scholarly journals Errors in Shoulder Joint Position Sense Mainly Come from the Glenohumeral Joint

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yin-Liang Lin ◽  
Andrew Karduna
Keyword(s):  
Shoulder Joint ◽  
Glenohumeral Joint ◽  
Position Sense ◽  
Joint Position Sense ◽  
Joint Position ◽  
Active Joint ◽  
Angle Effect ◽  
Shoulder Complex ◽  
Predictive Relationship ◽  
Scapular Plane

While synchronous movement of the glenohumeral and scapulothoracic joints has been emphasized in previous kinematics studies, most investigations of shoulder joint position sense have treated the shoulder complex as a single joint. The purposes of this study were to investigate the joint position sense errors of the humerothoracic, glenohumeral, and scapulothoracic joints at different elevation angles and to examine whether the errors of the glenohumeral and scapulothoracic joints contribute to the errors of the humerothoracic joint. Fifty-one subjects with healthy shoulders were recruited. Active joint position sense of the humerothoracic, glenohumeral, and scapulothoracic joints was measured at 50°, 70°, and 90° of humerothoracic elevation in the scapular plane. The results showed that while scapulothoracic joint position sense errors were not affected by target angles, there was an angle effect on humerothoracic and glenohumeral errors, with errors decreasing as the target angles approached 90° of elevation. The results of a multiple regression analysis revealed that glenohumeral errors explained most of the variance of the humerothoracic errors and that scapulothoracic errors had a weaker predictive relationship with humerothoracic errors. Therefore, it may be necessary to test scapular joint position sense separately in addition to the assessment of the overall shoulder joint position sense.

Erratum: Lin and Karduna (2017)

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 474
Keyword(s):  
Shoulder Joint ◽  
Glenohumeral Joint ◽  
Position Sense ◽  
Joint Position Sense ◽  
Online Version ◽  
Joint Position ◽  
Link Type

In the article by Lin Y-L and Karduna A, “Errors in Shoulder Joint Position Sense Mainly Come from the Glenohumeral Joint,” in J Appl Biomech. 33(1):32–38, https://doi.org/10.1123/jab.2016-0034, Figure 3c was a duplicate of Figure 3b and was therefore incorrect. The online version of this article has been corrected; we apologize for this error.

scholarly journals Shoulder Joint Position Sense in Thoracic Outlet Syndrome

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (01) ◽  
pp. 178
Author(s):  
C. Sayaca ◽  
F. Eyuboglu ◽  
M. Çalık ◽  
H. Guney-Deniz ◽  
T. Fırat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Shoulder Joint ◽  
Thoracic Outlet Syndrome ◽  
Position Sense ◽  
Joint Position Sense ◽  
Joint Position

Effect of Load, Angle, and Contraction Type on Clinically Assessed Knee Joint Position Sense

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Adam L. Haggerty ◽  
Janet E. Simon ◽  
Dustin R. Grooms ◽  
Jeffrey A. Russell
Keyword(s):  
Body Position ◽  
Eccentric Contraction ◽  
Position Sense ◽  
Joint Position Sense ◽  
Joint Position ◽  
Active Joint ◽  
Concentric Contraction ◽  
Target Angle ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Contraction Type

Context: Proprioception is an individual’s awareness of body position in 3-dimensional space. How proprioceptive acuity changes under varying conditions such as joint position, load, and concentric or eccentric contraction type is not well understood. In addition, a limitation of the variety of techniques to assess proprioception is the lack of clinically feasible methods to capture proprioceptive acuity. The purpose of this study was to implement a readily available instrument, a smartphone, in the clinical evaluation of knee active joint position sense and to determine how joint angle, joint loading, and quadriceps contraction type affect an individual’s active joint position sense. Design: Cross-over study. Methods: Twenty healthy, physically active university participants (10 women and 10 men: 21.4 [2.0] y; 1.73 [0.1] m; 70.9 [14.3] kg) were recruited. Individuals were included if they had no neurological disorder, no prior knee surgery, and no recent knee injury. The participants were given a verbal instruction to locate a target angle and then were tasked with reproducing the target angle without visual or verbal cues. An accelerometer application on a smartphone was used to assess the angle to the nearest tenth of a degree. Three variables, each with 2 levels, were analyzed in this study: load (weighted and unweighted), contraction type (eccentric and concentric), and joint position (20° and 70°). A repeated-measures analysis of variance was conducted to assess the within-subjects factors of load, contraction, and position. Results: A significant difference of 0.50° (0.19°) of greater error with eccentric versus concentric contraction (P = .02) type was identified. In addition, a significant interaction was found for contraction × position, with a mean increase in error of 0.98° (0.33°) at the 20° position when contracting eccentrically (P = .03). Conclusions: Contraction type, specifically eccentric contraction at 20°, showed significantly greater error than concentric contraction. This suggests that, during eccentric contractions of the quadriceps, there may be decreased proprioceptive sensitivity compared with concentric contractions.

