scholarly journals Anti-Clumping Factor A Immunoglobulin Reduces the Duration of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia in an Experimental Model of Infective Endocarditis

2003 ◽  
Vol 47 (11) ◽  
pp. 3400-3406 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Vernachio ◽  
Arnold S. Bayer ◽  
Thuan Le ◽  
Yin-Li Chai ◽  
Bradley Prater ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Infective Endocarditis ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Rabbit Model ◽  
Human Fibrinogen ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia ◽  
Fibrinogen Binding ◽  
Human Polymorphonuclear Leukocytes

ABSTRACT SA-IGIV is a human polyclonal immunoglobulin containing elevated levels of antibodies specific for the fibrinogen-binding MSCRAMM protein clumping factor A (ClfA). In vitro, SA-IGIV specifically recognized ClfA that was expressed on the surface of Staphylococcus aureus and inhibited bacterial adherence to immobilized human fibrinogen by >95%. Moreover, SA-IGIV efficiently opsonized ClfA-coated fluorescent beads and facilitated phagocytosis by human polymorphonuclear leukocytes. To determine its potential therapeutic efficacy, SA-IGIV was evaluated in combination with vancomycin in a rabbit model of catheter-induced aortic valve infective endocarditis (IE) caused by methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). The combination therapy was more effective than vancomycin alone in sterilizing all valvular vegetations when used therapeutically during early (12-h) IE. The combination therapy resulted in clearance of bacteremia that was significantly faster than that of vancomycin alone in animals with well-established (24-h) IE. Therefore, in both early and well-established MRSA IE, the addition of SA-IGIV to a standard antibiotic regimen (vancomycin) increased bacterial clearance from the bloodstream and/or vegetations.

scholarly journals Adjunctive ceftaroline in combination with daptomycin or vancomycin for complicated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia after monotherapy failure

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 204993611988650 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph Patrik Hornak ◽  
Seher Anjum ◽  
David Reynoso
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Source Control ◽  
Optimal Timing ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia ◽  
Persistent Bacteremia

Background: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (MRSA-B) may fail to improve with standard monotherapy, particularly in patients with multifocal infection, incomplete source control, or persistent bacteremia. Synergy observed in vitro between ceftaroline (CPT) and daptomycin (DAP) or vancomycin (VAN) may translate into clinical benefit. Here, we describe our experience with DAP/CPT and VAN/CPT for complicated MRSA-B after monotherapy failure. Methods: Single-center, retrospective review of consecutive patients treated with DAP/CPT or VAN/CPT for MRSA-B after monotherapy failure from 1 January 2016 to 30 November 2018. Results: We identified 11 instances of combination therapy in 10 patients (DAP/CPT = 6, VAN/CPT = 5) with 1 patient receiving VAN/CPT followed by DAP/CPT. Rates of multifocal infection, incomplete source control, persistent bacteremia, and infective endocarditis were high (100%, 80%, 60%, and 60%, respectively). Combination therapy was initiated most commonly for persistent bacteremia (60%). When patients were persistently bacteremic, median preceding duration was 13 days and median time to clearance was 3 days. Total microbiologic cure rate was 100%. There were zero instances of bacteremia relapse at 30 days (30D) or 60 days (60D). All-cause 30D and 60D mortality rates were 11.1% and 33.3%, respectively. Conclusions: Combination therapy demonstrated success in diverse cases of refractory MRSA-B, including instances of persistent bacteremia paired with incomplete source control. Optimal timing and therapeutic cadence for combination therapy remain unclear. Our findings suggest that DAP/CPT and VAN/CPT can be considered for complicated MRSA bacteremia when other treatment options fail or are unavailable. We propose persistent bacteremia with incomplete source control to be a clinical niche particularly worthy of further investigation.

scholarly journals Comparison of Borate Bioactive Glass and Calcium Sulfate as Implants for the Local Delivery of Teicoplanin in the Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus-Induced Osteomyelitis in a Rabbit Model

