scholarly journals Promoter Selectivity of the Bradyrhizobium japonicum RpoH Transcription Factors In Vivo and In Vitro

1998 ◽  
Vol 180 (9) ◽  
pp. 2395-2401 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franz Narberhaus ◽  
Michael Kowarik ◽  
Christoph Beck ◽  
Hauke Hennecke
Keyword(s):  
Heat Shock ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Bradyrhizobium Japonicum ◽  
Normal Growth ◽  
Growth Conditions ◽  
Start Site ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Soluble C

ABSTRACT Expression of the dnaKJ andgroESL 1 heat shock operons ofBradyrhizobium japonicum depends on a ς32-like transcription factor. Three such factors (RpoH1, RpoH2, and RpoH3) have previously been identified in this organism. We report here that they direct transcription from some but not all ς32-type promoters when the respective rpoH genes are expressed inEscherichia coli. All three RpoH factors were purified as soluble C-terminally histidine-tagged proteins, although the bulk of overproduced RpoH3 was insoluble. The purified proteins were recognized by an anti-E. coli ς32 serum. While RpoH1 and RpoH2 productively interacted with E. coli core RNA polymerase and produced E. coli groE transcript in vitro, RpoH3 was unable to do so.B. japonicum core RNA polymerase was prepared and reconstituted with the RpoH proteins. Again, RpoH1 and RpoH2 were active, and they initiated transcription at theB. japonicum groESL 1 and dnaKJpromoters. In all cases, the in vitro start site was shown to be identical to the start site determined in vivo. Promoter competition experiments revealed that the B. japonicum dnaKJ andgroESL 1 promoters were suboptimal for transcription by RpoH1- or RpoH2-containing RNA polymerase from B. japonicum. In a mixture of different templates, the E. coli groESL promoter was preferred over any other promoter. Differences were observed in the specificities of both sigma factors toward B. japonicum rpoH-dependent promoters. We conclude that the primary function of RpoH2is to supply the cell with DnaKJ under normal growth conditions whereas RpoH1 is responsible mainly for increasing the level of GroESL1 after a heat shock.

scholarly journals Transcription of the Rhodobacter sphaeroides cycA P1 Promoter by Alternate RNA Polymerase Holoenzymes

1998 ◽  
Vol 180 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara J. MacGregor ◽  
Russell K. Karls ◽  
Timothy J. Donohue
Keyword(s):  
Heat Shock ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rhodobacter Sphaeroides ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Consensus Sequence ◽  
Initiation Site ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Rna Polymerase Holoenzyme

ABSTRACT These experiments sought to identify what form of RNA polymerase transcribes the P1 promoter for the Rhodobacter sphaeroidescytochrome c 2 gene (cycA). In vitro, cycA P1 was recognized by an RNA polymerase holoenzyme fraction that transcribes several well-characterizedEscherichia coli heat shock (ς32) promoters. The in vivo effects of mutations flanking the transcription initiation site (+1) also suggested that cycA P1 was recognized by an RNA polymerase similar to E. coli Eς32. Function of cycA P1 was not altered by mutations more than 35 bp upstream of position +1 or by alterations downstream of −7. A point mutation at position −34 that is towards the E. coliEς32 −35 consensus sequence (G34T) increasedcycA P1 activity ∼20-fold, while several mutations that reduced or abolished promoter function changed highly conserved bases in presumed −10 or −35 elements. In addition, cycA P1 function was retained in mutant promoters with a spacer region as short as 14 nucleotides. When either wild-type or G34T promoters were incubated with reconstituted RNA polymerase holoenzymes,cycA P1 transcription was observed only with samples containing either a 37-kDa subunit that is a member of the heat shock sigma factor family (Eς37) or a 38-kDa subunit that also allows core RNA polymerase to recognize E. coli heat shock promoters (Eς38) (R. K. Karls, J. Brooks, P. Rossmeissl, J. Luedke, and T. J. Donohue, J. Bacteriol. 180:10–19, 1998).

