical to the economics of the plant. Results show that the intercooler alters the actual mass flow rate and compressor pressure ratio but the delta across an analysed range of 1 to 5% pressure loss shows a change of ∼9% in plant cycle efficiency, in comparison to the ICR (6%). Furthermore, the reactor pressure losses for IC has the lowest effect on plant cycle efficiency in comparison to the SCR and ICR. Characteristic trend maps have also been produced for the intercooler operation and the reactor and are applicable for NPP first order calculations. To that effect, it is also proposed to consider the intercooler pressure loss as a handle for ODP performance calculations. The analyses intend to bring further attention to the IC an alternative to current cycle configurations and to aid the development of cycles for Generation IV Nuclear Power Plants specifically Gas Cooled Fast Reactors (GFRs) and Very High Temperature Reactors (VHTRs), where helium is the coolant.

scholarly journals Analyses of the Costs Associated With Very High Turbine Entry Temperatures in Helium Recuperated Gas Turbine Cycles for Generation IV Nuclear Power Plants

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Gad-Briggs ◽  
P. Pilidis ◽  
T. Nikolaidis
Keyword(s):  
Gas Turbine ◽  
Turbine Blade ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Turbine Blades ◽  
Turbine Cooling ◽  
Electricity Cost ◽  
Gen Iv ◽  
Cycle Efficiency ◽  
Very High

Previous analyses of generation IV (GEN IV) helium gas turbine cycles indicated the possibility for high turbine entry temperatures (TETs) up to 1200 °C in order to improve cycle efficiency, using improved turbine blade material and optimum turbine cooling fractions. The purpose of this paper is to understand the effect on the levelized unit electricity cost (LUEC) of the nuclear power plant (NPP), when the TET is increased to 1200 °C from an original TET of 950 °C and when an improved turbine blade material is used to reduce the turbine cooling fraction. The analyses focus on the simple cycle recuperated (SCR) and the intercooled cycle recuperated (ICR). The baseline LUECs of the NPPs were calculated as $61.84/MWh (SCR) and $62.16/MWh for a TET of 950 °C. The effect of changing the turbine blades improved the allowable blade metal temperature by 15% with a reduction in the LUEC by 0.6% (SCR) and 0.7% (ICR). Furthermore, increasing the TET to 1200 °C has a significant effect on the power output but more importantly it reduces the LUECs by 22.7% (SCR) and 19.8% (ICR). The analyses intend to aid development of the SCR and ICR including improving the decision making process on choice of cycles applicable to the gas-cooled fast reactors (GFRs) and very high-temperature reactors (VHTRs), where helium is the coolant.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document