scholarly journals The Host Gene for Intronic U17 Small Nucleolar RNAs in Mammals Has No Protein-Coding Potential and Is a Member of the 5′-Terminal Oligopyrimidine Gene Family

1998 ◽  
Vol 18 (8) ◽  
pp. 4509-4518 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pawel Pelczar ◽  
Witold Filipowicz
Keyword(s):  
Ribosomal Proteins ◽  
Ribosome Biogenesis ◽  
Transcription Unit ◽  
Host Gene ◽  
Small Nucleolar Rnas ◽  
Ribosomal Protein Genes ◽  
Protein Coding ◽  
Genes Encoding ◽  
Terminal Oligopyrimidine ◽  
Nucleolar Rnas

ABSTRACT Intron-encoded U17a and U17b RNAs are members of the H/ACA-box class of small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) participating in rRNA processing and modification. We have investigated the organization and expression of the U17 locus in human cells and found that intronic U17a and U17b sequences are transcribed as part of the three-exon transcription unit, named U17HG, positioned approximately 9 kb upstream of the RCC1 locus. Comparison of the human and mouse U17HG genes has revealed that snoRNA-encoding intron sequences but not exon sequences are conserved between the two species and that neither human nor mouse spliced U17HGpoly(A)+ RNAs have the potential to code for proteins. Analyses of polysome profiles and effects of translation inhibitors on the abundance of U17HG RNA in HeLa cells indicated that despite its cytoplasmic localization, little if any U17HGRNA is associated with polysomes. This distinguishes U17HGRNA from another non-protein-coding snoRNA host gene product,UHG RNA, described previously (K. T. Tycowski, M. D. Shu, and J. A. Steitz, Nature 379:464–466, 1996). Determination of the 5′ terminus of the U17HG RNA revealed that transcription of the U17HG gene starts with a C residue followed by a polypyrimidine tract, making this gene a member of the 5′-terminal oligopyrimidine (5′TOP) family, which includes genes encoding ribosomal proteins and some translation factors. Interestingly, other known snoRNA host genes, including theUHG gene (Tycowski et al., op. cit.), have features of the 5′TOP genes. Similar characteristics of the transcription start site regions in snoRNA host and ribosomal protein genes raise the possibility that expression of components of ribosome biogenesis and translational machineries is coregulated.

scholarly journals Identification of Genes That Function in the Biogenesis and Localization of Small Nucleolar RNAs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

2008 ◽  
Vol 28 (11) ◽  
pp. 3686-3699 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui Qiu ◽  
Julia Eifert ◽  
Ludivine Wacheul ◽  
Marc Thiry ◽  
Adam C. Berger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Ribosome Biogenesis ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Cajal Body ◽  
Temperature Sensitive ◽  
Small Nucleolar Rnas ◽  
Animal Cells ◽  
U3 Snorna ◽  
Genes Encoding ◽  
Nucleolar Rnas

ABSTRACT Small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) orchestrate the modification and cleavage of pre-rRNA and are essential for ribosome biogenesis. Recent data suggest that after nucleoplasmic synthesis, snoRNAs transiently localize to the Cajal body (in plant and animal cells) or the homologous nucleolar body (in budding yeast) for maturation and assembly into snoRNPs prior to accumulation in their primary functional site, the nucleolus. However, little is known about the trans-acting factors important for the intranuclear trafficking and nucleolar localization of snoRNAs. Here, we describe a large-scale genetic screen to identify proteins important for snoRNA transport in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We performed fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis to visualize U3 snoRNA localization in a collection of temperature-sensitive yeast mutants. We have identified Nop4, Prp21, Tao3, Sec14, and Htl1 as proteins important for the proper localization of U3 snoRNA. Mutations in genes encoding these proteins lead to specific defects in the targeting or retention of the snoRNA to either the nucleolar body or the nucleolus. Additional characterization of the mutants revealed impairment in specific steps of U3 snoRNA processing, demonstrating that snoRNA maturation and trafficking are linked processes.

scholarly journals The Arabidopsis 2′-O-Ribose-Methylation and Pseudouridylation Landscape of rRNA in Comparison to Human and Yeast

