scholarly journals RAD51 Is Required for the Repair of Plasmid Double-Stranded DNA Gaps from Either Plasmid or Chromosomal Templates

2000 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 1194-1205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephan Bärtsch ◽  
Leslie E. Kang ◽  
Lorraine S. Symington
Keyword(s):  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Crossing Over ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Radiation Chemical ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Independent Events ◽  
In The Wild ◽  
A Minor

ABSTRACT DNA double-strand breaks may be induced by endonucleases, ionizing radiation, chemical agents, and mechanical forces or by replication of single-stranded nicked chromosomes. Repair of double-strand breaks can occur by homologous recombination or by nonhomologous end joining. A system was developed to measure the efficiency of plasmid gap repair by homologous recombination using either chromosomal or plasmid templates. Gap repair was biased toward gene conversion events unassociated with crossing over using either donor sequence. The dependence of recombinational gap repair on genes belonging to the RAD52epistasis group was tested in this system. RAD51,RAD52, RAD57, and RAD59 were required for efficient gap repair using either chromosomal or plasmid donors. No homologous recombination products were recovered fromrad52 mutants, whereas a low level of repair occurred in the absence of RAD51, RAD57, orRAD59. These results suggest a minor pathway of strand invasion that is dependent on RAD52 but not onRAD51. The residual repair events in rad51mutants were more frequently associated with crossing over than was observed in the wild-type strain, suggesting that the mechanisms forRAD51-dependent and RAD51-independent events are different. Plasmid gap repair was reduced synergistically inrad51 rad59 double mutants, indicating an important role for RAD59 in RAD51-independent repair.

Double-strand-break-induced homologous recombination in mammalian cells

2001 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 196-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. D. Johnson ◽  
M. Jasin
Keyword(s):  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Indirect Evidence ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Crossing Over ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks

In mammalian cells, the repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) occurs by both homologous and non-homologous mechanisms. Indirect evidence, including that from gene targeting and random integration experiments, had suggested that non-homologous mechanisms were significantly more frequent than homologous ones. However, more recent experiments indicate that homologous recombination is also a prominent DSB repair pathway. These experiments show that mammalian cells use homologous sequences located at multiple positions throughout the genome to repair a DSB. However, template preference appears to be biased, with the sister chromatid being preferred by 2–3 orders of magnitude over a homologous or heterologous chromosome. The outcome of homologous recombination in mammalian cells is predominantly gene conversion that is not associated with crossing-over. The preference for the sister chromatid and the bias against crossing-over seen in mitotic mammalian cells may have developed in order to reduce the potential for genome alterations that could occur when other homologous repair templates are utilized. In attempts to understand further the mechanism of homologous recombination, the proteins that promote this process are beginning to be identified. To date, four mammalian proteins have been demonstrated conclusively to be involved in DSB repair by homologous recombination: Rad54, XRCC2, XRCC3 and BRCAI. This paper summarizes results from a number of recent studies.

scholarly journals SPO16 binds SHOC1 to promote homologous recombination and crossing-over in meiotic prophase I

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. eaau9780 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qianting Zhang ◽  
Shu-Yan Ji ◽  
Kiran Busayavalasa ◽  
Chao Yu
Keyword(s):  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Meiotic Recombination ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Crossing Over ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Homologous Chromosomes ◽  
Recombination Nodules ◽  
Evolutionarily Conserved

Segregation of homologous chromosomes in meiosis I is tightly regulated by their physical links, or crossovers (COs), generated from DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) through meiotic homologous recombination. In budding yeast, three ZMM (Zip1/2/3/4, Mer3, Msh4/5) proteins, Zip2, Zip4, and Spo16, form a “ZZS” complex, functioning to promote meiotic recombination via a DSB repair pathway. Here, we identified the mammalian ortholog of Spo16, termed SPO16, which interacts with the mammalian ortholog of Zip2 (SHOC1/MZIP2), and whose functions are evolutionarily conserved to promote the formation of COs. SPO16 localizes to the recombination nodules, as SHOC1 and TEX11 do. SPO16 is required for stabilization of SHOC1 and proper localization of other ZMM proteins. The DSBs formed in SPO16-deleted meiocytes were repaired without COs formation, although synapsis is less affected. Therefore, formation of SPO16-SHOC1 complex–associated recombination intermediates is a key step facilitating meiotic recombination that produces COs from yeast to mammals.

