Analysis of Hot Spot Stress and Alternative Structural Stress Methods

Author(s):  
P. Dong ◽  
J. K. Hong

There is a growing need for robust finite element based fatigue assessment procedures for welded joints in offshore/marine structures. Although widely accepted in tubular structures, the applications of the conventional hot spot stress (HSS) procedures in plate structures have proven to be problematic in some joint types. There are a series of on-going international efforts that are intended to address some of the issues to improve the consistency of the HSS calculation procedures for plate structures. In this regard, alternative structural stress (SS) procedures that share some similarities to conventional HSS methods have been developed. The SS method has been shown to be effective in calculating structural stresses directly at failure locations such as at weld toes with minimum mesh-sensitivity. In this paper, detailed analysis and assessments of the conventional HSS and the alternative SS procedures are presented. Starting with the fundamental definitions of both HSS and SS parameters, the underlying mechanics associated with the two types of the stress analysis methods will be discussed by considering series of typical joint types, particularly on some of the important stress concentration characteristics that separate tubular joints from plate joints. Then, the necessary and sufficient conditions required for a stress definition relevant to fatigue and its calculation procedures will be demonstrated for both methods. Areas of concerns and improvements for both methods will be demonstrated by using a series of selected joint types typical of those in marine/offshore structures. Finally, the corresponding S-N data will be used to demonstrate the relative effectiveness of HSS and SS methods in consolidating the data from drastically different joint types into a single S-N curve.

2006 ◽  
Vol 129 (3) ◽  
pp. 355-362 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pingsha Dong ◽  
Jeong K. Hong ◽  
Abílio M. P. De Jesus

In support of the ASME Div 2 Rewrite, a master S-N curve approach has been developed using a mesh-insensitive structural stress procedure for fatigue evaluation of welded components. The effectiveness of the master S-N curve approach has been demonstrated in a number of earlier publications for many joint types and loading conditions for pipe and vessel components as well as plate joints. To further validate the structural stress method, a series of recent test data (small weld details and a full-scale vessel) published by De Jesus et al. (2004, Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures, 27, pp. 799–810) were analyzed in this paper. A comparative assessment of various existing procedures and their effectiveness in correlating the fatigue test data by De Jesus is also presented. These assessment procedures include current ASME Sec. VIII Div 2, weld classification approach in PD 5500, and the surface extrapolation-based hot spot stress approach in recently approved European EN 13445 Standards.


Author(s):  
P. Dong ◽  
J. K. Hong ◽  
A. M. P. De Jesus

In support of the ASME Div 2 Rewrite, a master S-N curve approach has been developed using a mesh-insensitive structural stress procedure for fatigue evaluation of welded components. The effectiveness of the master S-N curve approach has been demonstrated in a number of earlier publications for many joint types and loading conditions for pipe and vessel components as well as plate joints. To further validate the structural stress method, a series of recent test data (small weld details and a full scale vessel) published by De Jesus et al (2004) were analyzed in this paper. A comparative assessment of various existing procedures and their effectiveness in correlating the fatigue test data by De Jesus et al (2004) is also presented. These assessment procedures include current ASME Sec. VIII Div 2, weld classification approach in PD 5500, and the surface extrapolation-based hot spot stress approach in recently approved European EN 13445 Standards.


Author(s):  
Brian E. Healy

A case study comparison of the surface extrapolation and Battelle structural stress methodologies has been performed on a side shell connection detail typical of a representative FPSO or tanker vessel. Computations of hot spot stress via either method are consistent with current recommended practice. Convergence analysis to determine the hot spot stresses that best serve as fatigue parameters and a fatigue comparison that employs hot spot stresses from the convergence analysis have been executed at various locations around the detail. Results are reported and discussed.


Dynamics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 125-133
Author(s):  
Sudath C. Siriwardane ◽  
Nirosha D. Adasooriya ◽  
Dimitrios Pavlou

Offshore structures are subjected to dynamic environmental loads (wave and wind loads). A stress-life fatigue strength curve is proposed for tubular joints which are in the splash zone area of offshore jacket structures. The Det Norske Veritas (DNV) offshore structures standards given design T-curve in the air is modified with the environment-dependent parameters to obtain this fatigue strength curve. Validity of the curve is done by comparing fatigue lives given by the proposed curve with experimental fatigue lives of tubular joints tested in seawater under different loading conditions. The fatigue assessment of a case study tubular joint is performed using the proposed curve. Nominal stress ranges of the members, which are connected to the joint, are obtained by dynamic analysis of the jacket structure. Stress concentration factors are utilized with the nominal stresses to obtain the hot spot stress ranges. Fatigue lives are calculated and compared with the conventional approach. Hence the applicability and significance of the proposed fatigue strength curve are discussed.


