Athletic Identity and Sports Participation in People with Spinal Cord Injury

2004 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 364-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomasz Tasiemski ◽  
Paul Kennedy ◽  
Brian P. Gardner ◽  
Rachel A. Blaikley

The aims of this study were to investigate “athletic identity” in people with spinal cord injury (SCI), using the Athletic Identity Measurement Scale (AIMS), to evaluate the psychometric properties of the 7-item version, and to identify reasons for and barriers to sports participation in this population. People with SCI (N = 678), even those competing as athletes, reported lower levels of athletic identity than able-bodied adults and adolescents with physical disabilities. AIMS scores varied according to gender, athlete status, and hours of sports participation per week. No relationship was found between athletic identity and depression, anxiety, or life satisfaction. Exploratory factor analysis did not support the 3-factor structure of the AIMS with this population, although internal consistency was good.

2011 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 233-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomasz Tasiemski ◽  
Britton W. Brewer

This study examined interrelationships among athletic identity, sport participation, and psychological adjustment in a sample of people with spinal cord injury (SCI). Participants (N = 1,034) completed measures of athletic identity, life satisfaction, anxiety, depression, and demographic and sport participation variables. Current amount of weekly sport participation was positively related to athletic identity when statistically controlling for age, gender, and pre-SCI amount of weekly sport participation. Being able to practice one’s favorite sport after SCI was associated with higher levels of athletic identity and better psychological adjustment. Team sport participants reported experiencing better psychological adjustment than individual sport participants did. The findings suggest that social factors are important in the link between sport participation and psychological adjustment in people with SCI.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Mikhail Saltychev ◽  
Janne Lähdesmäki ◽  
Petteri Jokinen ◽  
Katri Laimi

Objective. To evaluate the factor structure of Functional Independence Measure (FIM®) scale amongst people with spinal cord injury (SCI). Methods. This was a retrospective, register-based cohort study on 155 rehabilitants with SCI. FIM was assessed at the beginning and at the end of multidisciplinary inpatient rehabilitation. The internal consistency of the FIM was assessed with Cronbach’s alpha and exploratory factor analysis was employed to approximate the construct structure of FIM. Results. The internal consistency demonstrated high Cronbach’s alpha of 0.95 to 0.96. For both pre- and postintervention assessments, the exploratory factor analysis resulted in 3-factor structures. Except for two items (“walking or using a wheelchair” and “expression”), the structures of the identified three factors remained the same from the beginning to the end of rehabilitation. The loadings of all items were sufficient, exceeding 0.3. Both pre- and postintervention chi-square tests showed significant p values < 0.0001. The “motor” domain was divided into two factors with this 2-factor structure enduring through the intervention period. Conclusions. Amongst rehabilitants with SCI, FIM failed to demonstrate unidimensionality. Instead, it showed a 3-factor structure that fluctuated only little depending on the timing of measurement. Additionally, when measured separately, also motor score was 2-dimensional, not 1-dimensional. Using a total or subscale FIM, scores seem to be unjustified in the studied population.


2021 ◽  
pp. 003435522199073
Author(s):  
Chungyi Chiu ◽  
Jessica Brooks ◽  
Alicia Jones ◽  
Kortney Wilcher ◽  
Sa Shen ◽  
...  

Resilience is central to living well with a spinal cord injury (SCI). To provide a timely, targeted, and individualized intervention supporting resilience, it is necessary to assess an individual’s resilience level and characteristics of resilience on an ongoing basis. We aimed to validate the different types of resilient coping among people with SCI (PwSCI), using the Connor–Davidson resilience scale, and to identify the relationships between resilience and other psychosocial factors among the types of resilient coping. We recruited 93 PwSCI, who took the self-report measures of resilience, depression, life satisfaction, and spirituality. Using latent class analysis, we found three types: (a) goal-pursuing, bouncing-back, and persevering, named GP; (b) uncertainty about coping with setbacks, named UC; and (c) loss of resilient coping, named LOSS. The multivariate tests indicated that the three types differed on a linear combination of resilience, depression, and life satisfaction, with a large effect size. We discussed the three types of resilient coping and the implications for psychosocial interventions. We also recommended that rehabilitation clinicians examine PwSCI’s resilience levels and types of resilience during initial and follow-up visits. In doing so, PwSCI will have timely, targeted supports for developing and/or re-building their resilience.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (88) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kęstutis Skučas

Research background and hypothesis. Studies have shown that persons after spinal cord injury rarely continue participating in sport (Stryker, Burke, 2000; Hanson, Nabavi, 2001; Stephan, Brewer, 2007). This could be caused by the obstacles that the persons face due to the motor disorder after spinal cord injury (Wu, Williams, 2001; Tasiemski et al., 2004). Hypothesis: persons with spinal cord injury while being involved in disabled sport face the same problems irrespectively of gender. Research aim was to determine the obstacles and possibilities for involvement and participation in sport after spinal cord injury.Research methods. The questionnaire method was used to collect sport participation data (Tasiemski et al., 2004) and determine socialization agents of persons after spinal cord injury (Williams, 1994). The athletic identity assessment scale (Brewer, Cornelius, 2002) was used in the research. Research results. Data showed that the majority of the subjects after spinal cord injury were not involved in sport; 11.9% did sports 1 hour per week, 13.2% – 2–3 hours per week, 10.6% – more than 6 hours per week. The value of athletic identity of paraplegic subjects was equal to 23 points, and that of tetraplegic subjects – 18 points (statistically significant data difference between the two groups when p < 0.05). It was found that athletic identity value of men after spinal cord injury (22 points) was statistically significantly higher compared to that of women (16 points, p < 0.05). Lack of adapted sport facilities – 49.6%, equipment – 53.2%, coaches – 48.4% and financial resources – 42.0% proved to be the major obstacles to participate in sport for persons after spinal cord injury.    Discussion and conclusions. According to the research, only a minority of persons after spinal cord injury identified  themselves  as  athletes.  It  was  found  that  the  main  social  agents  involving  disabled  persons  into  the mainstream of sport were other disabled persons, rehabilitation and physical therapists, coaches and other sports professionals.  Persons  after  spinal  cord  injury  believed  that  the  main  reasons  of  non-participation  in  sport  was lack  of  information  about  disabled  sport,  also  lack  of  sports  equipment,  financial  problems    and  lack  of  sports professionals. Most persons after spinal cord injury participated or would participate in sport with the aim of getting fit, strengthening the upper body part, socializing, feeling the joy of life. The majority of results of the study were similar to the results of other researchers (Tasiemski et al., 2004) who analyzed disabled persons’ problems while involving in sport.Keywords: involvement in disabled sport, athletic identity, social agents.


2007 ◽  
Vol 29 (18) ◽  
pp. 1417-1422 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Larsson Lund ◽  
Anders Nordlund ◽  
Birgitta Bernspång ◽  
Jan Lexell

Spinal Cord ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 295-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
A M Lannem ◽  
M Sørensen ◽  
K F Frøslie ◽  
N Hjeltnes

Author(s):  
Oshin Amberkar ◽  
Bela Agarwal ◽  
Yuvraj Singh ◽  
Ruturaj Shete ◽  
Rajani Mullerpatan

2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (14) ◽  
pp. 2067-2075 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maziah Mat Rosly ◽  
Mark Halaki ◽  
Hadi Mat Rosly ◽  
Glen M. Davis ◽  
Nazirah Hasnan ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document