scholarly journals DNA in transcriptionally silent chromatin assumes a distinct topology that is sensitive to cell cycle progression.

1997 ◽  
Vol 17 (12) ◽  
pp. 7077-7087 ◽  
Author(s):  
X Bi ◽  
J R Broach

Transcriptionally silent regions of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome, the silent mating type loci and telomeres, represent the yeast equivalent of metazoan heterochromatin. To gain insight into the nature of silenced chromatin structure, we have examined the topology of DNA spanning the HML silent mating type locus by determining the superhelical density of mini-circles excised from HML (HML circles) by site-specific recombination. We observed that HML circles excised in a wild-type (SIR+) strain were more negatively supercoiled upon deproteinization than were the same circles excised in a sir- strain, in which silencing was abolished, even when HML alleles in which neither circle was transcriptionally competent were used. cis-acting sites flanking HML, called silencers, are required in the chromosome for establishment and inheritance of silencing. HML circles excised without silencers from cells arrested at any point in the cell cycle retained SIR-dependent differences in superhelical density. However, progression through the cell cycle converted SIR+ HML circles to a form resembling that of circles from sir- cells. This decay was not observed with circles carrying a silencer. These results establish that (i) DNA in transcriptionally silenced chromatin assumes a distinct topology reflecting a distinct organization of silenced versus active chromatin; (ii) the altered chromatin structure in silenced regions likely results from changes in packaging of individual nucleosomes, rather than changes in nucleosome density; and (iii) cell cycle progression disrupts the silenced chromatin structure, a process that is counteracted by silencers.

2020 ◽  
Vol 117 (35) ◽  
pp. 21609-21617
Author(s):  
Zhenxing Liu ◽  
Christopher P. Selby ◽  
Yanyan Yang ◽  
Laura A. Lindsey-Boltz ◽  
Xuemei Cao ◽  
...  

The circadian clock is a global regulatory mechanism that controls the expression of 50 to 80% of transcripts in mammals. Some of the genes controlled by the circadian clock are oncogenes or tumor suppressors. Among theseMychas been the focus of several studies which have investigated the effect of clock genes and proteins onMyctranscription and MYC protein stability. Other studies have focused on effects ofMycmutation or overproduction on the circadian clock in comparison to their effects on cell cycle progression and tumorigenesis. Here we have used mice with mutations in the essential clock genesBmal1,Cry1,andCry2to gain further insight into the effect of the circadian clock on this important oncogene/oncoprotein and tumorigenesis. We find that mutation of bothCry1andCry2, which abolishes the negative arm of the clock transcription–translation feedback loop (TTFL), causes down-regulation of c-MYC, and mutation ofBmal1,which abolishes the positive arm of TTFL, causes up-regulation of the c-MYC protein level in mouse spleen. These findings must be taken into account in models of the clock disruption–cancer connection.


1981 ◽  
Vol 136 (2) ◽  
pp. 279-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zbigniew Darzynkiewicz ◽  
Frank Traganos ◽  
Shao-Bai Xue ◽  
Myron R. Melamed

Author(s):  
Vivek B. Raina ◽  
Gerben Vader

SummaryCheckpoints cascades coordinate cell cycle progression with essential chromosomal processes. During meiotic G2/prophase, recombination and chromosome synapsis are monitored by what are considered distinct checkpoints [1–3]. In budding yeast, the AAA+ ATPase Pch2 is thought to specifically promote cell cycle delay in response to synapsis defects [4–6]. However, unperturbed pch2Δ cells are delayed in meiotic G2/prophase [6], suggesting paradoxical roles for Pch2 in cell cycle progression. Here, we provide insight into the checkpoint roles of Pch2 and its connection to Hop1, a HORMA domain-containing client protein. Contrary to current understanding, we find that the Pch2-Hop1 module is crucial for checkpoint function in response to both recombination and synapsis defects, thus revealing a shared meiotic checkpoint cascade. Meiotic checkpoint responses are transduced by DNA break-dependent phosphorylation of Hop1 [7, 8]. Based on our data and on the effect of Pch2 on HORMA topology [9–11], we propose that Pch2 promotes checkpoint proficiency by catalyzing the availability of signaling-competent Hop1. Conversely, we demonstrate that Pch2 can act as a checkpoint silencer, also in the face of persistent DNA repair defects. We establish a framework in which Pch2 and Hop1 form a homeostatic module that governs general meiotic checkpoint function. We show that this module can - depending on the cellular context - fuel or extinguish meiotic checkpoint function, which explains the contradictory roles of Pch2 in cell cycle control. Within the meiotic checkpoint, the Pch2-Hop1 module thus operates analogous to the Pch2/TRIP13-Mad2 module in the spindle assembly checkpoint that monitors chromosome segregation [12–16].


eLife ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yui Jin ◽  
Lois S Weisman