The Efficacy of Modern Technology to Improve Healthy and Injured Shoulder Joint Position Sense

1999 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Semyon M. Slobounov ◽  
Shannon T. Poole ◽  
Robert F. Simon ◽  
Elena S. Slobounov ◽  
Jill A. Bush ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Shoulder Joint ◽  
Healthy Subjects ◽  
Position Sense ◽  
Joint Position Sense ◽  
Modern Technology ◽  
Shoulder Abduction ◽  
Joint Position ◽  
Reproduction Task ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Visualization Techniques

Assessment and enhancement of joint position sense is an inexact science at best. Anew method of evaluating and improving this sense using motion-tracking technology that incorporates computer visualization graphics was examined. Injured and healthy subjects were evaluated for their abilities to determine shoulder joint position, after abduction, in two tasks. The first was active reproduction of a passively placed angle. The second was visual reproduction of such an angle. A training protocol was added to determine the effectiveness of proprioceptive training in conjunction with 3-D visualization techniques. The primary findings were (a) a significant difference (p= .05) in the level of joint position sense in injured vs. healthy subjects; (b) significantly less accurate reproduction of larger shoulder abduction vs. the smaller movement in the active reproduction task; (c) significantly greater ability to accurately reproduce angles actively vs. visually; and (d) that proprioception training using 3-D visualization techniques significantly increased activeandvisual reproductions of passively placed angles.

Shoulder Joint Position Sense in Injured and Noninjured Judo Athletes

2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 29-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carly May Green ◽  
Paul Comfort ◽  
Lee Herrington
Keyword(s):  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Shoulder Joint ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Position Sense ◽  
Joint Position Sense ◽  
Average Error ◽  
Joint Position ◽  
Joint Stability ◽  
Shoulder Injury ◽  
Judo Athletes

Context:A reduction in joint position sense (JPS) is sometimes a consequence of shoulder injury that may adversely affect the ability to maintain dynamic joint stability.Objective:To compare shoulder JPS between previously injured and noninjured judokas.Design:Cohort study.Participants:Twenty-nine noninjured subjects (10.93 ± 3.45 years) and eleven injured subjects (15.09 ± 3.39 years).Main Outcome Measures:JPS was tested at 45° and 80°of shoulder external rotation at 90° of abduction.Results:No signifcant difference in JPS was found between previously injured and noninjured judokas at either joint position.Conclusion:Despite evidence that JPS acuity decreases following shoulder injury, this study did not demonstrate a difference in average error between previously injured and noninjured judokas. Uncontrolled confounding factors, such as age and time since injury, may have affected the results. Sport-specifc shoulder joint loading patterns may also be an important factor that affects JPS.

scholarly journals A Clinical Shoulder Proprioception Test Shows Good Reliability, and Decreased Shoulder Joint Position Sense Due to Local Fatigue in Handballers: A Repeated Measures Design

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Sutton ◽  
Marie Ohlsson ◽  
Ulrik Röijezon
Keyword(s):  
Shoulder Joint ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Position Sense ◽  
Joint Position Sense ◽  
Joint Position ◽  
Good Reliability ◽  
Repeated Measures Design ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Specialized Equipment

Abstract Background: Assessment of shoulder proprioception outside the laboratory in the absence of specialized equipment remains a challenge with field-based tests often lacking good reliability, validity and feasibility. This study aimed to enhance the knowledge base surrounding the assessment of shoulder proprioception and investigated the effect of fatigue on shoulder joint position sense (JPS) amongst amateur male handball players.Method: 27 healthy recreationally active participants and 13 amateur male handball players undertook two sessions of active JPS tests using laser pen technology and a calibrated 2-dimensional target to assess test-retest reliability. The active JPS test was then utilized on the subgroup of handball players who were subjected to five bouts of a repeated throwing task in order to investigate the effect of local fatigue on shoulder JPS. Results: The intraclass correlation coefficient for the active JPS test was 0.78 (95% CI = [0.57; 0.89]). Standard error of measurement between trials was 0.70° (range 0.57°-0.90°). For the throwing task, repeated measures analysis of variance revealed a significant interaction for arm x bout (F5=2.74, p=0.028) and a significant effect for arm (F1=5.85, p=0.034). Post hoc analysis showed a significant difference between throwing arm and non-throwing arm after throwing bout one (p=0.036), three (p=0.026) and four (p=0.041). Conclusion: Assessment of the active JPS test showed acceptable reliability and measurement error. Repeated throwing to fatigue decreased shoulder JPS in amateur male handball players which indicate validity of the test to identify reduced proprioception.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document