SU-F-T-254: Dose Volume Histogram (DVH) Analysis of Breath Hold Vs Free Breathing Techniques for Esophageal Tumors

2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (6Part16) ◽  
pp. 3520-3521
Author(s):  
R Badkul ◽  
K Doke ◽  
D Pokhrel ◽  
N Aguilera ◽  
C Lominska
Keyword(s):  
Free Breathing ◽  
Breath Hold ◽  
Dose Volume Histogram ◽  
Breathing Techniques ◽  
Dose Volume ◽  
Esophageal Tumors

Degree of reduction in normal liver complication probability from free-breathing to breath-hold liver SBRT: A dose-escalation strategy using radiation dose-volume effect

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deepak Thaper ◽  
Hanuman Yadav ◽  
Deepti Sharma ◽  
Rose Kamal ◽  
Gaganpreet Singh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Dose ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Normal Liver ◽  
Free Breathing ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Breath Hold ◽  
Degree Of Reduction ◽  
Dose Volume ◽  
Liver Sbrt ◽  
Liver Complication

Abstract Introduction: This study aimed to analyze the degree of reduction in normal liver complication probability (NTCP) from free-breathing (FB) to breath-hold (BH) liver SBRT. The effect of the radiation dose-volume on the mean liver dose (MLD) was also analyzed due to dose prescription, normal liver volume (NLV), and PTV. Materials and Methods: Thirty-three stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) cases of hepatocellular carcinoma were selected, retrospectively. For FB, the treatments were planned on average intensity projection scan (CTavg), and patient-specific internal target volume (ITV) margins were applied. To simulate the BH treatment, computed tomography (CT) scan correspond to the 40% - 50% of the respiratory cycle (CT40%-50%) was chosen, and an appropriate intrafraction margin of 2 mm, 1.5 mm, and 1.5 mm were given in craniocaudal (CC), superior-inferior (SI), and lateral direction to generate the final iGTV. As per RTOG 1112, all organs at risk (OAR’s) were considered during the optimization of treatment plans. NTCP was calculated using LKB fractionated model. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to see the effect of EQD2Gy, NLV, and PTV on MLD2Gy. Results: A significant dosimetric difference was observed in the normal liver (liver-ITV/iGTV). A reduction of 1.7% in NTCP was observed from FB to BH technique. The leverage of dose escalation is more in BH because MLD2Gy corresponds to 5%, 10%, 20%, and 50% NTCP was 0.099 Gy, 0.41 Gy, 1.21 Gy, and 3.432 Gy more in BH as compared to FB technique. In MVRA, the major factor which was attributed to a change in MLD2Gy is EQD2Gy. Conclusion: From FB to BH technique, a significant reduction in NTCP was observed. The dose prescription is a major factor attributed to the change in MLD2Gy. Advances in knowledge: If feasible, prefer BH treatment either for tumor dose escalation or for the reduction in NTCP.

Comparison of breath-hold and free-breathing quantitative pulmonary perfusion MRI

Pneumologie ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 66 (06) ◽  
Author(s):  
D Maxien ◽  
M Ingrisch ◽  
F Meinel ◽  
S Thieme ◽  
MF Reiser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Free Breathing ◽  
Perfusion Mri ◽  
Breath Hold ◽  
Pulmonary Perfusion

scholarly journals Deep-inspirational breath-hold (DIBH) technique in left-sided breast cancer: various aspects of clinical utility

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Szilvia Gaál ◽  
Zsuzsanna Kahán ◽  
Viktor Paczona ◽  
Renáta Kószó ◽  
Rita Drencsényi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Clinical Utility ◽  
Prospective Trial ◽  
Conformal Radiotherapy ◽  
Free Breathing ◽  
Left Breast ◽  
Breath Hold ◽  
Ipsilateral Lung ◽  
Breast Cancer Radiotherapy

Abstract Background Studying the clinical utility of deep-inspirational breath-hold (DIBH) in left breast cancer radiotherapy (RT) was aimed at focusing on dosimetry and feasibility aspects. Methods In this prospective trial all enrolled patients went through planning CT in supine position under both DIBH and free breathing (FB); in whole breast irradiation (WBI) cases prone CT was also taken. In 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) plans heart, left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD), ipsilateral lung and contralateral breast doses were analyzed. The acceptance of DIBH technique as reported by the patients and the staff was analyzed; post-RT side-effects including radiation lung changes (visual scores and lung density measurements) were collected. Results Among 130 enrolled patients 26 were not suitable for the technique while in 16, heart or LAD dose constraints were not met in the DIBH plans. Among 54 and 34 patients receiving WBI and postmastectomy/nodal RT, respectively with DIBH, mean heart dose (MHD) was reduced to < 50%, the heart V25 Gy to < 20%, the LAD mean dose to < 40% and the LAD maximum dose to about 50% as compared to that under FB; the magnitude of benefit was related to the relative increase of the ipsilateral lung volume at DIBH. Nevertheless, heart and LAD dose differences (DIBH vs. FB) individually varied. Among the WBI cases at least one heart/LAD dose parameter was more favorable in the prone or in the supine FB plan in 15 and 4 cases, respectively; differences were numerically small. All DIBH patients completed the RT, inter-fraction repositioning accuracy and radiation side-effects were similar to that of other breast RT techniques. Both the patients and radiographers were satisfied with the technique. Conclusions DIBH is an excellent heart sparing technique in breast RT, but about one-third of the patients do not benefit from that otherwise laborious procedure or benefit less than from an alternative method. Trial registration: retrospectively registered under ISRCTN14360721 (February 12, 2021)

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document