Organelles are distributed to daughter cells, via inheritance pathways. However, it is unclear whether there are mechanisms beyond inheritance, which ensure that organelles are present in all cells. Here we present the unexpected finding that the yeast vacuole plays a positive essential role in initiation of the cell-cycle. When inheritance fails, a new vacuole is generated. We show that this occurs prior to the next cell-cycle, and gain insight into this alternative pathway. Moreover, we find that a combination of a defect in inheritance with an acute block in the vacuole biogenesis results in the loss of a functional vacuole and a specific arrest of cells in early G1 phase. Furthermore, this role for the vacuole in cell-cycle progression requires an intact TORC1-SCH9 pathway that can only signal from a mature vacuole. These mechanisms may serve as a checkpoint for the presence of the vacuole/lysosome.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Willis ◽  
Henrik Jönsson ◽  
Kerwyn Casey Huang

SummaryHigh-throughput imaging has led to an explosion of observations regarding cell-size homeostasis across the kingdoms of life. Among bacteria, “adder” behavior in which a constant size appears to be added during each cell cycle is ubiquitous, while various eukaryotes show other size-homeostasis behaviors. Since interactions between cell-cycle progression and growth ultimately determine size-homeostasis behaviors, we developed a general model of cell proliferation to: 1) discover how the requirement of cell-size homeostasis limits mechanisms of cell-cycle control; 2) predict how features of cell-cycle control translate into size-homeostasis measurements. Our analyses revealed plausible cell-cycle control scenarios that nevertheless fail to regulate cell size, conditions that generate apparent adder behavior without underlying adder mechanisms, cell-cycle features that play unintuitive roles in causing deviations from adder, and distinguishing predictions for extended size-homeostasis statistics according to the underlying control mechanism. The model thus provides holistic insight into the mechanistic implications of cell-size homeostasis measurements.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 1035-1035
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Malik ◽  
Jacquelyn Lillis ◽  
Michael Getman ◽  
Laurie A Steiner

Abstract Chromatin condensation culminating in enucleation is a hallmark of erythropoiesis, however the mechanisms driving this process are incompletely understood. Setd8 is the sole enzyme that can mono-methylate histone H4, lysine 20 (H4K20me1) and is an important regulator of cell cycle progression, higher order chromatin structure, and genome stability. (Reviewed in Beck, Genes and Development, 2010) Setd8 and H4K20me1 are unique among epigenetic regulators in that their expression is dynamically regulated during the cell cycle. Setd8 expression peaks during G2/M, where it promotes mitotic chromatin condensation, and becomes undetectable during S-phase due to ubiquitin dependent destruction. (Oda, Mol Cell, 2010) The presence of H4K20me1 mirrors that of Setd8, peaking in G2/M, and reaching a nadir during S-phase due to removal by the histone demethylase PHF8. (Liu, Nature, 2010) Interestingly, Setd8 is expressed at levels 8- to 10- fold higher in CD71+ erythroblasts than in any other cell type, (Wu Genome Biology,2009) suggesting that it has an erythroid-specific function. We hypothesize that Setd8 drives chromatin condensation in maturing erythroblasts. In cell lines, forced accumulation of H4K20me1 during S-phase due to perturbation of either Setd8 or PHF8 results in pre-mitotic chromatin condensation (Centore Mol Cell 2010; Liu Nature 2010). We demonstrate that primary erythroblasts express Setd8 and accumulate H4K20me1 throughout the cell cycle, suggesting that Setd8 and H4K20me1 in promote chromatin condensation during terminal maturation. We further demonstrate that Setd8 is essential for erythropoiesis, with erythroid-specific Setd8 deletion resulting in profound anemia that is lethal by E12.5. The early onset of anemia indicates a defect in the primitive erythroid lineage, which emerges from the yolk sac at E8.5, and proliferates, matures, and enucleates in the circulation as a semi-synchronous cohort. (Kingsley, Blood, 2004) Detailed analyses of Setd8-null erythroblasts revealed severe defects in cell cycle progression, increased DNA content suggesting loss of genomic integrity, accumulation of DNA damage, and a modest increase in the rate of apoptosis. Global transcriptome analyses demonstrated that Setd8-null erythroblasts had activation of checkpoint genes such as CDKN1a and Gene Set Enrichment Analyses identified significant enrichment of cell cycle and p53 signaling pathways. Despite evidence of p53 activation, concomitant p53 deletion was not able to rescue the Set8-null phenotype, indicating that Setd8 has an essential role in promoting erythroid proliferation and survival that is independent of the p53 pathway. Consistent with our hypothesis that Setd8 drives chromatin condensation in maturing erythroblasts, the nuclear area of Setd8-null cells was nearly twice that of controls at E11.5 (119 and 69 um2, respectively p<0.0003). Transmission electron microscopy confirmed a profound defect in global chromatin condensation in the Setd8-null cells. Unexpectedly, heterochromatin was nearly absent from the Setd8-null cells, with the Setd8-null cells containing only a small amount of heterochromatin localized to the nuclear periphery. To determine the impact of Setd8 deletion on local chromatin structure, we performed ATAC-seq (Assay for Transposase Accessible Chromatin) on sorted populations of Setd8-null and control erythroblasts. Preliminary analyses of ATAC-seq data identified 364 ATAC peaks present in the Setd8-null cells but not in controls (p<0.001). Intriguingly, Gene Ontogeny analyses of the genes nearest to those regions was significant for multiple terms associated with higher order chromatin structure including "regulation of chromatin organization" and "positive regulation of histone deacetylation." Taken together, our results indicate that erythroblasts have adapted an essential cell cycle regulator to drive chromatin condensation during terminal maturation. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document