scholarly journals Escherichia coli RNA Polymerase Recognition of a σ70-Dependent Promoter Requiring a −35 DNA Element and an Extended −10 TGn Motif

2006 ◽  
Vol 188 (24) ◽  
pp. 8352-8359 ◽  
Author(s):  
India Hook-Barnard ◽  
Xanthia B. Johnson ◽  
Deborah M. Hinton
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Consensus Sequence ◽  
Perfect Match ◽  
Start Site ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Functional Differences ◽  
Extension Analysis

ABSTRACT Escherichia coli σ70-dependent promoters have typically been characterized as either −10/−35 promoters, which have good matches to both the canonical −10 and the −35 sequences or as extended −10 promoters (TGn/−10 promoters), which have the TGn motif and an excellent match to the −10 consensus sequence. We report here an investigation of a promoter, Pminor, that has a nearly perfect match to the −35 sequence and has the TGn motif. However, Pminor contains an extremely poor σ70 −10 element. We demonstrate that Pminor is active both in vivo and in vitro and that mutations in either the −35 or the TGn motif eliminate its activity. Mutation of the TGn motif can be compensated for by mutations that make the −10 element more canonical, thus converting the −35/TGn promoter to a −35/−10 promoter. Potassium permanganate footprinting on the nontemplate and template strands indicates that when polymerase is in a stable (open) complex with Pminor, the DNA is single stranded from positions −11 to +4. We also demonstrate that transcription from Pminor incorporates nontemplated ribonucleoside triphosphates at the 5′ end of the Pminor transcript, which results in an anomalous assignment for the start site when primer extension analysis is used. Pminor represents one of the few −35/TGn promoters that have been characterized and serves as a model for investigating functional differences between these promoters and the better-characterized −10/−35 and extended −10 promoters used by E. coli RNA polymerase.

scholarly journals Interactions between RNA polymerase and the core recognition element are a determinant of transcription start site selection

2016 ◽  
Vol 113 (21) ◽  
pp. E2899-E2905 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irina O. Vvedenskaya ◽  
Hanif Vahedian-Movahed ◽  
Yuanchao Zhang ◽  
Deanne M. Taylor ◽  
Richard H. Ebright ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Transcription Start Site ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Specific Protein ◽  
Start Site ◽  
Transcription Start ◽  
Transcription Bubble ◽  
Recognition Element

During transcription initiation, RNA polymerase (RNAP) holoenzyme unwinds ∼13 bp of promoter DNA, forming an RNAP-promoter open complex (RPo) containing a single-stranded transcription bubble, and selects a template-strand nucleotide to serve as the transcription start site (TSS). In RPo, RNAP core enzyme makes sequence-specific protein–DNA interactions with the downstream part of the nontemplate strand of the transcription bubble (“core recognition element,” CRE). Here, we investigated whether sequence-specific RNAP–CRE interactions affect TSS selection. To do this, we used two next-generation sequencing-based approaches to compare the TSS profile of WT RNAP to that of an RNAP derivative defective in sequence-specific RNAP–CRE interactions. First, using massively systematic transcript end readout, MASTER, we assessed effects of RNAP–CRE interactions on TSS selection in vitro and in vivo for a library of 47 (∼16,000) consensus promoters containing different TSS region sequences, and we observed that the TSS profile of the RNAP derivative defective in RNAP–CRE interactions differed from that of WT RNAP, in a manner that correlated with the presence of consensus CRE sequences in the TSS region. Second, using 5′ merodiploid native-elongating-transcript sequencing, 5′ mNET-seq, we assessed effects of RNAP–CRE interactions at natural promoters in Escherichia coli, and we identified 39 promoters at which RNAP–CRE interactions determine TSS selection. Our findings establish RNAP–CRE interactions are a functional determinant of TSS selection. We propose that RNAP–CRE interactions modulate the position of the downstream end of the transcription bubble in RPo, and thereby modulate TSS selection, which involves transcription bubble expansion or transcription bubble contraction (scrunching or antiscrunching).