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deniz Streit ◽  
Enrico Schleiff
Keyword(s):  
Arabidopsis Thaliana ◽  
Ribosomal Rna ◽  
Ribosomal Dna ◽  
Ribosomal Proteins ◽  
Ribosome Biogenesis ◽  
Ribosome Assembly ◽  
Small Nucleolar Rnas ◽  
General Process ◽  
Specific Factors ◽  
Nucleolar Rnas

Eukaryotic ribosome assembly starts in the nucleolus, where the ribosomal DNA (rDNA) is transcribed into the 35S pre-ribosomal RNA (pre-rRNA). More than two-hundred ribosome biogenesis factors (RBFs) and more than two-hundred small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNA) catalyze the processing, folding and modification of the rRNA in Arabidopsis thaliana. The initial pre-ribosomal 90S complex is formed already during transcription by association of ribosomal proteins (RPs) and RBFs. In addition, small nucleolar ribonucleoprotein particles (snoRNPs) composed of snoRNAs and RBFs catalyze the two major rRNA modification types, 2′-O-ribose-methylation and pseudouridylation. Besides these two modifications, rRNAs can also undergo base methylations and acetylation. However, the latter two modifications have not yet been systematically explored in plants. The snoRNAs of these snoRNPs serve as targeting factors to direct modifications to specific rRNA regions by antisense elements. Today, hundreds of different sites of modifications in the rRNA have been described for eukaryotic ribosomes in general. While our understanding of the general process of ribosome biogenesis has advanced rapidly, the diversities appearing during plant ribosome biogenesis is beginning to emerge. Today, more than two-hundred RBFs were identified by bioinformatics or biochemical approaches, including several plant specific factors. Similarly, more than two hundred snoRNA were predicted based on RNA sequencing experiments. Here, we discuss the predicted and verified rRNA modification sites and the corresponding identified snoRNAs on the example of the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Our summary uncovers the plant modification sites in comparison to the human and yeast modification sites.

scholarly journals Principles of 60S ribosomal subunit assembly emerging from recent studies in yeast

2017 ◽  
Vol 474 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salini Konikkat ◽  
John L. Woolford,
Keyword(s):  
Ribosomal Rna ◽  
Ribosomal Proteins ◽  
Ribosome Biogenesis ◽  
Ribosomal Subunit ◽  
Ribosome Assembly ◽  
Small Nucleolar Rnas ◽  
Large Ribosomal Subunit ◽  
Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Subunit Assembly ◽  
Nucleolar Rnas

Ribosome biogenesis requires the intertwined processes of folding, modification, and processing of ribosomal RNA, together with binding of ribosomal proteins. In eukaryotic cells, ribosome assembly begins in the nucleolus, continues in the nucleoplasm, and is not completed until after nascent particles are exported to the cytoplasm. The efficiency and fidelity of ribosome biogenesis are facilitated by >200 assembly factors and ∼76 different small nucleolar RNAs. The pathway is driven forward by numerous remodeling events to rearrange the ribonucleoprotein architecture of pre-ribosomes. Here, we describe principles of ribosome assembly that have emerged from recent studies of biogenesis of the large ribosomal subunit in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We describe tools that have empowered investigations of ribosome biogenesis, and then summarize recent discoveries about each of the consecutive steps of subunit assembly.

scholarly journals Are spliced ncRNA host genes distinct classes of lncRNAs?

2020 ◽  
Vol 139 (4) ◽  
pp. 349-359
Author(s):  
Rituparno Sen ◽  
Jörg Fallmann ◽  
Maria Emília M. T. Walter ◽  
Peter F. Stadler
Keyword(s):  
Gene Function ◽  
Negative Answer ◽  
Positive Answer ◽  
Host Gene ◽  
Small Nucleolar Rnas ◽  
Biological Functions ◽  
Protein Coding ◽  
Non Coding Rnas ◽  
Nucleolar Rnas ◽  
Host Genes

