scholarly journals Population Pharmacokinetics of Piperacillin following Continuous Infusion in Critically Ill Patients and Impact of Renal Function on Target Attainment

2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vibeke Klastrup ◽  
Anders Thorsted ◽  
Merete Storgaard ◽  
Steffen Christensen ◽  
Lena E. Friberg ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Pharmacokinetic changes are often seen in patients with severe infections. Administration by continuous infusion has been suggested to optimize antibiotic exposure and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target attainment for β-lactams. In an observational study, unbound piperacillin concentrations (n = 196) were assessed in 78 critically ill patients following continuous infusion of piperacillin-tazobactam (ratio 8:1). The initial dose of 8, 12, or 16 g (piperacillin component) was determined by individual creatinine clearance (CRCL). Piperacillin concentrations were compared to the EUCAST clinical breakpoint MIC for Pseudomonas aeruginosa (16 mg/liter), and the following PK/PD targets were evaluated: 100% free time (fT) > 1× MIC and 100% fT > 4× MIC. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed using NONMEM 7.4.3 consisting of a one-compartment disposition model with linear elimination separated into nonrenal and renal (linearly increasing with patient CRCL) clearances. Target attainment was predicted and visualized for all individuals based on the utilized CRCL dosing algorithm. The target of 100% fT > 1× MIC was achieved for all patients based on the administered dose, but few patients achieved the target of 100% fT > 4× MIC. Probability of target attainment for a simulated cohort of patients showed that increasing the daily dose by 4-g increments (piperacillin component) did not result in substantially improved target attainment for the 100% fT > 4× MIC target. To conclude, in patients with high CRCL combined with high-MIC bacterial infections, even a continuous infusion (CI) regimen with a daily dose of 24 g may be insufficient to achieve therapeutic concentrations.

2007 ◽  
Vol 51 (9) ◽  
pp. 3304-3310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samir G. Sakka ◽  
Anna K. Glauner ◽  
Jürgen B. Bulitta ◽  
Martina Kinzig-Schippers ◽  
Wolfgang Pfister ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Beta-lactams are regularly administered in intermittent short-term infusions. The percentage of the dosing interval during which free drug concentrations exceed the MIC (fT >MIC) is the measure of drug exposure that best correlates with clinical outcome for beta-lactams. Therefore, administration by continuous infusion has gained increasing interest recently. We studied 20 critically ill patients with nosocomial pneumonia and investigated whether continuous infusion with a reduced total dose, compared to the standard regimen of intermittent short-term infusion, results in a superior probability of target attainment as assessed by the fT >MIC value of imipenem. In this prospective, randomized, controlled clinical study, patients received either a loading dose of 1 g/1 g imipenem and cilastatin (as a short-term infusion) at time zero, followed by 2 g/2 g imipenem-cilastatin per 24 h as a continuous infusion for 3 days (n = 10), or 1 g/1 g imipenem-cilastatin three times per day as a short-term infusion for 3 days (total daily dose, 3 g/3 g; n = 10). Imipenem concentrations in plasma were determined by using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay. A two-compartment open model was employed for population pharmacokinetic modeling. We simulated 10,000 intensive-care-unit patients via Monte Carlo simulations for pharmacodynamic evaluation using the target 40% fT >MIC. The probability of target attainment by MIC for intermittent infusion was robust (>90%) up to MICs of 1 to 2 mg/liter. The corresponding value for continuous infusion was 2 to 4 mg/liter. Although all 20 patients had an fT >MIC of 100%, 3 patients died. Patient survival was best described by employing a sepsis-related organ failure assessment score as a covariate in a logistic regression analysis. Larger clinical trials are warranted for evaluation of continuous infusions at a reduced dose of imipenem for critically ill patients.


