Global Collaboration Boosts Scientific Innovation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chieri Yamada ◽  
Bolormaa Tsedendamba ◽  
Amarbileg Shajbalidir ◽  
Teruko Horiuchi ◽  
Katsuko Suenaga ◽  
...  

Abstract Excessive radiation exposure has adverse effects on health. In Fukushima, psychological issues such as anxiety are still affecting people nine years after the Fukushima nuclear power plant accident in 2011. In light of the lessons learned from Fukushima communities, a joint Japanese and Mongolian research team introduced a community program to the Zuunbayan district in Mongolia, which is located near a uranium deposit, to promote good health by strengthening radiation emergency preparedness. The program, which commenced in 2017, aimed to increase community participation, education, information dissemination, and capacity of community preparedness. After two years a monitoring study showed that, out of 227 respondents, the proportions who thought that any level of radiation was dangerous decreased from 53.3% in 2017 to 33.9% in 2019. Moreover, half of the respondents knew that there were safe and unsafe radiation levels and that their community was safe. This global collaboration demonstrated that a lesson learned from a disaster can be applied to other countries and changed people’s recognition and behavior toward good health and disaster/emergency preparedness.


Nanoscale ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (16) ◽  
pp. 7332-7342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soňa Hermanová ◽  
Martin Pumera

Artificial, self-propelled micro- and nanomotors are small devices capable of autonomous movement, which are a powerful scientific innovation for solving various medical and environmental issues.


2013 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junlong Luo ◽  
Xiumin Du ◽  
Xiaochen Tang ◽  
Entao Zhang ◽  
Haijiang Li ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 273-291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison Shaw

This paper reports on one aspect of qualitative research on public understandings of food risks, focusing on lay understandings of genetically modified (GM) food in a UK context. A range of theoretical, conceptual, and empirical literature on food, risk, and the public understanding of science are reviewed. The fieldwork methods are outlined and empirical data from a range of lay groups are presented. Major themes include: varying “technical” knowledge of science, the relationship between knowledge and acceptance of genetic modification, the uncertainty of scientific knowledge, genetic modification as inappropriate scientific intervention in “nature,” the acceptability of animal and human applications of genetic modification, the appropriate boundaries of scientific innovation, the necessity for GM foods, the uncertainty of risks in GM food, fatalism about avoiding risks, and trust in “experts” to manage potential risks in GM food. Key discussion points relating to a sociological understanding of public attitudes to GM food are raised and some policy implications are highlighted.


Author(s):  
Florence Bietrix ◽  
Antoni L. Andreu ◽  
Giovanni Migliaccio ◽  
Anton E. Ussi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document