scholarly journals The Escherichia coli cysG promoter belongs to the ‘extended −10’ class of bacterial promoters

1993 ◽  
Vol 296 (3) ◽  
pp. 851-857 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Belyaeva ◽  
L Griffiths ◽  
S Minchin ◽  
J Cole ◽  
S Busby
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Point Mutations ◽  
Growth Conditions ◽  
Upstream Region ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Run Off ◽  
A Site ◽  
Specific Sequences

The Escherichia coli cysG promoter has been subcloned and shown to function constitutively in a range of different growth conditions. Point mutations identify the -10 hexamer and an important 5′-TGN-3′ motif immediately upstream. The effects of different deletions suggest that specific sequences in the -35 region are not essential for the activity of this promoter in vivo. This conclusion was confirmed by in vitro run-off transcription assays. The DNAase I footprint of RNA polymerase at the cysG promoter reveals extended protection upstream of the transcript start, and studies with potassium permanganate as a probe suggest that the upstream region is distorted in open complexes. Taken together, the results show that the cysG promoter belongs to the ‘extended -10’ class of promoters, and the base sequence is similar to that of the P1 promoter of the E. coli galactose operon, another promoter in this class. In vivo, messenger initiated at the cysG promoter appears to be processed by cleavage at a site 41 bases downstream from the transcript start point.

scholarly journals The Skn7 Response Regulator ofSaccharomyces cerevisiaeInteracts with Hsf1 In Vivo and Is Required for the Induction of Heat Shock Genes by Oxidative Stress

2000 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 2335-2347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Desmond C. Raitt ◽  
Anthony L. Johnson ◽  
Alexander M. Erkine ◽  
Kozo Makino ◽  
Brian Morgan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oxidative Stress ◽  
Heat Shock ◽  
Response Regulator ◽  
Coiled Coil ◽  
Normal Growth ◽  
Temperature Sensitive ◽  
Regulatory Sequences ◽  
Heat Shock Genes

The Skn7 response regulator has previously been shown to play a role in the induction of stress-responsive genes in yeast, e.g., in the induction of the thioredoxin gene in response to hydrogen peroxide. The yeast Heat Shock Factor, Hsf1, is central to the induction of another set of stress-inducible genes, namely the heat shock genes. These two regulatory trans-activators, Hsf1 and Skn7, share certain structural homologies, particularly in their DNA-binding domains and the presence of adjacent regions of coiled-coil structure, which are known to mediate protein–protein interactions. Here, we provide evidence that Hsf1 and Skn7 interact in vitro and in vivo and we show that Skn7 can bind to the same regulatory sequences as Hsf1, namely heat shock elements. Furthermore, we demonstrate that a strain deleted for the SKN7 gene and containing a temperature-sensitive mutation in Hsf1 is hypersensitive to oxidative stress. Our data suggest that Skn7 and Hsf1 cooperate to achieve maximal induction of heat shock genes in response specifically to oxidative stress. We further show that, like Hsf1, Skn7 can interact with itself and is localized to the nucleus under normal growth conditions as well as during oxidative stress.

scholarly journals Substitution of a Highly Conserved Histidine in the Escherichia coli Heat Shock Transcription Factor, σ32, Affects Promoter Utilization In Vitro and Leads to Overexpression of the Biofilm-Associated Flu Protein In Vivo

2007 ◽  
Vol 189 (23) ◽  
pp. 8430-8436 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olga V. Kourennaia ◽  
Pieter L. deHaseth
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Heat Shock ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Sigma Factor ◽  
Stable Complex ◽  
Tryptophan Residue ◽  
Specific Sequence ◽  
Bacterial Rna