AbstractMany small nucleolar RNAs and many of the hairpin precursors of miRNAs are processed from long non-protein-coding host genes. In contrast to their highly conserved and heavily structured payload, the host genes feature poorly conserved sequences. Nevertheless, there is mounting evidence that the host genes have biological functions beyond their primary task of carrying a ncRNA as payload. So far, no connections between the function of the host genes and the function of their payloads have been reported. Here we investigate whether there is evidence for an association of host gene function or mechanisms with the type of payload. To assess this hypothesis we test whether the miRNA host genes (MIRHGs), snoRNA host genes (SNHGs), and other lncRNA host genes can be distinguished based on sequence and/or structure features unrelated to their payload. A positive answer would imply a functional and mechanistic correlation between host genes and their payload, provided the classification does not depend on the presence and type of the payload. A negative answer would indicate that to the extent that secondary functions are acquired, they are not strongly constrained by the prior, primary function of the payload. We find that the three classes can be distinguished reliably when the classifier is allowed to extract features from the payloads. They become virtually indistinguishable, however, as soon as only sequence and structure of parts of the host gene distal from the snoRNAs or miRNA payload is used for classification. This indicates that the functions of MIRHGs and SNHGs are largely independent of the functions of their payloads. Furthermore, there is no evidence that the MIRHGs and SNHGs form coherent classes of long non-coding RNAs distinguished by features other than their payloads.

Novel intron-encoded small nucleolar RNAs with long sequence complementarities to mature rRNAs involved in ribosome biogenesis

1995 ◽  
Vol 73 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 835-843 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Pierre Bachellerie ◽  
Monique Nicoloso ◽  
Liang-Hu Qu ◽  
Bernard Michot ◽  
Michèle Caizergues-Ferrer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ribosomal Proteins ◽  
Ribosome Biogenesis ◽  
18S Rrna ◽  
Structural Basis ◽  
28S Rrna ◽  
Cis Acting ◽  
Nucleolar Proteins ◽  
Genes Encoding ◽  
Mouse Cells ◽  
Nucleolar Rnas

Recently, several new snoRNAs encoded in introns of genes coding for ribosomal, ribosome-associated, or nucleolar proteins have been discovered. We are presently studying four of these intronic snoRNAs. Three of them, U20, U21, and U24, are closely related to each other on a structural basis. They are included in genes encoding nucleolin and ribosomal proteins L5 and L7a, respectively, in warm-blooded vertebrates. These three metabolically stable snoRNAs interact with nucleolar protein fibrillarin. In addition, they display common features that make them strikingly related to snoRNA U14. U14 contains two tracts of complementarity to 18S rRNA, which are required for the production of 18S rRNA. U20 displays a 21 nucleotide (nt) long complementarity to 18S rRNA. U21 contains a 13 nt complementarity to an invariant sequence in eukaryotic 28S rRNA. U24 has two separate 12 nt long complementarities to a highly conserved tract of 28S rRNA. Phylogenetic evidences support the fundamental importance of the pairings of these three snoRNAs to pre-rRNA, which could be involved in a control of pre-rRNA folding during preribosome assembly. By transfection of mouse cells, we have also analyzed the processing of U20 and found that the -cis acting signals for its processing from intronic RNA are restricted to the mature snoRNA sequence. Finally, we have documented changes of host genes for these three intronic snoRNAs during the evolution of eukaryotes.Key words: snoRNA, pre-rRNA, folding, genes, introns.

Characterization of Arabidopsis thaliana lines with T-DNA insertions in the mitochondrial ribosomal protein genes Rps14 and Rps19

2019 ◽  
Vol 79 (02) ◽  
Author(s):  
Suman Lata ◽  
Anshul Watts ◽  
S. R. Bhat
Keyword(s):  
Arabidopsis Thaliana ◽  
Ribosomal Protein ◽  
Ribosomal Proteins ◽  
Ribosomal Protein Genes ◽  
Protein Coding ◽  
Mitochondrial Ribosomal Protein ◽  
Genes Encoding ◽  
Coordinated Expression ◽  
Dna Insertion ◽  
Mutant Lines

