Eleven Cases of Co-infection with Influenza Type A and Type B Suspected by Use of a Rapid Diagnostic Kit and Confirmed by RT-PCR and Virus Isolation

2005 ◽  
Vol 79 (11) ◽  
pp. 877-886 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinichi TAKAO ◽  
Michimaru HARA ◽  
Osamu KAKUTA ◽  
Yukie SHIMAZU ◽  
Masaru KUWAYAMA ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type A ◽  
Type B ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xin Wang ◽  
Shisong Fang

ObjectiveTo determine avian influenza A(H5N6) virus infection in humanand environment using extensive surveillances. To evaluate theprevalence of H5N6 infection among high risk population.IntroductionSince the emergence of avian influenza A(H7N9) virus in 2013,extensive surveillances have been established to monitor the humaninfection and environmental contamination with avian influenza virusin southern China. At the end of 2015, human infection with influenzaA(H5N6) virus was identified in Shenzhen for the first time throughthese surveillances. These surveillances include severe pneumoniascreening, influenza like illness (ILI) surveillance, follow-up onclose contact of the confirmed case, serological survey among poultryworkers, environment surveillance in poultry market.MethodsSevere pneumonia screening was carried out in all hospitals ofShenzhen. When a patient with severe pneumonia is suspected forinfection with avian influenza virus, after consultation with at leasttwo senior respiratory physicians from the designated expert paneland gaining their approval, the patient will be reported to local CDC,nasal and pharyngeal swabs will be collected and sent for detectionof H5N6 virus by RT-PCR.ILI surveillance was conducted in 11 sentinel hospitals, 5-20 ILIcases were sampled for detection of seasonal influenza virus by RT-PCR test every week for one sentinel. If swab sample is tested positivefor influenza type A and negative for subtypes of seasonal A(H3N2)and A(H1N1), it will be detected further for influenza A(H5N6) virus.Follow-up on close contacts was immediately carried out whenhuman case of infection with H5N6 was identified. All of closecontacts were requested to report any signs and symptoms of acuterespiratory illness for 10 days, nasal and pharyngeal swabs werecollected and tested for influenza A(H5N6) virus by RT-PCR test.In the meantime, environmental samples were collected in the marketwhich was epidemiologically associated with patient and tested forH5N6 virus by RT-PCR test.Serological survey among poultry workers was conducted in tendistricts of Shenzhen. Poultry workers were recruited in poultrymarkets and screened for any signs and symptoms of acute respiratoryillness, blood samples were collected to detect haemagglutination-inhibition (HI) antibody for influenza A(H5N6) virus.Environment surveillance was conducted twice a month in tendistricts of Shenzhen. For each district, 10 swab samples werecollected at a time. All environmental samples were tested forinfluenza A(H5N6) virus by RT-PCR test.ResultsFrom Nov 1, 2015 to May 31, 2016, 50 patients with severepneumonia were reported and detected for H5N6 virus, three patientswere confirmed to be infected with H5N6 virus. Case 1 was a 26 yearsold woman and identified on Dec 29, 2015. She purchased a duck ata live poultry stall of nearby market, cooked and ate the duck 4 daysbefore symptom onset. After admission to hospital on Dec 27, hercondition deteriorated rapidly, on Dec 30 she died. The case 2 was a25 years old man and confirmed on Jan 7, 2016. He visited a marketeveryday and had no close contact with poultry, except for passingby live poultry stalls. He recovered and was discharged from hospitalon Jan 22. The case 3 was is a 31 years old woman and reported onJan 16, 2016, she had no contact with live poultry and died on Feb 8.For 60 close contacts of three cases, none of them reported signsor symptoms of acute respiratory illness, all of nasal and pharyngealswabs were tested negative for influenza A(H5N6) virus by RT-PCRtest. Of 146 environmental swabs collected in the case’s living placesand relevant poultry markets, 38 were tested positive for influenzaA(H5N6) virus by RT-PCR test.From Nov 1, 2015 to May 31, 2016, 2812 ILI cases were sampledand tested for influenza type A and subtypes of seasonal influenza.Those samples tested positive for influenza type A could be furthersubtyped to seasonal A(H3N2) or A(H1N1), therefore no sample fromILI case was tested for influenza A(H5N6) virus.Serological surveys among poultry workers were conductedtwice, for the first survey 186 poultry workers were recruited in Oct2015, for the second survey 195 poultry workers were recruited inJan 2016. Blood sample were collected and tested for HI antibodyof influenza A(H5N6) virus. 2 individuals had H5N6 HI antibodytiter of 1:40, 5 individuals had H5N6 HI antibody titer of 1:20, rest ofthem had H5N6 HI antibody titer of <1:20. According to the WHOguideline, HI antibody titer of≥1:160 against avian influenza viruswere considered positive.From Nov 1, 2015 to May 31, 2016, of 1234 environmental swabscollected in poultry markets, 339 (27.5%)were tested positive forinfluenza A(H5N6) virus by RT-PCR test. Each of the ten districtshad poultry markets which was contaminated by influenza A(H5N6)virus.ConclusionsIn 2015-2016 winter, three cases of infection with influenzaA(H5N6) virus were identified in Shenzhen, all of them were youngindividuals with average age of 27.3 years and developed severepneumonia soon after illness onset, two cases died. For acute andsevere disease, early detection and treatment is the key measure forpatient’s prognosis.H5N6 virus was identified in poultry market and other placeswhere patient appeared, implying poultry market probably was thesource of infection. Despite the high contamination rate of H5N6virus in poultry market, we found that the infection with H5N6 virusamong poultry workers was not prevalent, with infection rate being0/381. Human infection with H5N6 virus seemed to be a sporadicoccurrence, poultry-human transmission of H5N6 virus might not bevery effective.


