Rubella Virus: Inhibition in vitro by Amantadine Hydrochloride

Science ◽  
1964 ◽  
Vol 145 (3639) ◽  
pp. 1443-1444 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. F. Maassab ◽  
K. W. Cochran
Biochemistry ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 47 (14) ◽  
pp. 4276-4287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Scholz ◽  
Laurence Thirault ◽  
Peter Schaarschmidt ◽  
Toralf Zarnt ◽  
Elke Faatz ◽  
...  

1973 ◽  
Vol 289 (12) ◽  
pp. 604-606 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. H. Thong ◽  
Russell W. Steele ◽  
Monroe M. Vincent ◽  
Sally A. Hensen ◽  
Joseph A. Bellanti

1966 ◽  
Vol 122 (1) ◽  
pp. 236-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. H. Chang ◽  
P. S. Moorhead ◽  
J. G. Boue ◽  
S. A. Plotkin ◽  
J. M. Hoskins
Keyword(s):  
In Utero ◽  

1964 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Loddo ◽  
A. Garzia ◽  
W. Ferrari
Keyword(s):  

1981 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert W. Sidwell ◽  
Donald F. Smee

1974 ◽  
Vol 139 (3) ◽  
pp. 497-511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger Cappel ◽  
Ann Schluederberg ◽  
Robert H. Gifford ◽  
Dorothy M. Horstmann

A precipitating antigen, rho, was first detected in the blood of persons with rubella and in rubella virus-infected cell culture fluids (1). Partially purified antigens from both sources were examined and shown to have similar properties, although antigen from serum sedimented more heterogeneously, with estimated coefficients from 15 to 21 S, while that from culture fluids sedimented in the 11–14 S region. In each case, antigen was located in the ß-1 zone after electrophoresis in agarose, and at a density of 1.305 g/ml after centrifugation in CsCl. Stability characteristics were typical of protein antigens. Immunofluorescent microscopy revealed that rubella virus induced the appearance of rho antigen scattered throughout the cytoplasm of infected cells. When cells containing antigen were exposed for 24 h to 5 µg/ml actinomycin D rho was no longer detectable, indicating the probable cellular origin of the antigen. Also, titers in medium of infected cultures showed a reduction after actinomycin treatment, but levels of the virus-specified antigen, iota, were relatively unaffected. Rho appears to be a protein common to man and many animals. In vitro, it was induced by rubella virus and by adenovirus. In vivo, rho titers were shown to be elevated after rubella virus infection and, to a lesser extent, after infection with certain other viruses. High titers were also demonstrated in women late in pregnancy and in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. In man and the chimpanzee, the appearance and decline of rho in the blood after rubella virus infection were temporally similar to the patterns of CRP, although rho seemed to be a more sensitive indicator of infection. The data presented indicate that rho is a newly recognized acute phase protein inducible by certain virus infections and by other unidentified stimuli present prominently in pregnancy and rheumatoid arthritis.


2008 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 391-394 ◽  
Author(s):  
Baghdad Science Journal

The studies on the antiviral compound chalcone in vitro in both tissue and organ culture systems against rubella virus glass that this compound relatively non toxic to the cell culture and organ culture of the concentration of 8 ug/ml or less, chalcone have significantly antiviral activity against rubella virus in tissue culture and organ culture. We find that a concentration of 0.03ug/ml or more inhibit the IOOTCID50 of rubella virus. The therapeutic index (TI) used in this study to evaluate the drug, the (TI) which is the ratio of the dose of drug which is just toxic (Maximum tolerated dose) to the dose which is just effective (Minimum effective dose). If this index is one or less it not possible to use the drug under the conditions outlined without causing side effect, if the index is larger than the margin of safety is accordingly great, the TI of chalcone against rubella virus more than 70, therefore this compound if used in man have no side effect .


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document