2015 ◽  
Vol 59 (12) ◽  
pp. 7571-7580 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei-Tao Jia ◽  
Qiang Fu ◽  
Wen-Hai Huang ◽  
Chang-Qing Zhang ◽  
Mohamed N. Rahaman
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Bioactive Glass ◽  
Calcium Sulfate ◽  
Rabbit Model ◽  
Local Delivery ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Borate Bioactive Glass ◽  
Phosphate Buffered Saline

ABSTRACTThere is growing interest in biomaterials that can cure bone infection and also regenerate bone. In this study, two groups of implants composed of 10% (wt/wt) teicoplanin (TEC)-loaded borate bioactive glass (designated TBG) or calcium sulfate (TCS) were created and evaluated for their ability to release TECin vitroand to cure methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA)-induced osteomyelitis in a rabbit model. When immersed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), both groups of implants provided a sustained release of TEC at a therapeutic level for up to 3 to 4 weeks while they were gradually degraded and converted to hydroxyapatite. The TBG implants showed a longer duration of TEC release and better retention of strength as a function of immersion time in PBS. Infected rabbit tibiae were treated by debridement, followed by implantation of TBG or TCS pellets or intravenous injection with TEC, or were left untreated. Evaluation at 6 weeks postimplantation showed that the animals implanted with TBG or TCS pellets had significantly lower radiological and histological scores, lower rates of MRSA-positive cultures, and lower bacterial loads than those preoperatively and those of animals treated intravenously. The level of bone regeneration was also higher in the defects treated with the TBG pellets. The results showed that local TEC delivery was more effective than intravenous administration for the treatment of MRSA-induced osteomyelitis. Borate glass has the advantages of better mechanical strength, more desirable kinetics of release of TEC, and a higher osteogenic capacity and thus could be an effective alternative to calcium sulfate for local delivery of TEC.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Telavancin in a Rabbit Model of Aortic Valve Endocarditis Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus or Vancomycin-Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus

2005 ◽  
Vol 49 (8) ◽  
pp. 3163-3165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andres G. Madrigal ◽  
Li Basuino ◽  
Henry F. Chambers
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
No Reduction ◽  
Rabbit Model ◽  
Daily Regimen ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
Time Kill

ABSTRACT The activities of telavancin and vancomycin were compared in vitro and in the rabbit model of aortic valve endocarditis against a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain, COL, and a vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (VISA) strain, HIP 5836. Telavancin was bactericidal in time-kill studies at a concentration of 5 μg/ml against both COL and HIP5836. Vancomycin was bacteriostatic at 5 μg/ml and bactericidal at 10 μg/ml against COL and was bacteriostatic at 10 μg/ml against VISA strain HIP 5836. Compared to untreated controls, a twice-daily regimen of 30 mg/kg of telavancin reduced mean aortic valve vegetation titers of the COL strain by 4.7 log10 CFU/g after 4 days of therapy and sterilized 6/11 vegetations compared to 3.4 log10 CFU/g with 3/10 vegetations sterilized for a regimen of twice-daily vancomycin, 30 mg/kg; these differences were not statistically significant. Telavancin was significantly more effective than vancomycin in the VISA model, producing a 5.5 log10 CFU/g reduction versus no reduction in CFU with vancomycin. In experiments comparing 2-day regimens of telavancin at 30 mg/kg and 50 mg/kg twice daily, organisms were rapidly eliminated from vegetations, but the effect was not different between the two doses. These results suggest that telavancin may be an effective treatment for endocarditis and other serious staphylococcal infections accompanied by bacteremia, including infections caused by staphylococci not susceptible to vancomycin.

scholarly journals In VitroPharmacodynamics of Vancomycin and Cefazolin Alone and in Combination against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

2011 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 202-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mao Hagihara ◽  
Dora E. Wiskirchen ◽  
Joseph L. Kuti ◽  
David P. Nicolau
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Synergistic Effects ◽  
Bacterial Density ◽  
Bacterial Killing ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Vancomycin Mics ◽  
Time Kill

