Pipeline Construction Practices Risk Assessment Methodology

Author(s):  
Robert Lazor

This paper examines how changes to pipeline construction specifications/practices can impact both technical and economic considerations of the overall project. The main topics of concern fall under the general headings of joining design, welding, and nondestructive examination (NDE). The different options for the project-specific construction specifications include a discussion of recommended construction practices, and includes an assessment of the risks associated with the different construction alternatives. The following six specific issues were considered significant to the risk of construction-related issues and these were the focus of this scope of work: • Assess the design requirements for joining pipe with different wall thickness, and specifically the use of counterbored and tapered transition pieces; • Examine the impact of specific welding-related construction activities such as release of internal line-up clamps used for welding; • Examine the need for hot pass deposition before removing the internal line-up clamp; • Examine the delay time between weld passes and the total time to complete each weld; • Investigate delay time before completion of weld NDE; • Consider the differences between the use of gamma and x-ray NDE, and the likelihood of detecting weld flaws. A semi-quantitative risk assessment methodology has been developed to calculate the likelihood of failure from planar defects in girth welds. The failure frequencies of girth welds have been based on industry experience, and combined with the likelihood of detection using nondestructive examination techniques, it is possible to show the likelihood of failure during either hydrostatic testing or subsequent service of the pipeline. The results of such an analysis can be used to evaluate the risks associated with changes to construction practices along the pipeline right-of-way.

2015 ◽  
Vol 61 (3) ◽  
pp. 63-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Konior

AbstractThe purpose of this article is to present the preparation of Project Risk Assessment Methodology and its mitigation in complex construction projects. The main text provides a summary of the approach, the method used and the findings. The conclusions have been drawn that the proper tools for quantifying risks have to be based on the criteria specific for mathematical statistic and probability or at least fuzziness. Function, which makes possible to categorize any risks into one of the five categories, is a combination of probability and the impact on one of the items: people and their safety or budget, cost, schedule and planning or quality and performance. An attempt was made to express numerically the relationship between risks impacts and their level of likelihood. Also, a method of associating the influence of projects risks impacts on the extent of the likelihood of project risk occurrence which makes possible to determine the direction and the strength of this relationship was presented.


2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 1399-1408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catalin Cioaca ◽  
Cristian-George Constantinescu ◽  
Mircea Boscoianu ◽  
Ramona Lile

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael H. Azarian

Abstract As counterfeiting techniques and processes grow in sophistication, the methods needed to detect these parts must keep pace. This has the unfortunate effect of raising the costs associated with managing this risk. In order to ensure that the resources devoted to counterfeit detection are commensurate with the potential effects and likelihood of counterfeit part usage in a particular application, a risk based methodology has been adopted for testing of electrical, electronic, and electromechanical (EEE) parts by the SAE AS6171 set of standards. This paper provides an overview of the risk assessment methodology employed within AS6171 to determine the testing that should be utilized to manage the risk associated with the use of a part. A scenario is constructed as a case study to illustrate how multiple solutions exist to address the risk for a particular situation, and the choice of any specific test plan can be made on the basis of practical considerations, such as cost, time, or the availability of particular test equipment.


2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takeshi Shinoda ◽  
Takashi Tanaka

It is a challenge to prevent an occupational accident in any industrial activities. The aim of this study is to improve the safety and reduce the risk of occupational accidents at shipyard through developing a risk assessment. This paper describes the concept and methodology of risk assessment for occupational safety and its application. The methodology introduces an effective and useful assessment procedure to construct the database based on the past occupational accidents occurred at shipyards. Quantitative methodology is developed to understand the unsafe working conditions and environment at the shipyard by the convenient handheld to collect the data with Information Technology. Some examples of effective hazard countermeasures are suggested and a feasibility study is conducted to improve a walking environment at shipyards.


2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 513-526 ◽  
Author(s):  
Limao Zhang ◽  
Xianguo Wu ◽  
Queqing Chen ◽  
Miroslaw J. Skibniewski ◽  
Jingbing Zhong

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document