In Arabidopsis, most of the genes encoding mitochondrial ribosomal proteins are located in the nucleus and only seven are present in the mitochondrial genome. Assembly of a functional ribosome requires coordinated expression of ribosomal protein encoding genes located in both these organelles. Genes and promoters of nuclear encoded mitochondrial ribosomal protein coding genes of plants have not been well characterized so far. In the present study we have characterized Arabidopsis thaliana SALK mutant lines with T-DNA insertion in Rps14 or Rps19 gene. The location of T-DNA insertion in the mutant lines was confirmed and plants homozygous and hemizygous for TDNA insertion were identified for both Rps14 and Rps19 genes. In homozygous T-DNA mutant lines of both Rps14 and Rps19 genes, the expression was estimated using RTPCR. Rps14 and Rps19 transcripts similar to wild type were present in homozygous mutant plants of Rps14 and Rps19 which indicated that T-DNA insertion has not affected their expression.

scholarly journals Supervised and Unsupervised Classification of lncRNA Subtypes

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rituparno Sen ◽  
Jörg Fallmann ◽  
Maria Emília M. T. Walter ◽  
Peter F. Stadler
Keyword(s):  
Unsupervised Classification ◽  
Positive Answer ◽  
Host Gene ◽  
Small Nucleolar Rnas ◽  
Biological Functions ◽  
Protein Coding ◽  
Non Coding Rnas ◽  
Nucleolar Rnas ◽  
Host Genes

AbstractMany small nucleolar RNAs and many of the hairpin precursors of miRNAs are processed from long non-protein-coding (lncRNA) host genes. In contrast to their highly conserved and heavily structured payload, the host genes feature poorly conserved sequences. Nevertheless there is mounting evidence that the host genes have biological functions. No obvious connections between the function of the host genes and the function of their payloads have been reported. Here we inverstigate whether there is an association of host gene function or mechanisms with the type of payload. To assess this hypothesis we test whether the miRNA host genes (MIRHGs), snoRNA host genes (SNHGs), and other lncRNAs host genes can be distinguished based on sequence and structure features. A positive answer would imply a correlation between host genes and their payload. While the three classes can be distinguished reliably when the classifier is allowed to extract features from the payloads, this is no longer the case when only sequence and structure of parts of the host gene distal from the snoRNAs or miRNA payload is used for classification. Our data indicate that the functions of MIRHGs and SNHGs are largely independent of the functions of their payloads. Furthermore, there is no evidence that the MIRHGs and SNHGs form coherent classes of long non-coding RNAs distinguished by features other than their payloads.

scholarly journals Annotation of snoRNA abundance across human tissues reveals complex snoRNA-host gene relationships

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Étienne Fafard-Couture ◽  
Danny Bergeron ◽  
Sonia Couture ◽  
Sherif Abou-Elela ◽  
Michelle S. Scott
Keyword(s):  
Housekeeping Genes ◽  
Host Gene ◽  
Rna Modification ◽  
Human Tissues ◽  
Rna Seq ◽  
Healthy Human ◽  
Protein Coding ◽  
Conservation Level ◽  
Nucleolar Rnas ◽  
Host Genes

Abstract Background Small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) are mid-size non-coding RNAs required for ribosomal RNA modification, implying a ubiquitous tissue distribution linked to ribosome synthesis. However, increasing numbers of studies identify extra-ribosomal roles of snoRNAs in modulating gene expression, suggesting more complex snoRNA abundance patterns. Therefore, there is a great need for mapping the snoRNome in different human tissues as the blueprint for snoRNA functions. Results We used a low structure bias RNA-Seq approach to accurately quantify snoRNAs and compare them to the entire transcriptome in seven healthy human tissues (breast, ovary, prostate, testis, skeletal muscle, liver, and brain). We identify 475 expressed snoRNAs categorized in two abundance classes that differ significantly in their function, conservation level, and correlation with their host gene: 390 snoRNAs are uniformly expressed and 85 are enriched in the brain or reproductive tissues. Most tissue-enriched snoRNAs are embedded in lncRNAs and display strong correlation of abundance with them, whereas uniformly expressed snoRNAs are mostly embedded in protein-coding host genes and are mainly non- or anticorrelated with them. Fifty-nine percent of the non-correlated or anticorrelated protein-coding host gene/snoRNA pairs feature dual-initiation promoters, compared to only 16% of the correlated non-coding host gene/snoRNA pairs. Conclusions Our results demonstrate that snoRNAs are not a single homogeneous group of housekeeping genes but include highly regulated tissue-enriched RNAs. Indeed, our work indicates that the architecture of snoRNA host genes varies to uncouple the host and snoRNA expressions in order to meet the different snoRNA abundance levels and functional needs of human tissues.