2017 ◽  
Vol 07 (01) ◽  
pp. 12-28
Author(s):  
Timothy Byaruhanga ◽  
Bernard Bagaya ◽  
Joyce Namulondo ◽  
John Timothy Kayiwa ◽  
Barbara Namagambo ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 148 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 100-105
Author(s):  
Mioljub Ristic ◽  
Vladimir Petrovic

Introduction/Objective. A case definition recommended by the World Health Organization is commonly used for influenza surveillance worldwide. The aim of this study was to evaluate prognostic values of proposed case definitions of Influenza Like Illness (ILI), Severe Acute Respiratory Illness (SARI) and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) for laboratory confirmed-influenza and to compare the age distribution of influenza patients across virus types and subtypes in Vojvodina. Methods. We conducted a descriptive epidemiological study using surveillance reports and laboratory data from October 1, 2010 to May 20, 2017 (seven surveillance seasons). Results. We included 2,937 participants, 48.6% of whom were laboratory-confirmed influenza cases, and most of the confirmed cases (30.1%) were detected in February. In the 15?29 years age group, the type A influenza (H3N2) was more frequent among patients with ILI (54.9% vs. 34.2%, p = 0.040), and less frequent in patients with SARI (39.4% vs. 65.8%, p = 0.009) compared with influenza type B. In patients aged 30?64 years with ARDS, influenza type B was more common than influenza type A (H3N2) (13.4% vs. 6.2%, p = 0.032), but less common in compared to influenza type A (H1N1) pdm09 (13.4% vs. 25.7%, p = 0.017). The SARI case definition of influenza was associated with an increased likelihood of laboratoryconfirmed influenza for all age groups (p < 0.05). During the epidemic period, it was observed that the ILI case definition had the highest diagnostic value for influenza in the age group 5?14 (AUC = 0.733; 95% CI: 0.704?0.764), while the SARI and ARDS case definitions were the best predictors of influenza for patients 15?29 years of age (AUC = 0.565; 95% CI: 0.504?0.615 and AUC = 0.708; 95% CI: 0.489?0.708, respectively). The case definition of ARDS had the maximum sensitivity (100%) among patients 15?29 years of age. Conclusion. The proposed case definitions of influenza appeared to be good predictors of influenza and therefore can be useful for influenza surveillance, especially in the countries with limited laboratory capacities.