ABSTRACTPrevious studies employing time-kill methods have observed synergistic effects against methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA) when a β-lactam is combined with vancomycin. However, these time-kill studies have neglected the importance of human-simulated exposures. We evaluated the effect of human simulated exposures of vancomycin at 1 g every 8 h (q8h) in combination with cefazolin at 1 g q8h against various MRSA isolates. Four clinical isolates (two MRSA isolates [vancomycin MICs, 0.5 and 2.0 μg/ml], a heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediateS. aureus[hVISA] isolate [MIC, 2.0 μg/ml], and a vancomycin-intermediateS. aureus[VISA] isolate [MIC, 8.0 μg/ml]) were evaluated in anin vitropharmacodynamic model with a starting inoculum of 106or 108CFU/ml. Bacterial density was measured over 48 to 72 h. Time-kill curves were constructed, and the area under the bacterial killing and regrowth curve (AUBC) was calculated. During 106CFU/ml studies, combination therapy achieved greater log10CFU/ml changes than vancomycin alone at 12 h (−4.31 ± 0.58 versus −2.80 ± 0.59,P< 0.001), but not at 48 h. Combination therapy significantly reduced the AUBC from 0 to 48 h (122 ± 14) compared with vancomycin alone (148 ± 22,P= 0.017). Similar results were observed during 108CFU/ml studies, where combination therapy achieved greater log10CFU/ml changes at 12 h than vancomycin alone (−4.00 ± 0.20 versus −1.10 ± 0.04,P< 0.001) and significantly reduced the AUBC (275 ± 30 versus 429 ± 37,P< 0.001) after 72 h of incubation. In this study, the combination of vancomycin and cefazolin at human-simulated exposures improved the rate of kill against these MRSA isolates and resulted in greater overall antibacterial effect, but no differences in bacterial density were observed by the end of the experiments.

scholarly journals Comparative Efficacies of Tedizolid Phosphate, Vancomycin, and Daptomycin in a Rabbit Model of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Endocarditis

2015 ◽  
Vol 59 (6) ◽  
pp. 3252-3256 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liana C. Chan ◽  
Li Basuino ◽  
Etyene C. Dip ◽  
Henry F. Chambers
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Rabbit Model ◽  
Time Curve ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Concentration Time ◽  
Dose Ranging

ABSTRACTTedizolid, the active component of the prodrug tedizolid phosphate, is a novel oxazolidinone that is approximately 4 times more active by weight than linezolid againstStaphylococcus aureusin vitro. Thein vivoefficacy of tedizolid phosphate (15 mg/kg body weight intravenous [i.v.] twice a day [b.i.d.]) was compared to those of vancomycin (30 mg/kg i.v. b.i.d.) and daptomycin (18 mg/kg i.v. once a day [q.d.]) in a rabbit model of aortic valve endocarditis (AVE) caused by methicillin-resistantS. aureusstrain COL (infection inoculum of 107CFU). Median vegetation titers of daptomycin-treated rabbits were significantly lower than those of rabbits treated with tedizolid phosphate (15 mg/kg b.i.d.) (P= 0.016), whereas titers for vancomycin-treated compared to tedizolid-treated rabbits were not different (P= 0.984). The numbers of organisms in spleen and kidney tissues were similar for all treatment groups. A dose-ranging experiment was performed with tedizolid phosphate (2, 4, and 8 mg/kg b.i.d.) compared to vancomycin (30 mg/kg b.i.d.), using a higher infecting inoculum (108CFU) to determine the lowest efficacious dose of tedizolid phosphate. Tedizolid phosphate (2 mg/kg) (equivalent to 60% of the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC0–24) for the human 200-mg dose approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration) was not efficacious. Tedizolid phosphate at 4 mg/kg (equivalent to 75% of the AUC0–24for the human 400-mg dose) and 8 mg/kg produced lower vegetation titers than the control, but neither was as efficacious as vancomycin.