2017 ◽  
Vol 61 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Susanna Edith Medellín-Garibay ◽  
Silvia Romano-Moreno ◽  
Pilar Tejedor-Prado ◽  
Noelia Rubio-Álvaro ◽  
Aida Rueda-Naharro ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Pathophysiological changes involved in drug disposition in critically ill patients should be considered in order to optimize the dosing of vancomycin administered by continuous infusion, and certain strategies must be applied to reach therapeutic targets on the first day of treatment. The aim of this study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic model of vancomycin to determine clinical covariates, including mechanical ventilation, that influence the wide variability of this antimicrobial. Plasma vancomycin concentrations from 54 critically ill patients were analyzed simultaneously by a population pharmacokinetic approach. A nomogram for dosing recommendations was developed and was internally evaluated through stochastic simulations. The plasma vancomycin concentration-versus-time data were best described by a one-compartment open model with exponential interindividual variability associated with vancomycin clearance and the volume of distribution. Residual error followed a homoscedastic trend. Creatinine clearance and body weight significantly dropped the objective function value, showing their influence on vancomycin clearance and the volume of distribution, respectively. Characterization based on the presence of mechanical ventilation demonstrated a 20% decrease in vancomycin clearance. External validation (n = 18) was performed to evaluate the predictive ability of the model; median bias and precision values were 0.7 mg/liter (95% confidence interval [CI], −0.4, 1.7) and 5.9 mg/liter (95% CI, 5.4, 6.4), respectively. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed for the administration of vancomycin by continuous infusion to critically ill patients, demonstrating the influence of creatinine clearance and mechanical ventilation on vancomycin clearance, as well as the implications for targeting dosing rates to reach the therapeutic range (20 to 30 mg/liter).


2019 ◽  
Vol 52 ◽  
pp. 75-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sofie A.M. Dhaese ◽  
Alexander D.J. Thooft ◽  
Andras Farkas ◽  
Jeffrey Lipman ◽  
Alain G. Verstraete ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 60 (9) ◽  
pp. 5254-5261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Max Taubert ◽  
Michael Zoller ◽  
Barbara Maier ◽  
Sebastian Frechen ◽  
Christina Scharf ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTAdequate linezolid blood concentrations have been shown to be associated with an improved clinical outcome. Our goal was to assess new predictors of inadequate linezolid concentrations often observed in critically ill patients. Fifty-two critically ill patients with severe infections receiving standard dosing of linezolid participated in this prospective observational study. Serum samples (median, 32 per patient) were taken on four consecutive days, and total linezolid concentrations were quantified. Covariates influencing linezolid pharmacokinetics were identified by multivariate analysis and a population pharmacokinetic model. Target attainment (area under the concentration-time curve over 12 h [AUC12]/MIC ratio of >50; MIC = 2 mg/liter) was calculated for both the study patients and a simulated independent patient group (n= 67,000). Target attainment was observed for only 36% of the population on both days 1 and 4. Independent covariates related to significant decreases of linezolid concentrations included higher weight, creatinine clearance rates, and fibrinogen and antithrombin concentrations, lower concentrations of lactate, and the presence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Linezolid clearance was increased in ARDS patients (by 82%) and in patients with elevated fibrinogen or decreased lactate concentrations. In simulated patients, most covariates, including fibrinogen and lactate concentrations and weight, showed quantitatively minor effects on target attainment (difference of ≤9% between the first and fourth quartiles of the respective parameters). In contrast, the presence of ARDS had the strongest influence, with only ≤6% of simulated patients reaching this target. In conclusion, the presence of ARDS was identified as a new and strong predictor of insufficient linezolid concentrations, which might cause treatment failure. Insufficient concentrations might also be a major problem in patients with combined alterations of other covariate parameters. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration number NCT01793012.)


2012 ◽  
Vol 56 (12) ◽  
pp. 6343-6348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Federico Pea ◽  
Pierluigi Viale ◽  
Piergiorgio Cojutti ◽  
Mario Furlanut

ABSTRACTThe worrisome increase in Gram-negative bacteria with borderline susceptibility to carbapenems and of carbapenemase-producingEnterobacteriaceaehas significantly undermined their efficacy. Continuous infusion may be the best way to maximize the time-dependent activity of meropenem. The aim of this study was to create dosing nomograms in relation to different creatinine clearance (CLCr) estimates for use in daily clinical practice to target the steady-state concentrations (Csss) of meropenem during continuous infusion at 8 to 16 mg/liter (after the administration of an initial loading dose of 1 to 2 g over 30 min). The correlation between meropenem clearance (CLm) and CLCrwas retrospectively assessed in a cohort of critically ill patients (group 1,n= 67) to create a formula for dosage calculation to targetCss. The performance of this formula was validated in a similar cohort (group 2,n= 56) by comparison of the observed and the predictedCsss. A significant relationship between CLmand CLCrwas observed in group 1 (r= 0.72,P< 0.001). The application of the formula to meropenem dosing in group 2, infusion rate (g/24 h) = [0.078 × CLCr(ml/min) + 2.85] × targetCss× (24/1,000), led to a significant correlation between the observed and the predictedCsss (r= 0.92,P< 0.001). Dosing nomograms based on CLCrwere created to target the meropenemCssat 8, 12, and 16 mg/liter in critically ill patients. These nomograms could be helpful in improving the treatment of severe Gram-negative infections with meropenem, especially in the presence of borderline susceptible pathogens or even of carbapenemase producers and/or of pathophysiological conditions which may enhance meropenem clearance.