scholarly journals Depletion of Akt1 and Akt2 Impairs the Repair of Radiation-Induced DNA Double Strand Breaks via Homologous Recombination

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (24) ◽  
pp. 6316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tahereh Mohammadian Gol ◽  
H. Peter Rodemann ◽  
Klaus Dittmann
Keyword(s):  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Major Protein ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Knock Out ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Protein Levels ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining

Homologous recombination repair (HRR), non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) and alternative NHEJ are major pathways that are utilized by cells for processing DNA double strand breaks (DNA-DSBs); their function plays an important role in the radiation resistance of tumor cells. Conflicting data exist regarding the role of Akt in homologous recombination (HR), i.e., the regulation of Rad51 as a major protein of this pathway. This study was designed to investigate the specific involvement of Akt isoforms in HRR. HCT116 colon cancer cells with stable AKT-knock-out and siRNA-mediated AKT-knockdown phenotypes were used to investigate the role of Akt1 and Akt2 isoforms in HR. The results clearly demonstrated that HCT116 AKT1-KO and AKT2-KO cells have a significantly reduced Rad51 foci formation 6 h post irradiation versus parental cells. Depletion of Akt1 and Akt2 protein levels as well as inhibition of Akt kinase activity resulted in an increased number of residual-γH2AX in CENP-F positive cells mainly representing the S and G2 phase cells. Furthermore, inhibition of NHEJ and HR using DNA-PK and Rad51 antagonists resulted in stronger radiosensitivity of AKT1 and AKT2 knockout cells versus wild type cells. These data collectively show that both Akt1 and Akt2 are involved in DSBs repair through HRR.

scholarly journals Different Roles for Nonhomologous End Joining and Homologous Recombination following Replication Arrest in Mammalian Cells

2002 ◽  
Vol 22 (16) ◽  
pp. 5869-5878 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cecilia Lundin ◽  
Klaus Erixon ◽  
Catherine Arnaudeau ◽  
Niklas Schultz ◽  
Dag Jenssen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Nonhomologous End Joining ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Lethal Effects ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Replication Arrest

ABSTRACT Homologous recombination (HR) and nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) play overlapping roles in repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) generated during the S phase of the cell cycle. Here, we characterized the involvement of HR and NHEJ in the rescue of DNA replication forks arrested or slowed by treatment of hamster cells with hydroxyurea or thymidine. We show that the arrest of replication with hydroxyurea generates DNA fragmentation as a consequence of the formation of DSBs at newly replicated DNA. Both HR and NHEJ protected cells from the lethal effects of hydroxyurea, and this agent also increased the frequency of recombination mediated by both homologous and nonhomologous exchanges. Thymidine induced a less stringent arrest of replication and did not generate detectable DSBs. HR alone rescued cells from the lethal effects of thymidine. Furthermore, thymidine increased the frequency of DNA exchange mediated solely by HR in the absence of detectable DSBs. Our data suggest that both NHEJ and HR are involved in repair of arrested replication forks that include a DSB, while HR alone is required for the repair of slowed replication forks in the absence of detectable DSBs.

scholarly journals A game of musical chairs: Pro- and anti-resection factors compete for TOPBP1 binding after DNA damage

2017 ◽  
Vol 216 (3) ◽  
pp. 535-537 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenji Shimada ◽  
Susan M. Gasser
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Nonhomologous End Joining ◽  
Repair Pathway ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Pathway Regulation

DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) are generally repaired through nonhomologous end joining or homologous recombination. In this issue, Liu et al. (2017. J. Cell Biol. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201607031) report that the conserved scaffold protein TOPBP1Dpb11 provides binding sites for both pro- and anti-resection factors at DSBs, providing insights into repair pathway regulation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document