scholarly journals Posttranslational Phosphorylation and Ubiquitination of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Poly(A) Polymerase at the S/G2 Stage of the Cell Cycle

2000 ◽  
Vol 20 (8) ◽  
pp. 2794-2802 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neptune Mizrahi ◽  
Claire Moore
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Sorting ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Phase Arrest ◽  
Phosphatase Treatment ◽  
M Phase ◽  
64 Kda Protein ◽  
Mitotic Phosphorylation ◽  
Cycle Regulation

ABSTRACT The poly(A) polymerase of the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Pap1) is a 64-kDa protein essential for the maturation of mRNA. We have found that a modified Pap1 of 90 kDa transiently appears in cells after release from α-factor-induced G1 arrest or from a hydroxyurea-induced S-phase arrest. While a small amount of modification occurs in hydroxyurea-arrested cells, fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis and microscopic examination of bud formation indicate that the majority of modified enzyme is found at late S/G2 and disappears by the time cells have reached M phase. The reduction of the 90-kDa product upon phosphatase treatment indicates that the altered mobility is due to phosphorylation. A preparation containing primarily the phosphorylated Pap1 has no poly(A) addition activity, but this activity is restored by phosphatase treatment. A portion of Pap1 is also polyubiquitinated concurrent with phosphorylation. However, the bulk of the 64-kDa Pap1 is a stable protein with a half-life of 14 h. The timing, nature, and extent of Pap1 modification in comparison to the mitotic phosphorylation of mammalian poly(A) polymerase suggest an intriguing difference in the cell cycle regulation of this enzyme in yeast and mammalian systems.

scholarly journals Cell Cycle Regulation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Polo-Like Kinase Cdc5p

1998 ◽  
Vol 18 (12) ◽  
pp. 7360-7370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liang Cheng ◽  
Linda Hunke ◽  
Christopher F. J. Hardy
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Regulation ◽  
Kinase Activity ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex ◽  
Mitotic Kinases ◽  
Polo Kinase ◽  
Evolutionarily Conserved ◽  
M Phase ◽  
Cycle Regulation

ABSTRACT Progression through and completion of mitosis require the actions of the evolutionarily conserved Polo kinase. We have determined that the levels of Cdc5p, a Saccharomyces cerevisiae member of the Polo family of mitotic kinases, are cell cycle regulated. Cdc5p accumulates in the nuclei of G2/M-phase cells, and its levels decline dramatically as cells progress through anaphase and begin telophase. We report that Cdc5p levels are sensitive to mutations in key components of the anaphase-promoting complex (APC). We have determined that Cdc5p-associated kinase activity is restricted to G2/M and that this activity is posttranslationally regulated. These results further link the actions of the APC to the completion of mitosis and suggest possible roles for Cdc5p during progression through and completion of mitosis.

Differential function and expression of Saccharomyces cerevisiae B-type cyclins in mitosis and meiosis

1993 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 2113-2125
Author(s):  
N Grandin ◽  
S I Reed
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Kinase Activity ◽  
Mitotic Cell ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Mitotic Cell Cycle ◽  
Meiotic Cell ◽  
Cell Cycles ◽  
M Phase ◽  
Mitotic Cyclin

We have studied the patterns of expression of four B-type cyclins (Clbs), Clb1, Clb2, Clb3, and Clb4, and their ability to activate p34cdc28 during the mitotic and meiotic cell cycles of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. During the mitotic cell cycle, Clb3 and Clb4 were expressed and induced a kinase activity in association with p34cdc28 from early S phase up to mitosis. On the other hand, Clb1 and Clb2 were expressed and activated p34cdc28 later in the mitotic cell cycle, starting in late S phase and continuing up to mitosis. The pattern of expression of Clb3 and Clb4 suggests a possible role in the regulation of DNA replication as well as mitosis. Clb1 and Clb2, whose pattern of expression is similar to that of other known Clbs, are likely to have a role predominantly in the regulation of M phase. During the meiotic cell cycle, Clb1, Clb3, and Clb4 were expressed and induced a p34cdc28-associated kinase activity just before the first meiotic division. The fact that Clb3 and Clb4 were not synthesized earlier, in S phase, suggests that these cyclins, which probably have a role in S phase during the mitotic cell cycle, are not implicated in premeiotic S phase. Clb2, the primary mitotic cyclin in S. cerevisiae, was not detectable during meiosis. Sporulation experiments on strains deleted for one, two, or three Clbs indicate, in agreement with the biochemical data, that Clb1 is the primary cyclin for the regulation of meiosis, while Clb2 is not involved at all.

scholarly journals Segregation of unreplicated chromosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals a novel G1/M-phase checkpoint.

1995 ◽  
Vol 15 (10) ◽  
pp. 5312-5321 ◽  
Author(s):  
J H Toyn ◽  
A L Johnson ◽  
L H Johnston
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Nuclear Division ◽  
Strain Differences ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Relative Timing ◽  
Checkpoint Pathway ◽  
M Phase ◽  
Normal Mitosis