scholarly journals Focusing the Lens on the CAMERA Concepts: Early Combination β-Lactam and Vancomycin Therapy in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia

2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
H Andrew Wilsey ◽  
Donna R. Burgess ◽  
David S. Burgess
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Health Care Systems ◽  
Vancomycin Therapy ◽  
Initial Management ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia ◽  
Early Use ◽  
Care Systems

ABSTRACT Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has grown to become a major burden on health care systems. The cumulation of limited therapeutic options and worsened patient outcomes with persistent MRSA bacteremia has driven research in optimizing its initial management. The guidelines published by the Infectious Diseases Society of America currently recommend combination therapy for refractory MRSA bacteremia, but the utility of combining antibiotics from the start of therapy is under investigation. The alternative strategy of early use of β-lactam antibiotics in combination with vancomycin upon initial MRSA bacteremia detection has shown promise. While this concept has gained international attention, providers should give this strategy serious consideration prior to implementation. The objective of this review is to examine retrospective and prospective evidence for early combination with vancomycin and β-lactam antibiotics, as well as explore potential consequences of combination therapy.

scholarly journals Impact of the Combination of Daptomycin and Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole on Clinical Outcomes in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infections

2015 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 1969-1976 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberly C. Claeys ◽  
Jordan R. Smith ◽  
Anthony M. Casapao ◽  
Ryan P. Mynatt ◽  
Lisa Avery ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Signs And Symptoms ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Hospital Stays ◽  
Prolonged Hospital

ABSTRACTComplicatedStaphylococcus aureusinfections, including bacteremia, are often associated with treatment failures, prolonged hospital stays, and the emergence of resistance to primary and even secondary therapies. Daptomycin is commonly used as salvage therapy after vancomycin failure for the treatment of methicillin-resistantS. aureus(MRSA) infections. Unfortunately, the emergence of daptomycin resistance, especially in deep-seated infections, has been reported, prompting the need for alternative or combination therapy. Numerous antibiotic combinations with daptomycin have been investigated clinically andin vitro. Of interest, the combination of daptomycin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) has proved to be rapidly bactericidalin vitroto strains that are both susceptible and nonsusceptible to daptomycin. However, to date, there is limited clinical evidence supporting the use of this combination. This was a multicenter, retrospective case series of patients treated with the combination of daptomycin and TMP-SMX for at least 72 h. The objective of this study was to describe the safety and effectiveness of this regimen in clinical practice. The most commonly stated reason that TMP-SMX was added to daptomycin was persistent bacteremia and/or progressive signs and symptoms of infection. After the initiation of combination therapy, the median time to clearance of bacteremia was 2.5 days. Microbiological eradication was demonstrated in 24 out of 28 patients, andin vitrosynergy was demonstrated in 17 of the 17 recovered isolates. Further research with this combination is necessary to describe the optimal role and its impact on patient outcomes.

scholarly journals Addition of Gentamicin or Rifampin Does Not Enhance the Effectiveness of Daptomycin in Treatment of Experimental Endocarditis Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

2009 ◽  
Vol 53 (10) ◽  
pp. 4172-4177 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. Miró ◽  
C. García-de-la-Mària ◽  
Y. Armero ◽  
D. Soy ◽  
A. Moreno ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Statistical Difference ◽  
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Acquired Resistance ◽  
Rabbit Model ◽  
Human Pharmacokinetics ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Time Kill

