Engineering Critical Assessments of Ductile Pipes With Axial Flaws and High Strain Hardening Capacity

Author(s):  
Claudio Ruggieri

ECA procedures of crack-like defects based upon the FAD philosophy have undergone extensive developments in the past decade to form the basis for industrial codes and guidelines for structural integrity assessments. However, the application (and validation) of these procedures in defect assessments of structural components made of ductile materials under low constraint conditions remains a potential open issue. A central objective of this work is to assess the capability of the failure assessment diagram methodology to predict the failure pressure of ductile pipes with planar defects having different geometries. Specifically, the present work compares the burst pressure predictions for austenitic steel pipes with axial flaws derived from two widely used FAD procedures:BS7910 and API579. Such an application serves as a prototype for a wide class of integrity assessment problems involving the effects of strain hardening properties and ductility while, at the same time, assessing the robustness of FAD procedures in failure predictions. The direct application of BS7910 procedure indicate rather large margins between the predicted and the actual (measured) failure pressures. In contrast, the API 579 procedure appears to provide better agreement with experimental data. Overall, the results validate the use of FAD-based methodologies for defect assessments of ductile pipes with axial crack-like flaws.

Author(s):  
Roberto Ferraboli ◽  
Claudio Ruggieri

ECA procedures of crack-like defects based upon the FAD philosophy have undergone extensive developments in the past decade to form the basis for industrial codes and guidelines for structural integrity assessments. However, the application (and validation) of these procedures in defect assessments of structural components made of ductile materials under low constraint conditions remains a potential open issue. A central objective of this work is to assess the capability of the failure assessment diagram methodology to predict the failure pressure of ductile pipes with planar defects having different geometries. Specifically, the present work compares the burst pressure predictions for austenitic steel pipes with axial flaws derived from two widely used FAD procedures: BS7910 and API579. Such an application serves as a prototype for a wide class of integrity assessment problems involving the effects of strain hardening properties and ductility while, at the same time, assessing the robustness of FAD procedures in failure predictions. The direct application of BS 7910 procedure indicate rather large margins between the predicted and the actual (measured) failure pressures. In contrast, the API 579 procedure appears to provide better agreement with experimental data. Overall, the results validate the use of FAD-based methodologies for defect assessments of ductile pipes with axial crack-like flaws.


Author(s):  
Masayuki Kamaya ◽  
Kiminobu Hojo

Since the ductility of cast austenitic stainless steel pipes decreases due to thermal aging embrittlement after long term operation, not only plastic collapse failure but also unstable ductile crack propagation (elastic-plastic failure) should be taken into account for the structural integrity assessment of cracked pipes. In the ASME Section XI, the load multiplier (Z-factor) is used to derive the elastic-plastic failure of the cracked components. The Z-factor of cracked pipes under bending load has been obtained without considering the axial load. In this study, the influence of the axial load on Z-factor was quantified through elastic-plastic failure analyses under various conditions. It was concluded that the axial load increased the Z-factor; however, the magnitude of the increase was not significant, particularly for the main coolant pipes of PWR nuclear power plants.


Author(s):  
X. Wang ◽  
R. Bell ◽  
S. B. Lambert

The loss of crack tip constraint leads to enhanced resistance to both cleavage and ductile tearing. However, conventional failure assessment schemes (CEGB-R6, BS-7910) use lower bound toughness obtained from highly constrained test specimens. Cracks in many real engineering structures are not highly constrained, which makes failure predictions using conventional failure assessment schemes based on lower bound fracture toughness values overly pessimistic. Excessive pessimism in the structural assessment can lead to unwarranted repair or decommissioning of structures, and thus cause unneeded cost and inconvenience. Recent developments on constraint-based fracture mechanics have enabled the practical assessment of defective components including the constraint effect. For example, the recent revision of R6 and the newly developed structural integrity assessment procedures for European industry (SINTAP) have suggested a framework for failure assessments including the constraint effect. In this paper, the constraint-based failure assessment of surface cracked T-plate welded joints under tension load is presented. Different issues including the constraint-based failure assessment diagrams, the treatment of combining primary and the secondary loads, and the calculation of stress intensity factors, limit loads and constraint parameters for surface cracked T-plate joints are discussed. It is demonstrated that when the lower constraint effect is properly accounted for, the maximum allowable tensile stress level increases substantially.