2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne-Grete Märtson ◽  
Kim C. M. van der Elst ◽  
Anette Veringa ◽  
Jan G. Zijlstra ◽  
Albertus Beishuizen ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic model and to determine a dosing regimen for caspofungin in critically ill patients. Nine blood samples were drawn per dosing occasion. Fifteen patients with (suspected) invasive candidiasis had one dosing occasion and five had two dosing occasions, measured on day 3 (±1) of treatment. Pmetrics was used for population pharmacokinetic modeling and probability of target attainment (PTA). A target 24-h area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) value of 98 mg·h/liter was used as an efficacy parameter. Secondarily, the AUC/MIC targets of 450, 865, and 1,185 were used to calculate PTAs for Candida glabrata, C. albicans, and C. parapsilosis, respectively. The final 2-compartment model included weight as a covariate on volume of distribution (V). The mean V of the central compartment was 7.71 (standard deviation [SD], 2.70) liters/kg of body weight, the mean elimination constant (Ke) was 0.09 (SD, 0.04) h−1, the rate constant for the caspofungin distribution from the central to the peripheral compartment was 0.44 (SD, 0.39) h−1, and the rate constant for the caspofungin distribution from the peripheral to the central compartment was 0.46 (SD, 0.35) h−1. A loading dose of 2 mg/kg on the first day, followed by 1.25 mg/kg as a maintenance dose, was chosen. With this dose, 98% of the patients were expected to reach the AUC target on the first day and 100% of the patients on the third day. The registered caspofungin dose might not be suitable for critically ill patients who were all overweight (≥120 kg), over 80% of median weight (78 kg), and around 25% of lower weight (≤50 kg). A weight-based dose regimen might be appropriate for achieving adequate exposure of caspofungin in intensive care unit patients.


2019 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fekade B. Sime ◽  
Melissa Lassig-Smith ◽  
Therese Starr ◽  
Janine Stuart ◽  
Saurabh Pandey ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT The aim of this work was to describe optimized dosing regimens of ceftolozane-tazobactam for critically ill patients receiving continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF). We conducted a prospective observational pharmacokinetic study in adult critically ill patients with clinical indications for ceftolozane-tazobactam and CVVHDF. Unbound drug concentrations were measured from serial prefilter blood, postfilter blood, and ultrafiltrate samples by a chromatographic assay. Population pharmacokinetic modeling and dosing simulations were performed using Pmetrics. A four-compartment pharmacokinetic model adequately described the data from six patients. The mean (± standard deviation [SD]) extraction ratios for ceftolozane and tazobactam were 0.76 ± 0.08 and 0.73 ± 0.1, respectively. The mean ± SD sieving coefficients were 0.94 ± 0.24 and 1.08 ± 0.30, respectively. Model-estimated CVVHDF clearance rates were 2.7 ± 0.8 and 3.0 ± 0.6 liters/h, respectively. Residual non-CVVHDF clearance rates were 0.6 ± 0.5 and 3.3 ± 0.9 liters/h, respectively. In the initial 24 h, doses as low as 0.75 g every 8 h enabled cumulative fractional response of ≥85% for empirical coverage against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, considering a 40% fT>MIC (percentage of time the free drug concentration was above the MIC) target. For 100% fT>MIC, doses of at least 1.5 g every 8 h were required. The median (interquartile range) steady-state trough ceftolozane concentrations for simulated regimens of 1.5 g and 3.0 g every 8 h were 28 (21 to 42) and 56 (42 to 84) mg/liter, respectively. The corresponding tazobactam concentrations were 6.1 (5.5 to 6.7) and 12.1 (11.0 to 13.4) mg/liter, respectively. We suggest a front-loaded regimen with a single 3.0-g loading dose followed by 0.75 g every 8 h for critically ill patients undergoing CVVHDF with study blood and dialysate flow rates.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document