ABSTRACT The heat shock sigma factor (σ32 in Escherichia coli) directs the bacterial RNA polymerase to promoters of a specific sequence to form a stable complex, competent to initiate transcription of genes whose products mitigate the effects of exposure of the cell to high temperatures. The histidine at position 107 of σ32 is at the homologous position of a tryptophan residue at position 433 of the main sigma factor of E. coli, σ70. This tryptophan is essential for the strand separation step leading to the formation of the initiation-competent RNA polymerase-promoter complex. The heat shock sigma factors of all gammaproteobacteria sequenced have a histidine at this position, while in the alpha- and deltaproteobacteria, it is a tryptophan. In vitro the alanine-for-histidine substitution at position 107 (H107A) destabilizes complexes between the GroE promoter and RNA polymerase containing σ32, implying that H107 plays a role in formation or maintenance of the strand-separated complex. In vivo, the H107A substitution in σ32 impedes recovery from heat shock (exposure to 42°C), and it also leads to overexpression at lower temperatures (30°C) of the Flu protein, which is associated with biofilm formation.

scholarly journals Substitutions in Bacteriophage T4 AsiA andEscherichia coli ς70 That Suppress T4motA Activation Mutations

2001 ◽  
Vol 183 (7) ◽  
pp. 2289-2297 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco P. Cicero ◽  
Meghan M. Sharp ◽  
Carol A. Gross ◽  
Kenneth N. Kreuzer
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Burst Size ◽  
Bacteriophage T4 ◽  
In Vitro Transcription ◽  
Positive Control ◽  
Plaque Morphology ◽  
Mutant Proteins ◽  
E Coli

ABSTRACT Bacteriophage T4 middle-mode transcription requires two phage-encoded proteins, the MotA transcription factor and AsiA coactivator, along with Escherichia coli RNA polymerase holoenzyme containing the ς70 subunit. AmotA positive control (pc) mutant, motA-pc1, was used to select for suppressor mutations that alter other proteins in the transcription complex. Separate genetic selections isolated two AsiA mutants (S22F and Q51E) and five ς70 mutants (Y571C, Y571H, D570N, L595P, and S604P). All seven suppressor mutants gave partial suppressor phenotypes in vivo as judged by plaque morphology and burst size measurements. The S22F mutant AsiA protein and glutathione S-transferase fusions of the five mutant ς70 proteins were purified. All of these mutant proteins allowed normal levels of in vitro transcription when tested with wild-type MotA protein, but they failed to suppress the mutant MotA-pc1 protein in the same assay. The ς70 substitutions affected the 4.2 region, which binds the −35 sequence of E. coli promoters. In the presence of E. coli RNA polymerase without T4 proteins, the L595P and S604P substitutions greatly decreased transcription from standard E. colipromoters. This defect could not be explained solely by a disruption in −35 recognition since similar results were obtained with extended −10 promoters. The generalized transcriptional defect of these two mutants correlated with a defect in binding to core RNA polymerase, as judged by immunoprecipitation analysis. The L595P mutant, which was the most defective for in vitro transcription, failed to support E. coli growth.

scholarly journals Nascent RNA sequencing identifies a widespread sigma70-dependent pausing regulated by Gre factors in bacteria

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhe Sun ◽  
Alexander Yakhnin ◽  
Peter C. FitzGerald ◽  
Carl E. Mclntosh ◽  
Mikhail Kashlev
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Transcription Start Site ◽  
Environmental Cues ◽  
Start Site ◽  
Transcription Start ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Eukaryotic Genes ◽  
Genome Wide ◽  
Transcript Cleavage

ABSTRACTPromoter-proximal pausing regulates expression of many eukaryotic genes and serves as checkpoints for assembly of elongation/splicing machinery. Little is known how broadly the pausing is employed in transcriptional regulation in bacteria. We applied NET-seq combined with RNase I footprinting for genome-wide analysis of σ70-dependent transcription pauses in Escherichia coli. Many E. coli genes appear to contain clusters of strong backtracked pauses at 10-20-bp distance from the transcription start site caused by retention of σ70 subunit in RNA polymerase. The pauses in 10-15-bp register of the promoter are dictated by binding of σ70 to canonical −10 element, 6-7 nt spacer and “YR+1Y” motif centered at transcription start site all characteristic for strong E. coli promoters. The promoters for the pauses in 16-20-bp register contain an additional −10-like sequence positioned on the same face of the DNA duplex as the original −10 element suggesting that σ70 hopping was responsible for these pauses. Our in vitro analysis reveals that RNA polymerase backtracking and DNA scrunching are involved in these pauses that are relieved by Gre transcript cleavage factors. The genes coding for transcription factors are enriched in these pauses suggesting that σ70 and Gre proteins regulate transcription in response to changing environmental cues.