2009 ◽  
Vol 131 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
S. J. Lewis ◽  
C. E. Truman ◽  
D. J. Smith

The influence of various assumptions on the modeling of cleavage fracture in the presence of residual stresses was investigated. Analyses were undertaken for modified single edge notched bend specimens, manufactured from A533B ferritic steel. The influence of residual stress fields, introduced by a method of in-plane compression, was investigated through the use of a modified J-integral, designed to retain path independence in the presence of initial stress and strain fields and nonproportional loading. Application of modified J values to predict fracture using probabilistic methods, and their use in a well-known structural integrity assessment code, showed that assumptions about levels of out-of-plane constraint, material hardening behavior, and the method of crack introduction have a significant influence on the conservatism of the resulting failure predictions. It was found that more realistic modeling of crack introduction had a major effect on the accuracy of failure predictions, with the effects of material hardening being of secondary importance.


Author(s):  
Xian-Kui Zhu

The J-integral is an important concept in the elastic-plastic fracture mechanics, and serves as a critical material parameter to quantify the toughness or resistance of ductile materials against fracture. The relation between the J-integral and crack extension has been widely used as the resistance curve of ductile materials in fracture mechanics design and in structural integrity assessment. Experimental testing and evaluation have played a central role in providing reliable fracture toughness properties to fracture mechanics analysis. Since the J-integral concept was proposed, extensive efforts of investigations have been made to develop its experimental estimation method, testing technique and standardization, as evident in the ASTM E1820 — a commonly used fracture toughness testing standard. In recent years, significant progresses of the J-integral fracture testing and experimental estimation have been achieved, and a part of them was accepted and updated in ASTM E1820. To better understand and use this fracture testing standard, the present paper gives a brief review of historical efforts and recent advances in the development of the J-integral experimental estimation and standard testing.


2008 ◽  
Vol 75 (10) ◽  
pp. 3038-3059 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergio Cicero ◽  
F. Gutiérrez-Solana ◽  
J.A. Álvarez

Author(s):  
X. Wang ◽  
W. Reinhardt

Conventional failure assessment schemes (CEGB-R6, BS-7910) use a lower bound toughness obtained from highly constrained test specimens. A lower crack tip constraint leads to enhanced resistance to both cleavage and ductile tearing. The cracks in many real engineering structures are not highly constrained, which makes failure predictions using conventional failure assessment schemes based on the lower bound fracture toughness overly conservative. Too much conservatism in the structural assessment can lead to unwarranted repair or decommissioning of structures, and thus cause unnecessary cost and inconvenience. Due to recent developments in constraint-based fracture mechanics, it is important to include the constraint effect in the practical assessment of defective components. For example, the recent revision of R6 and the newly developed structural integrity assessment procedures for European industry (SINTAP) have suggested a framework for failure assessments that can take the constraint effect into account. In this paper, the constraint-based failure assessment of a surface cracked welded plate under uniaxial tension load is presented. A constraint-based failure assessment diagram and a method for combining primary and the secondary loads are discussed. Finite element based correlations are used to calculate the stress intensity factors, and constraint parameters, while the limit loads are derived from existing closed form approximations. It is demonstrated that when the lower constraint effect is properly accounted for, the maximum allowable tensile stress level can increase 15% or more.


Author(s):  
Gustavo H. B. Donato ◽  
Claudio Ruggieri

ECA procedures of crack-like defects based upon the FAD philosophy have undergone extensive developments in the past decade to form the basis for industrial codes and guidelines for structural integrity assessments. However, the application of these procedures in welded structural components with mismatch in tensile properties between the weld and base metal remains a potential open issue. Weld strength mismatch may significantly alter the crack-tip driving forces, such as J and CTOD, thereby producing crack-tip stresses quite different than the fields that arise in corresponding homogeneous material. Weld strength mismatch also affects the plastic collapse load for the structural component which further complicates the interplay between fracture and plastic instability before gross yield section takes place. This work describes the development of a microme-chanics-based FAD methodology building upon a local fracture parameter, characterized by the Weibull stress (σw), to incorporate the effects of weld strength mismatch on crack-tip driving forces. As a further refinement, the study also addresses an exploratory application of a limit load analysis including effects of weld strength mismatch to correct the loading trajectory incorporated into the FAD procedure. Fracture testing of girth welds obtained from an API X80 pipeline steel provide the data needed to validate the proposed modified FAD procedure in failure predictions. Such an application serves as a prototype for a wide class of integrity assessment problems involving the effects of weld strength mismatch.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document