Genome copy number regulates inclusion expansion, septation, and infectious developmental form conversion in Chlamydia trachomatis

DNA replication is essential for the growth and development of Chlamydia trachomatis, however it is unclear how this process contributes to and is controlled by the pathogen’s biphasic lifecycle. While inhibitors of transcription, translation, cell division, and glucose-6-phosphate transport all negatively affect chlamydial intracellular development, the effects of directly inhibiting DNA polymerase have never been examined. We isolated a temperature sensitive dnaE mutant (dnaEts) that exhibits a ∼100-fold reduction in genome copy number at the non-permissive temperature (40°C), but replicates similarly to the parent at the permissive temperature of 37°C. We measured higher ratios of genomic DNA nearer the origin of replication than the terminus in dnaEts at 40°C, indicating that this replication deficiency is due to a defect in DNA polymerase processivity. dnaEts formed fewer and smaller pathogenic vacuoles (inclusions) at 40°C, and the bacteria appeared enlarged and exhibited defects in cell division. The bacteria also lacked both discernable peptidoglycan and polymerized MreB, the major cell division organizing protein in Chlamydia responsible for nascent peptidoglycan biosynthesis. We also found that absolute genome copy number, rather than active genome replication, was sufficient for infectious progeny production. Deficiencies in both genome replication and inclusion expansion reversed when dnaEts was shifted from 40°C to 37°C early in infection, and intragenic suppressor mutations in dnaE also restored dnaEts genome replication and inclusion expansion at 40°C. Overall, our results show that genome replication in C. trachomatis is required for inclusion expansion, septum formation, and the transition between the microbe’s replicative and infectious forms. SIGNIFICANCE Chlamydiae transition between infectious, extracellular elementary bodies (EBs) and non-infectious, intracellular reticulate bodies (RBs). Some checkpoints that govern transitions in chlamydial development have been identified, but the extent to which genome replication plays a role in regulating the pathogen's infectious cycle has not been characterized. We show that genome replication is dispensable for EB to RB conversion, but is necessary for RB proliferation, division septum formation, and inclusion expansion. We use new methods to investigate developmental checkpoints and dependencies in Chlamydia that facilitate the ordering of events in the microbe's biphasic life cycle. Our findings suggest that Chlamydia utilizes feedback inhibition to regulate core metabolic processes during development, likely an adaptation to intracellular stress and a nutrient-limiting environment.

Download Full-text

Plant Organelle Genome Replication

Plants ◽

10.3390/plants8100358 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 8 (10) ◽

pp. 358 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Stewart A. Morley ◽

Niaz Ahmad ◽

Brent L. Nielsen

Keyword(s):

Copy Number ◽

Plant Mitochondria ◽

Plant Tissues ◽

Genome Replication ◽

Genome Copy ◽

Atp Production ◽

Organelle Dna ◽

Organellar Dna ◽

Multiple Processes ◽

Genome Copy Number

Mitochondria and chloroplasts perform essential functions in respiration, ATP production, and photosynthesis, and both organelles contain genomes that encode only some of the proteins that are required for these functions. The proteins and mechanisms for organelle DNA replication are very similar to bacterial or phage systems. The minimal replisome may consist of DNA polymerase, a primase/helicase, and a single-stranded DNA binding protein (SSB), similar to that found in bacteriophage T7. In Arabidopsis, there are two genes for organellar DNA polymerases and multiple potential genes for SSB, but there is only one known primase/helicase protein to date. Genome copy number varies widely between type and age of plant tissues. Replication mechanisms are only poorly understood at present, and may involve multiple processes, including recombination-dependent replication (RDR) in plant mitochondria and perhaps also in chloroplasts. There are still important questions remaining as to how the genomes are maintained in new organelles, and how genome copy number is determined. This review summarizes our current understanding of these processes.

Download Full-text

Nuclear-cytoplasmic balance: whole genome duplications induce elevated organellar genome copy number

10.1101/2021.06.08.447629 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Matheus Fernandes Gyorfy ◽

Emma R Miller ◽

Justin L Conover ◽

Corrinne E Grover ◽

Jonathan F Wendel ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Copy Number ◽

Nuclear Genome ◽

Plant Genome ◽

Whole Genome ◽

Genome Copy ◽

Relative Copy Number ◽

Organellar Genome ◽

Plastid Genomes ◽

Copy Numbers ◽

Genome Copy Number

The plant genome is partitioned across three distinct subcellular compartments: the nucleus, mitochondria, and plastids. Successful coordination of gene expression among these organellar genomes and the nuclear genome is critical for plant function and fitness. Whole genome duplication events (WGDs) in the nucleus have played a major role in the diversification of land plants and are expected to perturb the relative copy number (stoichiometry) of nuclear, mitochondrial, and plastid genomes. Thus, elucidating the mechanisms whereby plant cells respond to the cytonuclear stoichiometric imbalance that follow WGDs represents an important yet underexplored question in understanding the evolutionary consequences of genome doubling. We used droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) to investigate the relationship between nuclear and organellar genome copy numbers in allopolyploids and their diploid progenitors in both wheat and Arabidopsis. Polyploids exhibit elevated organellar genome copy numbers per cell, largely preserving the cytonuclear stoichiometry observed in diploids despite the change in nuclear genome copy number. To investigate the timescale over which cytonuclear stoichiometry may respond to WGD, we also estimated organellar genome copy number in Arabidopsis synthetic autopolyploids and in a haploid-induced diploid line. We observed corresponding changes in organellar genome copy number in these laboratory-generated lines, indicating that at least some of the cellular response to cytonuclear stoichiometric imbalance is immediate following WGD. We conclude that increases in organellar genome copy numbers represent a common response to polyploidization, suggesting that maintenance of cytonuclear stoichiometry is an important component in establishing polyploid lineages.

Download Full-text