Author(s):  
Pingsha Dong ◽  
Jeong K. Hong

A series of well-known tubular joints tested in UKSORP II have been re-evaluated using the mesh-insensitive structural stress method as a part of the on-going Battelle Structural Stress JIP efforts. In this report, the structural stress based analysis procedure is first presented for applications in tubular joints varying from simple T joints, double T Joints, YT joints with overlap, and K joints with various internal stiffening configurations. The structural stress based SCFs are then compared with those obtained using traditional surface extrapolation based hot spot stress methods. Their abilities in effectively correlating the fatigue data collected from these tubular joints are demonstrated. These tests are also compared with the T curve typically used for fatigue design of tubular joints as well as the structural stress based master S-N curve adopted by ASME Section VIII Div 2. Finally, some of the implications on fracture mechanics based remaining life assessment for tubular joints are discussed in light of the results obtained in this investigation.


2008 ◽  
Vol 580-582 ◽  
pp. 633-636 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kwang Seok Kim ◽  
Joong Kyoo Kang ◽  
Joo Ho Heo ◽  
Sung Geun Lee

The structural stress (SS) method developed by BATTELLE has been studied based on small or mid-size scale specimens. In order to apply the new method, such as SS, on an actual project, it should have application results on actual project. However, SS method didn’t have a lot of application data compared to class procedure using hot spot stress (HSS). In order to find out whether the SS method, for the evaluation of fatigue life, can give reasonable results when it is applied under the same loading suggested by classification societies, it was compared with fatigue lives derived by class. ABS & DNV’s simplified fatigue analysis method were adopted to check the validity of SS method. Before applying complicated loading of class, static loading case was applied, since the class method has their own correlation factor for wave loading. And then, simplified fatigue analysis was performed with more complicated loading cases. From the results of fatigue life calculation, it can be said that SS shows reasonable fatigue lives with respect to HSS or notch stress based fatigue lives.


Author(s):  
Shrikarpagam Dhandapani

Fatigue occurs in structures due to the stresses from cyclic environmental loads. Offshore environmental loads being highly cyclic and recurring in nature, fatigue analysis with high degree of accuracy is required for reliable and optimized design of offshore structures. The main aim of this paper is to automate the process of identification of fatigue critical tubular joints of an offshore jacket structure using deterministic fatigue analysis with emphasis on the Hot Spot Stress Range (HSSR), an important measure in estimating fatigue damage, calculated using three different approaches for each tubular joint. The first approach determines HSSR at the time of maximum base shear of the jacket, the second, by calculating the difference between maximum and minimum Hot Spot Stress (HSS) and the third, at all time-instants of the wave cycle. Thus fatigue damage and fatigue life of the tubular joints are estimated using the highest HSSR value and the joints with lower fatigue life are identified as fatigue sensitive joints. This ensures effective identification of critical tubular joints of the offshore jacket structure which needs detailed investigation or redesign for fatigue. The deterministic approach discussed in this paper is applicable to large jackets which contains more number of tubular joints where sophisticated fatigue assessment at the preliminary stage is computationally intensive and manual identification of fatigue critical joints is laborious.


2006 ◽  
Vol 20 (25n27) ◽  
pp. 4225-4230
Author(s):  
DAE-JIN KIM ◽  
CHANG-SUNG SEOK ◽  
JAE-MEAN KOO

In this study, fatigue tests to obtain S - N curves and FE analyses to obtain structural stress concentration factors were conducted for two types of fillet welded cruciform joints, that is, load-carrying and non load-carrying types. The obtained S - N curve of the load-carrying joint was changed to that based on hot-spot stress. As a result, the S - N curve of the load-carrying joint based on hot-spot stress almost coincided with that of the non load-carrying joint based on nominal stress. The fatigue strength of a welded joint which has a different geometry from that of the non load-carrying cruciform joint but the same bead profile as that of the non load-carrying cruciform joint could be estimated by using both the structural stress concentration factor at the weld toe position obtained from FEM and the nominal S - N curve of the non load-carrying cruciform joint from experiment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document