scholarly journals Multiple layers of control govern expression of the Escherichia coli ibpAB heat-shock operon

Microbiology ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 157 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lena C. Gaubig ◽  
Torsten Waldminghaus ◽  
Franz Narberhaus
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Heat Shock ◽  
Transcriptional Control ◽  
Rnase E ◽  
Translation Control ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Complex Process ◽  
Shock Proteins

The Escherichia coli ibpAB operon encodes two small heat-shock proteins, the inclusion-body-binding proteins IbpA and IbpB. Here, we report that expression of ibpAB is a complex process involving at least four different layers of control, namely transcriptional control, RNA processing, translation control and protein stability. As a typical member of the heat-shock regulon, transcription of the ibpAB operon is controlled by the alternative sigma factor σ 32 (RpoH). Heat-induced transcription of the bicistronic operon is followed by RNase E-mediated processing events, resulting in monocistronic ibpA and ibpB transcripts and short 3′-terminal ibpB fragments. Translation of ibpA is controlled by an RNA thermometer in its 5′ untranslated region, forming a secondary structure that blocks entry of the ribosome at low temperatures. A similar structure upstream of ibpB is functional in vitro but not in vivo, suggesting downregulation of ibpB expression in the presence of IbpA. The recently reported degradation of IbpA and IbpB by the Lon protease and differential regulation of IbpA and IbpB levels in E. coli are discussed.

scholarly journals Plasticity of the Pjunc Promoter of ISEc11, a New Insertion Sequence of the IS1111 Family

2006 ◽  
Vol 188 (13) ◽  
pp. 4681-4689 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gianni Prosseda ◽  
Maria Carmela Latella ◽  
Mariassunta Casalino ◽  
Mauro Nicoletti ◽  
Stefano Michienzi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Insertion Sequence ◽  
Functional Characterization ◽  
Virulence Plasmid ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Starting Point ◽  
Natural Variant ◽  
The Right

ABSTRACT We describe identification and functional characterization of ISEc11, a new insertion sequence that is widespread in enteroinvasive E. coli (EIEC), in which it is always present on the virulence plasmid (pINV) and very frequently also present on the chromosome. ISEc11 is flanked by subterminal 13-bp inverted repeats (IRs) and is bounded by 3-bp terminal sequences, and it transposes with target specificity without generating duplication of the target site. ISEc11 is characterized by an atypical transposase containing the DEDD motif of the Piv/MooV family of DNA recombinases, and it is closely related to the IS1111 family. Transposition occurs by formation of minicircles through joining of the abutted ends and results in assembly of a junction promoter (PjuncC) containing a −10 box in the interstitial sequence and a −35 box upstream of the right IR. A natural variant of ISEc11 (ISEc11p), found on EIEC pINV plasmids, contains a perfect duplication of the outermost 39 bp of the right end. Upon circularization, ISEc11p forms a junction promoter (PjuncP) which, despite carrying −10 and −35 boxes identical to those of PjuncC, exhibits 30-fold-greater strength in vivo. The discovery of only one starting point in primer extension experiments rules out the possibility that there are alternative promoter sites within the 39-bp duplication. Analysis of in vitro-generated transcripts confirmed that at limiting RNA polymerase concentrations, the activity of PjuncP is 20-fold higher than the activity of PjuncC. These observations suggest that the 39-bp duplication might host cis-acting elements that facilitate the binding of RNA polymerase to the promoter.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document