ABSTRACT This study evaluated the activity of daptomycin combined with either gentamicin or rifampin against three methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) clinical isolates in vitro and one isolate in vivo against a representative strain (MRSA-572). Time-kill experiments showed that daptomycin was bactericidal against these strains at concentrations over the MIC. Daptomycin at sub-MIC concentrations plus gentamicin at 1× and 2× the MIC yielded synergy, while the addition of rifampin at 2 to 4 μg/ml resulted in indifference (two strains) or antagonism (one strain). The in vivo activity of daptomycin (6 mg/kg of body weight once a day) was evaluated ± gentamicin (1 mg/kg intravenously [i.v.] every 8 h [q8h]) or rifampin (300 mg i.v. q8h) in a rabbit model of infective endocarditis by simulating human pharmacokinetics. Daptomycin plus gentamicin (median, 0 [interquartile range, 0 to 2] log10 CFU/g vegetation) was as effective as daptomycin alone (0 [0 to 2] log10 CFU/g vegetation) in reducing the density of bacteria in valve vegetations (P = 0.83), and both were more effective than daptomycin plus rifampin (3 [2 to 3.5] log10 CFU/g vegetation; P < 0.05) for the strain studied. In addition, daptomycin sterilized a ratio of vegetations that was similar to that of daptomycin plus gentamicin (10/15 [67%] versus 9/15 [60%]; P = 0.7), and both regimens did so more than daptomycin plus rifampin (3/15 [20%]; P = 0.01 and P = 0.02, respectively). No statistical difference was noted between daptomycin plus gentamicin and daptomycin alone for MRSA treatment. In the combination arm, all isolates from vegetations remained susceptible to daptomycin, gentamicin, and rifampin. Sixty-one percent of the isolates (8/13) acquired resistance to rifampin during monotherapy. In the daptomycin arm, resistance was detected in only one case, in which the daptomycin MIC rose to 2 μg/ml among the recovered bacteria. In conclusion, the addition of gentamicin or rifampin does not enhance the effectiveness of daptomycin in the treatment of experimental endocarditis due to MRSA.

scholarly journals The Combination of Daptomycin and Fosfomycin Has Synergistic, Potent, and Rapid Bactericidal Activity against Methicillin-ResistantStaphylococcus aureusin a Rabbit Model of Experimental Endocarditis

2018 ◽  
Vol 62 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina García-de-la-Mària ◽  
Oriol Gasch ◽  
Javier García-Gonzalez ◽  
Dolors Soy ◽  
Evelyn Shaw ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Bactericidal Activity ◽  
Combined Therapy ◽  
Rabbit Model ◽  
Bactericidal Effect ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Mrsa Strains ◽  
Time Kill

ABSTRACTWe investigated whether the addition of fosfomycin or cloxacillin to daptomycin provides better outcomes in the treatment of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA) experimental aortic endocarditis in rabbits. Five MRSA strains were used to performin vitrotime-kill studies using standard (106) and high (108) inocula. Combined therapy was compared to daptomycin monotherapy treatment in the MRSA experimental endocarditis model. A human-like pharmacokinetics model was applied, and the equivalents of cloxacillin at 2 g/4 h, fosfomycin at 2 g/6 h, and daptomycin at 6 to 10 mg/kg/day were administered intravenously. A combination of daptomycin and either fosfomycin or cloxacillin was synergistic in the five strains tested at both inocula. A bactericidal effect was detected in four of five strains tested with both combinations. The MRSA-277 strain (vancomycin MIC, 2 μg/ml) was used for the experimental endocarditis model. Daptomycin plus fosfomycin significantly improved the efficacy of daptomycin monotherapy at 6 mg/kg/day in terms of both the proportion of sterile vegetations (100% versus 72%,P= 0.046) and the decrease in the density of bacteria within the vegetations (P= 0.025). Daptomycin plus fosfomycin was as effective as daptomycin monotherapy at 10 mg/kg/day (100% versus 93%,P= 1.00) and had activity similar to that of daptomycin plus cloxacillin when daptomycin was administered at 6 mg/kg/day (100% versus 88%,P= 0.48). Daptomycin nonsusceptibility was not detected in any of the isolates recovered from vegetations. In conclusion, for the treatment of MRSA experimental endocarditis, the combination of daptomycin plus fosfomycin showed synergistic and bactericidal activity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document