scholarly journals Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing ofBilophila wadsworthia Isolates Submitted for Routine Laboratory Examination

1998 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 1790-1792 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chikako Mochida ◽  
Yoichi Hirakata ◽  
Junichi Matsuda ◽  
Fumiaki Iori ◽  
Yumi Ozaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility ◽  
Pyruvic Acid ◽  
Measurement Method ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Inoculum Size ◽  
Routine Laboratory ◽  
Broth Microdilution ◽  
Laboratory Examination ◽  
Routine Laboratory Examination ◽  
Agar Dilution

MICs of antibiotics against Bilophila wadsworthiaisolates were measured by agar and broth microdilution with pyruvic acid and by Etest. The inoculum size influenced greatly agar dilution. Despite discrepancies in MICs depending on the measurement method used, clindamycin consistently showed potent activity. Broth microdilution and Etest appear to be candidates for laboratory susceptibility testing.

scholarly journals Broth Microdilution and Gradient Diffusion Strips vs. Reference Agar Dilution Method: First Evaluation for Clostridiales Species Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

Antibiotics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 975
Author(s):  
Florian Baquer ◽  
Asma Ali Sawan ◽  
Michel Auzou ◽  
Antoine Grillon ◽  
Benoît Jaulhac ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Reference Method ◽  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Dilution Method ◽  
Agar Dilution Method ◽  
Broth Microdilution ◽  
Multicenter Studies ◽  
Gradient Diffusion ◽  
Agar Dilution

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of anaerobes is challenging. Because MIC determination is recommended by both CLSI and EUCAST, commercial broth microdilution and diffusion strip tests have been developed. The reliability of broth microdilution methods has not been assessed yet using the agar dilution reference method. In this work, we evaluated two broth microdilution kits (MICRONAUT-S Anaerobes® MIC and Sensititre Anaerobe MIC®) and one gradient diffusion strip method (Liofilchem®) for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of 47 Clostridiales isolates (Clostridium, Clostridioides and Hungatella species) using the agar dilution method as a reference. The evaluation focused on comparing six antimicrobial molecules available in both microdilution kits. Analytical performances were evaluated according to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommendations. Essential agreements (EA) and categorical agreements (CA) varied greatly according to the molecule and the evaluated method. Vancomycin had values of essential and categorical agreements above 90% for the three methods. The CA fulfilled the FDA criteria for three major molecules in the treatment of Gram-positive anaerobic infections (metronidazole, piperacillin/tazobactam and vancomycin). The highest rate of error was observed for clindamycin. Multicenter studies are needed to further validate these results.

scholarly journals Comparison of Agar Dilution, Disk Diffusion, MicroScan, and Vitek Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Methods to Broth Microdilution for Detection of Fluoroquinolone-Resistant Isolates of the FamilyEnterobacteriaceae

1999 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 544-547 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine D. Steward ◽  
Sheila A. Stocker ◽  
Jana M. Swenson ◽  
Caroline M. O’Hara ◽  
Jonathan R. Edwards ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Error Rates ◽  
Disk Diffusion ◽  
Fluoroquinolone Resistance ◽  
Broth Microdilution ◽  
Major Error ◽  
Testing Methods ◽  
Minor Error ◽  
Agar Dilution

Fluoroquinolone resistance appears to be increasing in many species of bacteria, particularly in those causing nosocomial infections. However, the accuracy of some antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods for detecting fluoroquinolone resistance remains uncertain. Therefore, we compared the accuracy of the results of agar dilution, disk diffusion, MicroScan Walk Away Neg Combo 15 conventional panels, and Vitek GNS-F7 cards to the accuracy of the results of the broth microdilution reference method for detection of ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin resistance in 195 clinical isolates of the familyEnterobacteriaceae collected from six U.S. hospitals for a national surveillance project (Project ICARE [Intensive Care Antimicrobial Resistance Epidemiology]). For ciprofloxacin, very major error rates were 0% (disk diffusion and MicroScan), 0.9% (agar dilution), and 2.7% (Vitek), while major error rates ranged from 0% (agar dilution) to 3.7% (MicroScan and Vitek). Minor error rates ranged from 12.3% (agar dilution) to 20.5% (MicroScan). For ofloxacin, no very major errors were observed, and major errors were noted only with MicroScan (3.7% major error rate). Minor error rates ranged from 8.2% (agar dilution) to 18.5% (Vitek). Minor errors for all methods were substantially reduced when results with MICs within ±1 dilution of the broth microdilution reference MIC were excluded from analysis. However, the high number of minor errors by all test systems remains a concern.

scholarly journals Detection of Colistin Resistance in Carbapenem Resistant Enterobacteriaceae by Reference Broth Microdilution and Comparative Evaluation of Three Other Methods

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Punyatoya Kar ◽  
Bijayini Behera ◽  
Srujana Mohanty ◽  
Jayanti Jena ◽  
Ashoka Mahapatra
Keyword(s):  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Good Alternative ◽  
Broth Microdilution ◽  
Major Error ◽  
Colistin Resistance ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
Agar Dilution ◽  
Moderate Sensitivity ◽  
Phenotypic Methods ◽  
User Friendly

