scholarly journals Analysis of RuvABC and RecG Involvement in the Escherichia coli Response to the Covalent Topoisomerase-DNA Complex

2010 ◽  
Vol 192 (17) ◽  
pp. 4445-4451 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeanette H. Sutherland ◽  
Yuk-Ching Tse-Dinh
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Dna Cleavage ◽  
Topoisomerase I ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Sos Induction ◽  
Cleavage Complex ◽  
Dna Complex

ABSTRACT Topoisomerases form a covalent enzyme-DNA intermediate after initial DNA cleavage. Trapping of the cleavage complex formed by type IIA topoisomerases initiates the bactericidal action of fluoroquinolones. It should be possible also to identify novel antibacterial lead compounds that act with a similar mechanism on type IA bacterial topoisomerases. The cellular response and repair pathways for trapped topoisomerase complexes remain to be fully elucidated. The RuvAB and RecG proteins could play a role in the conversion of the initial protein-DNA complex to double-strand breaks and also in the resolution of the Holliday junction during homologous recombination. Escherichia coli strains with ruvA and recG mutations are found to have increased sensitivity to low levels of norfloxacin treatment, but the mutations had more pronounced effects on survival following the accumulation of covalent complexes formed by mutant topoisomerase I defective in DNA religation. Covalent topoisomerase I and DNA gyrase complexes are converted into double-strand breaks for SOS induction by the RecBCD pathway. SOS induction following topoisomerase I complex accumulation is significantly lower in the ruvA and recG mutants than in the wild-type background, suggesting that RuvAB and RecG may play a role in converting the initial single-strand DNA-protein cleavage complex into a double-strand break prior to repair by homologous recombination. The use of a ruvB mutant proficient in homologous recombination but not in replication fork reversal demonstrated that the replication fork reversal function of RuvAB is required for SOS induction by the covalent complex formed by topoisomerase I.

scholarly journals SOS Induction by Stabilized Topoisomerase IA Cleavage Complex Occurs via the RecBCD Pathway

2008 ◽  
Vol 190 (9) ◽  
pp. 3399-3403 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeanette H. Sutherland ◽  
Bokun Cheng ◽  
I-Fen Liu ◽  
Yuk-Ching Tse-Dinh
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Cell Death ◽  
Topoisomerase I ◽  
Single Stranded Dna ◽  
Sos Induction ◽  
Cleavage Complex

ABSTRACT Accumulation of mutant topoisomerase I cleavage complex can lead to SOS induction and cell death in Escherichia coli. The single-stranded break associated with mutant topoisomerase I cleavage complex is converted to double-stranded break, which then is processed by the RecBCD pathway, followed by association of RecA with the single-stranded DNA.

scholarly journals RecO impedes RecG-SSB binding to impair the strand annealing recombination pathway in E.coli

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuefeng Pan ◽  
Li Yang ◽  
Nan Jiang ◽  
Xifang Chen ◽  
Bo Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Recombinational Repair ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Homologous Recombinational Repair ◽  
Differential Binding

AbstractFaithful duplication of genomic DNA relies not only on the fidelity of DNA replication itself, but also on fully functional DNA repair and homologous recombination machinery. We report a molecular mechanism responsible for deciding homologous recombinational repair pathways during replication dictated by binding of RecO and RecG to SSB in E.coli. Using a RecG-yfp fusion protein, we found that RecG-yfp foci appeared only in the ΔrecG, ΔrecO and ΔrecA, ΔrecO double mutants. Surprisingly, foci were not observed in wild-type ΔrecG, or double mutants where recG and either recF or, separately recR were deleted. In addition, formation of RecG-yfp foci in the ΔrecO::kanR required wildtype ssb, as ssb-113 could not substitute. This suggests that RecG and RecO binding to SSB is competitive. We also found that the UV resistance of recO alone mutant increased to certain extent by supplementing RecG. In an ssb-113 mutant, RecO and RecG worked following a different pattern. Both RecO and RecG were able to participate in repairing UV damages when grown at permissive temperature, while they could also be involved in making DNA double strand breaks when grown at nonpermissive temperature. So, our results suggested that differential binding of RecG and RecO to SSB in a DNA replication fork in Escherichia coli.may be involved in determining whether the SDSA or DSBR pathway of homologous recombinational repair is used.Author summarySingle strand DNA binding proteins (SSB) stabilize DNA holoenzyme and prevent single strand DNA from folding into non-B DNA structures in a DNA replication fork. It has also been revealed that SSB can also act as a platform for some proteins working in DNA repair and recombination to access DNA molecules when DNA replication fork needs to be reestablished. In Escherichia coli, several proteins working primarily in DNA repair and recombination were found to participate in DNA replication fork resumption by physically interacting with SSB, including RecO and RecG etc. However the hierarchy of these proteins interacting with SSB in Escherichia coli has not been well defined. In this study, we demonstrated a differential binding of RecO and RecG to SSB in DNA replication was used to establish a RecO-dependent pathway of replication fork repair by abolishing a RecG-dependent replication fork repair. We also show that, RecG and RecO could randomly participate in DNA replication repair in the absence of a functional SSB, which may be responsible for the generation of DNA double strand breaks in an ssb-113 mutant in Escherichia coli.