Eukaryotic Ribosome Assembly

2019 ◽  
Vol 88 (1) ◽  
pp. 281-306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jochen Baßler ◽  
Ed Hurt
Keyword(s):  
Ribosomal Rna ◽  
Nuclear Export ◽  
Ribosomal Proteins ◽  
Ribosome Biogenesis ◽  
Cryo Electron Microscopy ◽  
A Cell ◽  
Cellular Pathways ◽  
Nucleolar Rnas ◽  
Shed Light

Ribosomes, which synthesize the proteins of a cell, comprise ribosomal RNA and ribosomal proteins, which coassemble hierarchically during a process termed ribosome biogenesis. Historically, biochemical and molecular biology approaches have revealed how preribosomal particles form and mature in consecutive steps, starting in the nucleolus and terminating after nuclear export into the cytoplasm. However, only recently, due to the revolution in cryo–electron microscopy, could pseudoatomic structures of different preribosomal particles be obtained. Together with in vitro maturation assays, these findings shed light on how nascent ribosomes progress stepwise along a dynamic biogenesis pathway. Preribosomes assemble gradually, chaperoned by a myriad of assembly factors and small nucleolar RNAs, before they reach maturity and enter translation. This information will lead to a better understanding of how ribosome synthesis is linked to other cellular pathways in humans and how it can cause diseases, including cancer, if disturbed.

scholarly journals Genome-Wide Analysis of mRNA Stability Using Transcription Inhibitors and Microarrays Reveals Posttranscriptional Control of Ribosome Biogenesis Factors

2004 ◽  
Vol 24 (12) ◽  
pp. 5534-5547 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jörg Grigull ◽  
Sanie Mnaimneh ◽  
Jeffrey Pootoolal ◽  
Mark D. Robinson ◽  
Timothy R. Hughes
Keyword(s):  
Heat Stress ◽  
Microarray Data ◽  
Mrna Stability ◽  
Ribosomal Proteins ◽  
Ribosome Biogenesis ◽  
Transcriptional Response ◽  
Rrna Synthesis ◽  
Ribosome Assembly ◽  
Genome Wide ◽  
Genes Encoding

ABSTRACT Using DNA microarrays, we compared global transcript stability profiles following chemical inhibition of transcription to rpb1-1 (a temperature-sensitive allele of yeast RNA polymerase II). Among the five inhibitors tested, the effects of thiolutin and 1,10-phenanthroline were most similar to rpb1-1. A comparison to various microarray data already in the literature revealed similarity between mRNA stability profiles and the transcriptional response to stresses such as heat shock, consistent with the fact that the general stress response includes a transient shutoff of general mRNA transcription. Genes encoding factors involved in rRNA synthesis and ribosome assembly, which are often observed to be coordinately down-regulated in yeast microarray data, were among the least stable transcripts. We examined the effects of deletions of genes encoding deadenylase components Ccr4p and Pan2p and putative RNA-binding proteins Pub1p and Puf4p on the genome-wide pattern of mRNA stability after inhibition of transcription by chemicals and/or heat stress. This examination showed that Ccr4p, the major yeast mRNA deadenylase, contributes to the degradation of transcripts encoding both ribosomal proteins and rRNA synthesis and ribosome assembly factors and mediates a large part of the transcriptional response to heat stress. Pan2p and Puf4p also contributed to the degradation rate of these mRNAs following transcriptional shutoff, while Pub1p preferentially stabilized transcripts encoding ribosomal proteins. Our results indicate that the abundance of ribosome biogenesis factors is controlled at the level of mRNA stability.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document