What’s Happening in Supervision of Student Teachers in Secondary Physical Education

1988 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah Tannehill ◽  
Dorothy Zakrajsek

This study describes the supervisory behaviors and practices of cooperating teachers in secondary physical education. Subjects were 18 cooperating teachers supervising student teachers from five colleges/universities in the Northwest. Two data collection instruments were used: a daily log and a weekly wrap-up report. Frequencies and percentages were computed on selected supervisory behaviors. Results indicated that cooperating teachers provided minimum feedback, held few supervisory conferences, and spent little time observing teaching.

2010 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-66
Author(s):  
Kelle L. MURPHY

LANGUAGE NOTE | Document text in English; abstract also in Chinese. The study was designed to examine the perceptions of relationships formed among members of the student teaching triad and to examine the perceptions of supervision of student teachers given by cooperating teachers and college supervisors. Participants (N = 24) included eight student teaching triads. The study was conducted over a 14-week student teaching experience. In-depth interviews and daily journals were employed as methods of data collection. It was found that training was not received by cooperating teachers and college supervisors and was based on experience. The coalition was formed between the student teacher and cooperating teacher. Expectations of cooperating teachers were higher and based on a pragmatic view whereas expectations of college supervisors were based on theory. 本文旨在探討實習教學與視學的關係,邀請得24位實習生進行14周的實習教學,初步結果顯示本科教師與大學講師對實習生存有不同的見解。


1996 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 279-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Linda Rikard ◽  
Mary Lou Veal

Twenty-three physical education cooperating teachers were interviewed in order to examine their preparation for becoming supervisors and their supervisory beliefs and practices. Most cooperating teachers had no formal preparation for their supervisory roles and shared no common technical language. Instead, they applied Lortie’s (1975) apprenticeship of observation by acquiring supervisory knowledge and images of supervision primarily from memories of their own student teaching supervision and their experiences as teachers. These cooperating teachers assumed one of three supervisory styles with student teachers: (a) “do it your way,” (b) “do it my way,” and (c) “we’ll do it together.” The feedback ranged from very little feedback to providing both positive and negative feedback to student teachers. This study indicates an urgent need to establish a model of systematic, data-based supervision for all cooperating teacher. Suggestions for changes in physical education supervision are included.


2011 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. e149-e157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth U. Grillo ◽  
Justine Fugowski

1986 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 35-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phyllis P. Shapiro ◽  
Agnes Teresa Sheehan

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 31
Author(s):  
Dwiyani Pratiwi

<p>This paper presents a review of the research literature on practicum. Since there have been changes in trends in Teaching Education since the 1960s that also influenced the shift of research topics on practicum, this paper first gives a short review of the research trends in general TE, changing from the teaching process-product paradigm to the investigation of teachers’ mental lives or cognition. Then the actual review will focus on the studies related to the teachers’ beliefs, perspectives, perceptions, understanding, and reasoning, and follows under these topics: student teachers learning, cooperating teachers, and school-university cooperation in the practicum. At the end of this paper, some future studies on teaching practicum are suggested.  </p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document