scholarly journals Comparison of Responses to Double-Strand Breaks between Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis Reveals Different Requirements for SOS Induction

2008 ◽  
Vol 191 (4) ◽  
pp. 1152-1161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lyle A. Simmons ◽  
Alexi I. Goranov ◽  
Hajime Kobayashi ◽  
Bryan W. Davies ◽  
Daniel S. Yuan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Bacillus Subtilis ◽  
Ionizing Radiation ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Double Strand Break Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Sos Induction

ABSTRACT DNA double-strand breaks are particularly deleterious lesions that can lead to genomic instability and cell death. We investigated the SOS response to double-strand breaks in both Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis. In E. coli, double-strand breaks induced by ionizing radiation resulted in SOS induction in virtually every cell. E. coli strains incapable of SOS induction were sensitive to ionizing radiation. In striking contrast, we found that in B. subtilis both ionizing radiation and a site-specific double-strand break causes induction of prophage PBSX and SOS gene expression in only a small subpopulation of cells. These results show that double-strand breaks provoke global SOS induction in E. coli but not in B. subtilis. Remarkably, RecA-GFP focus formation was nearly identical following ionizing radiation challenge in both E. coli and B. subtilis, demonstrating that formation of RecA-GFP foci occurs in response to double-strand breaks but does not require or result in SOS induction in B. subtilis. Furthermore, we found that B. subtilis cells incapable of inducing SOS had near wild-type levels of survival in response to ionizing radiation. Moreover, B. subtilis RecN contributes to maintaining low levels of SOS induction during double-strand break repair. Thus, we found that the contribution of SOS induction to double-strand break repair differs substantially between E. coli and B. subtilis.

scholarly journals One end to rule them all: Non-homologous end-joining and homologous recombination at DNA double-strand breaks

2020 ◽  
Vol 93 (1115) ◽  
pp. 20191054 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Ensminger ◽  
Markus Löbrich
Keyword(s):  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Cycle Phase ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining ◽  
Dna Double Helix

Double-strand breaks (DSBs) represent the most severe type of DNA damage since they can lead to genomic rearrangements, events that can initiate and promote tumorigenic processes. DSBs arise from various exogenous agents that induce two single-strand breaks at opposite locations in the DNA double helix. Such two-ended DSBs are repaired in mammalian cells by one of two conceptually different processes, non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination (HR). NHEJ has the potential to form rearrangements while HR is believed to be error-free since it uses a homologous template for repair. DSBs can also arise from single-stranded DNA lesions if they lead to replication fork collapse. Such DSBs, however, have only one end and are repaired by HR and not by NHEJ. In fact, the majority of spontaneously arising DSBs are one-ended and HR has likely evolved to repair one-ended DSBs. HR of such DSBs demands the engagement of a second break end that is generated by an approaching replication fork. This HR process can cause rearrangements if a homologous template other than the sister chromatid is used. Thus, both NHEJ and HR have the potential to form rearrangements and the proper choice between them is governed by various factors, including cell cycle phase and genomic location of the lesion. We propose that the specific requirements for repairing one-ended DSBs have shaped HR in a way which makes NHEJ the better choice for the repair of some but not all two-ended DSBs.

scholarly journals Palindromes as Substrates for Multiple Pathways of Recombination in Escherichia coli

Genetics ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 154 (2) ◽  
pp. 513-522 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gareth A Cromie ◽  
Catherine B Millar ◽  
Kristina H Schmidt ◽  
David R F Leach
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Secondary Structures ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Recq Helicase ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Imperfect Palindrome ◽  
Dependent Pathway

Abstract A 246-bp imperfect palindrome has the potential to form hairpin structures in single-stranded DNA during replication. Genetic evidence suggests that these structures are converted to double-strand breaks by the SbcCD nuclease and that the double-strand breaks are repaired by recombination. We investigated the role of a range of recombination mutations on the viability of cells containing this palindrome. The palindrome was introduced into the Escherichia coli chromosome by phage λ lysogenization. This was done in both wt and sbcC backgrounds. Repair of the SbcCD-induced double-strand breaks requires a large number of proteins, including the components of both the RecB and RecF pathways. Repair does not involve PriA-dependent replication fork restart, which suggests that the double-strand break occurs after the replication fork has passed the palindrome. In the absence of SbcCD, recombination still occurs, probably using a gap substrate. This process is also PriA independent, suggesting that there is no collapse of the replication fork. In the absence of RecA, the RecQ helicase is required for palindrome viability in a sbcC mutant, suggesting that a helicase-dependent pathway exists to allow replicative bypass of secondary structures.