Abstract Objective Challenges in susceptibility testing of colistin along with increase in the prevalence of colistin-resistant carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) pathogens needs addressal. Evaluation of user-friendly methods is necessary as an alternative to broth microdilution (BMD), the reference susceptibility testing method, for routine implementation in diagnostic clinical microbiology laboratories. Genotypic detection of the plasmid-mediated colistin resistance is also needed for infection control purposes. Materials and Methods Colistin susceptibility of 200 nonduplicate clinical CRE isolates from December 2017 to June 2019 was determined by BMD, agar dilution (AD), E test, and rapid polymyxin NP test and interpreted as per the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. The results of AD, E test, and NP test were compared with that of BMD, considering minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) ≤ 2 µg/mL as susceptible and > 2 µg/mL as resistant. Presence of any plasmid-mediated colistin resistance (mcr-1 and 2) was evaluated in 27 colistin-resistant CRE isolates by polymerase chain reaction. Statistical Analysis Performance of different phenotypic methods was analyzed by comparing MIC results of AD and E test with that of reference BMD method. Agreement between BMD and the other two methods was expressed in terms of categorical agreement and essential agreement. Errors were expressed as very major error (VME: false-susceptible) and major error (ME: false-resistance) by AD/E test. VME and ME of 3% disagreement were considered unacceptable. Results Colistin resistance was found in 27 (13.5%) isolates by BMD method. The VME rates of both AD (11%) and E test (37%) could not meet the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute recommendation (< 3% VME rate is acceptable) as alternative tests to the reference BMD. Colistin NP test showed sensitivity and specificity of 85% and 98%, respectively. The percentage discordant result in NP test was highest in Enterobacter spp. (17%). None of the 27 colistin resistant isolates showed presence of mcr-1 and mcr-2 genes. Conclusion High VME rate in AD and E tests precludes their use as alternatives to BMD for colistin susceptibility testing. NP test with moderate sensitivity but excellent specificity can be a good alternative for testing colistin susceptibility in CRE isolates, except in Enterobacter spp. Absence of mcr-1 and mcr-2 gene necessitates the exploration of other mechanisms of colistin resistance.

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing for Staphylococcus lugdunensis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanne S.K. Teh ◽  
Ioanna Pantelis ◽  
Xiao Chen ◽  
Tania Sadlon ◽  
Kelly Papanaoum ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Resistant Isolate ◽  
Disc Diffusion ◽  
Broth Microdilution ◽  
Major Error ◽  
Staphylococcus Lugdunensis ◽  
Zone Diameter ◽  
Oxacillin Resistance ◽  
Zone Edge

Evaluation of penicillin and oxacillin susceptibility testing was conducted on two hundred Staphylococcus lugdunensis isolates. Disc diffusion with penicillin 1 IU (P1, EUCAST) and penicillin 10 IU (P10, CLSI) was compared with nitrocefin discs (Cefinase®) and automated broth microdilution (Vitek2®). Oxacillin susceptibility was extrapolated from cefoxitin 30μg disc diffusion (FOX) and compared with Vitek2®. Reference methods were blaZ and mecA PCR. Penicillin zone diameter and zone edge correlated with blaZ in all except two P10 susceptible isolates (VME; very major error) and one P1 resistant isolate (ME). One hundred and forty-eight isolates were blaZ -negative of which one hundred and forty-six and one hundred and forty-nine isolates were susceptible by P1 and P10 respectively. One hundred and twenty-seven isolates were penicillin susceptible by Vitek2®. Vitek2® overcalled resistance in twenty-one blaZ -negative, twenty P1 and twenty-two P10 susceptible isolates (Vitek2® ME rate, 14.2%). Two mecA -positive isolates were oxacillin resistant by FOX and Vitek2® (categorical agreement). However, eighteen FOX susceptible, mecA -negative isolates tested resistant by Vitek2®. In conclusion, Vitek2® over-estimated penicillin and oxacillin resistance compared with disc diffusion and PCR. Disc diffusion with zone edge interpretation was more accurate and specific than automated broth microdilution for S. lugdunensis in our study.

scholarly journals Variation in erythromycin and clindamycin susceptibilities of Streptococcus pneumoniae by four test methods.

1997 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
E L Fasola ◽  
S Bajaksouzian ◽  
P C Appelbaum ◽  
M R Jacobs
Keyword(s):  
Streptococcus Pneumoniae ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Ambient Air ◽  
Test Methods ◽  
Disk Diffusion ◽  
Broth Microdilution ◽  
Microdilution Method ◽  
Broth Microdilution Method ◽  
Agar Dilution ◽  
Resistant Strains

Susceptibilities of 124 strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae to erythromycin and clindamycin were determined by the National Committee for the Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) broth microdilution method, with incubation for 20 to 24 h in ambient air and with modifications of this method by incubation for up to 48 h in air and CO2. Strains were also tested by agar dilution, E-test, and disk diffusion; good correlation was obtained with these methods, with clear separation into bimodal populations of susceptible and resistant stains. The broth microdilution method, however, using incubation in air for 24 h (NCCLS method), misclassified 4 of 92 erythromycin-resistant strains (1 as susceptible and 3 as intermediate) and 25 of 58 clindamycin-resistant strains (all as susceptible). With the exception of one strain with clindamycin, susceptible and resistant strains were correctly classified by the microdilution method with incubation in CO2 for 24 h or in ambient air for 48 h. Disk diffusion, agar dilution, and E-test methods with incubation in 5% CO2 are therefore reliable methods for susceptibility testing of pneumococci against these agents. However, the NCCLS microdilution method, which specifies incubation for 20 to 24 h in ambient air, produced significant very major errors (43%) clindamycin. Modification of the microdilution method by incubation in 5% CO2 or by extension of incubation time in ambient air to 48 h corrected these errors. Disk diffusion, however, was shown to be a simple, convenient, and reliable method for susceptibility testing of pneumococci to erythromycin and clindamycin and is suggested as the method of choice for these agents.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document