Plant Disease ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 90 (9) ◽  
pp. 1261-1261 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Borodynko

Beet necrotic yellow vein virus (BNYVV) is the type member of the genus Benyvirus and the causal agent of rhizomania disease of sugar beet. Since 1999, BNYVV is becoming one of the most important viruses of sugar beet in Poland. BNYVV is represented by three types, frequently A and B and rarely P, however, in Poland, type A only was recorded (2). In 2005, a survey was conducted to determine the incidence of types A and B of BNYVV in Poland. Thirty samples of sugar beet plants with rhizomania-like symptoms were collected from six fields in the western, southern, and northern areas of Poland. All samples were analyzed by double antibody sandwich-enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (DAS-ELISA) with commercial antiserum (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Infection of BNYVV was found in 26 samples. The presence of the virus in these samples was confirmed by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The total RNA extracted from sugar beet was tested with specific primers designed to amplify a fragment of the RNA2 for BNYVV (1). Multiplex (m) RT-PCR with two sets of primers, rhizo AF/rhizo AR and rhizo BF/rhizo BR (2), was used to distinguish A and B types of BNYVV. Two obtained mRT-PCR products were sequenced and compared with other sequences available in GenBank. A 121-nt amplicon sequence (GenBank Accession No. DQ 228872) had 100% nucleotide and amino acid sequence identity with all BNYVV type B sequences (e.g., Stourton-GenBank Accession No. AY682695) (2). A 171-nt amplicon sequence (GenBank Accession No. DQ228871) had 100% nucleotide and amino acid sequence identity with all BNYVV type A sequences (e.g., Ravenna-GenBank Accession No. AY 654282) (2). Type A was detected in 23 BNYVV-infected sugar beet plants from five fields located in western and southern Poland while type B was found in three samples from one field in northern Poland. To my knowledge, this is the first report of the natural occurrence of BNYVV type B in Poland. References: (1) A. Maunier et al. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69:2356, 2003. (2) C. Ratti et al. J. Virol. Methods 124:41, 2005.


2002 ◽  
Vol 76 (11) ◽  
pp. 946-952 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keiko MITAMURA ◽  
Norio SUGAYA ◽  
Mari NIRASAWA ◽  
Masayoshi SHINJOH ◽  
Yoshinao TAKEUCHI
Keyword(s):  
Type A ◽  
Type B ◽  

Virology ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 264 (2) ◽  
pp. 265-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anita A. Ghate ◽  
Gillian M. Air
Keyword(s):  
Type A ◽  
Type B ◽  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masaya Masayoshi Saito ◽  
Nobuo Hirotsu ◽  
Hiroka Hamada ◽  
Mio Takei ◽  
Keisuke Honda ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Influenza is a public health issue that needs to be addressed strategically and assessment of detailed infectious profiles is important for that. Household transmission data have played a key role for estimating these profiles. From one clinic’s influenza diagnostic and questionnaire-based data, we aimed to estimate the detailed infectious period (incubation, symptomatic and infective, and extended infective after recovery) and secondary attack ratio (SAR) for each household size of influenza by using modified Cauchemez-type model.Results The data source was derived from enrolled patients with confirmed influenza who were treated at the Hirotsu Clinic (Kawasaki, Japan) with a neuraminidase inhibitor (NAI) during the 6 Northern Hemisphere influenza seasons between 2010 and 2016. A total of 2,342 outpatients representing 1,807 households were included. For influenza type A, average incubation period and its 95% probability interval was 1.43 (0.03-5.32) days. Estimated average symptomatic and infective period was 1.76 (0.33-4.62) days and point estimated extended infective period after recovery was 0.25 days. Estimated SAR elevated from 20% to 32% as household size increases from 3 to 5. For influenza type B, average incubation period, average symptomatic and infective period, and extended infective period were estimated 1.66 (0.21-4.61) days, 2.62 (0.54-5.75) days and 1.00 days, respectively. SAR was increased 12% to 21% as household size increases from 3 to 5.Conclusion All estimated periods of influenza type B were longer than those of influenza type A. On the other hands, SAR of type B was less than that of type A. These results may reflect Japanese demographics and treatment policy. It is useful to understand the infectious profiles of influenza for examining public health measures.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document