scholarly journals Repair System for Noncanonical Purines in Escherichia coli

2003 ◽  
Vol 185 (10) ◽  
pp. 3101-3110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas E. Burgis ◽  
Jason J. Brucker ◽  
Richard P. Cunningham
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Repair System ◽  
Purine Base ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Endonuclease V ◽  
Sos Induction ◽  
Deoxynucleotide Triphosphate

ABSTRACT Exposure of Escherichia coli strains deficient in molybdopterin biosynthesis (moa) to the purine base N-6-hydroxylaminopurine (HAP) is mutagenic and toxic. We show that moa mutants exposed to HAP also exhibit elevated mutagenesis, a hyperrecombination phenotype, and increased SOS induction. The E. coli rdgB gene encodes a protein homologous to a deoxyribonucleotide triphosphate pyrophosphatase from Methanococcus jannaschii that shows a preference for purine base analogs. moa rdgB mutants are extremely sensitive to killing by HAP and exhibit increased mutagenesis, recombination, and SOS induction upon HAP exposure. Disruption of the endonuclease V gene, nfi, rescues the HAP sensitivity displayed by moa and moa rdgB mutants and reduces the level of recombination and SOS induction, but it increases the level of mutagenesis. Our results suggest that endonuclease V incision of DNA containing HAP leads to increased recombination and SOS induction and even cell death. Double-strand break repair mutants display an increase in HAP sensitivity, which can be reversed by an nfi mutation. This suggests that cell killing may result from an increase in double-strand breaks generated when replication forks encounter endonuclease V-nicked DNA. We propose a pathway for the removal of HAP from purine pools, from deoxynucleotide triphosphate pools, and from DNA, and we suggest a general model for excluding purine base analogs from DNA. The system for HAP removal consists of a molybdoenzyme, thought to detoxify HAP, a deoxyribonucleotide triphosphate pyrophosphatase that removes noncanonical deoxyribonucleotide triphosphates from replication precursor pools, and an endonuclease that initiates the removal of HAP from DNA.

scholarly journals Hydroxyl Radicals Are Involved in Cell Killing by the Bacterial Topoisomerase I Cleavage Complex

2009 ◽  
Vol 191 (16) ◽  
pp. 5315-5319 ◽  
Author(s):  
I-Fen Liu ◽  
Thirunavukkarasu Annamalai ◽  
Jeanette H. Sutherland ◽  
Yuk-Ching Tse-Dinh
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Oxidative Damage ◽  
Hydroxyl Radicals ◽  
Topoisomerase I ◽  
Cluster Formation ◽  
Cell Killing ◽  
Cleavage Complex ◽  
Dna Complex

ABSTRACT Escherichia coli expressing SOS-inducing mutant topoisomerase I was utilized to demonstrate that covalent protein-DNA complex accumulation results in oxidative damage. Hydroxyl radicals were detected following mutant topoisomerase induction. The presence of the Fe2+ chelator 2,2′-dipyridyl and an iscS mutation affecting Fe-S cluster formation protect against topoisomerase I cleavage complex-mediated cell killing.

scholarly journals Mus81-mediated DNA cleavage resolves replication forks stalled by topoisomerase I–DNA complexes

2011 ◽  
Vol 195 (5) ◽  
pp. 739-749 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie Regairaz ◽  
Yong-Wei Zhang ◽  
Haiqing Fu ◽  
Keli K. Agama ◽  
Nalini Tata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Cleavage ◽  
Topoisomerase I ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Replication Fork Progression ◽  
Efficient Replication ◽  
Spontaneous Reversal ◽  
Dna Combing

Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) topoisomerases are essential for removing the supercoiling that normally builds up ahead of replication forks. The camptothecin (CPT) Top1 (topoisomerase I) inhibitors exert their anticancer activity by reversibly trapping Top1–DNA cleavage complexes (Top1cc’s) and inducing replication-associated DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). In this paper, we propose a new mechanism by which cells avoid Top1-induced replication-dependent DNA damage. We show that the structure-specific endonuclease Mus81-Eme1 is responsible for generating DSBs in response to Top1 inhibition and for allowing cell survival. We provide evidence that Mus81 cleaves replication forks rather than excises Top1cc’s. DNA combing demonstrated that Mus81 also allows efficient replication fork progression after CPT treatment. We propose that Mus81 cleaves stalled replication forks, which allows dissipation of the excessive supercoiling resulting from Top1 inhibition, spontaneous reversal of Top1cc, and replication fork progression.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document