Saccharomyces cerevisiae dbf4 and cdc7 cell cycle mutants block initiation of DNA synthesis (i.e., are iDS mutants) at 37 degrees C and arrest the cell cycle with a 1C DNA content. Surprisingly, certain dbf4 and cdc7 strains divide their chromatin at 37 degrees C. We found that the activation of the Cdc28 mitotic protein kinase and the Dbf2 kinase occurred with the correct relative timing with respect to each other and the observed division of the unreplicated chromatin. Furthermore, the division of unreplicated chromatin depended on a functional spindle. Therefore, the observed nuclear division resembled a normal mitosis, suggesting that S. cerevisiae commits to M phase in late G1 independently of S phase. Genetic analysis of dbf4 and cdc7 strains showed that the ability to restrain mitosis during a late G1 block depended on the genetic background of the strain concerned, since the dbf4 and cdc7 alleles examined showed the expected mitotic restraint in other backgrounds. This restraint was genetically dominant to lack of restraint, indicating that an active arrest mechanism, or checkpoint, was involved. However, none of the previously described mitotic checkpoint pathways were defective in the iDS strains that carry out mitosis without replicated DNA, therefore indicating that the checkpoint pathway that arrests mitosis in iDS mutants is novel. Thus, spontaneous strain differences have revealed that S. cerevisiae commits itself to mitosis in late G1 independently of entry into S phase and that a novel checkpoint mechanism can restrain mitosis if cells are blocked in late G1. We refer to this as the G1/M-phase checkpoint since it acts in G1 to restrain mitosis.

scholarly journals Mcm2 and Mcm3 are constitutive nuclear proteins that exhibit distinct isoforms and bind chromatin during specific cell cycle stages of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

1997 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 1587-1601 ◽  
Author(s):  
M R Young ◽  
B K Tye
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Specific Cell ◽  
Replication Origins ◽  
Proliferating Cells ◽  
M Phase ◽  
Mcm Proteins ◽  
And Function

The Mcm2-7 proteins are a family of conserved proteins whose functions are essential for the initiation of DNA synthesis in all eukaryotes. These patients are constitutively present in high abundance in actively proliferating cells. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the intracellular concentrations of Mcms are between 100 and 500 times the number of replication origins. However, these proteins are limiting for the initiation of DNA synthesis at replication origins. Our studies indicate that only a small fraction of Mcm2 and Mcm3 tightly associates with chromatin, from late M phase to the beginning of the S phase. The rest of the Mcm2 and Mcm3 proteins are disturbed to both the cytoplasm and nucleoplasm in relatively constant levels throughout the cell cycle. We also show that S. cerevisiae Mcm3 is a phosphoprotein that exists in multiple isoforms and that distinct isoforms of Mcm2 and Mcm3 can be detected at specific stages of the cell cycle. These results suggest that the localization and function of the Mcm proteins are regulated by posttranslational phosphorylation in a manner that is consistent with a role for the Mcm proteins in restricting DNA replication to once per cell cycle.

scholarly journals An advanced cell cycle tag toolbox reveals principles underlying temporal control of structure-selective nucleases

eLife ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Bittmann ◽  
Rokas Grigaitis ◽  
Lorenzo Galanti ◽  
Silas Amarell ◽  
Florian Wilfling ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Cell Cycle Regulation ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Specific Cell ◽  
Protein Functionality ◽  
M Phase ◽  
Cell Cycle Phases ◽  
Cycle Regulation

Cell cycle tags allow to restrict target protein expression to specific cell cycle phases. Here, we present an advanced toolbox of cell cycle tag constructs in budding yeast with defined and compatible peak expression that allow comparison of protein functionality at different cell cycle phases. We apply this technology to the question of how and when Mus81-Mms4 and Yen1 nucleases act on DNA replication or recombination structures. Restriction of Mus81-Mms4 to M phase but not S phase allows a wildtype response to various forms of replication perturbation and DNA damage in S phase, suggesting it acts as a post-replicative resolvase. Moreover, we use cell cycle tags to reinstall cell cycle control to a deregulated version of Yen1, showing that its premature activation interferes with the response to perturbed replication. Curbing resolvase activity and establishing a hierarchy of resolution mechanisms are therefore the principal reasons underlying resolvase cell cycle regulation.

scholarly journals Differential function and expression of Saccharomyces cerevisiae B-type cyclins in mitosis and meiosis.

1993 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 2113-2125 ◽  
Author(s):  
N Grandin ◽  
S I Reed
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Kinase Activity ◽  
Mitotic Cell ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Mitotic Cell Cycle ◽  
Meiotic Cell ◽  
Cell Cycles ◽  
M Phase ◽  
Mitotic Cyclin

We have studied the patterns of expression of four B-type cyclins (Clbs), Clb1, Clb2, Clb3, and Clb4, and their ability to activate p34cdc28 during the mitotic and meiotic cell cycles of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. During the mitotic cell cycle, Clb3 and Clb4 were expressed and induced a kinase activity in association with p34cdc28 from early S phase up to mitosis. On the other hand, Clb1 and Clb2 were expressed and activated p34cdc28 later in the mitotic cell cycle, starting in late S phase and continuing up to mitosis. The pattern of expression of Clb3 and Clb4 suggests a possible role in the regulation of DNA replication as well as mitosis. Clb1 and Clb2, whose pattern of expression is similar to that of other known Clbs, are likely to have a role predominantly in the regulation of M phase. During the meiotic cell cycle, Clb1, Clb3, and Clb4 were expressed and induced a p34cdc28-associated kinase activity just before the first meiotic division. The fact that Clb3 and Clb4 were not synthesized earlier, in S phase, suggests that these cyclins, which probably have a role in S phase during the mitotic cell cycle, are not implicated in premeiotic S phase. Clb2, the primary mitotic cyclin in S. cerevisiae, was not detectable during meiosis. Sporulation experiments on strains deleted for one, two, or three Clbs indicate, in agreement with the biochemical data, that Clb1 is the primary cyclin for the regulation of meiosis, while Clb2 is not involved at all.

scholarly journals Anoxic Fibroblasts Activate a Replication Checkpoint That Is Bypassed By E1a

2003 ◽  
Vol 23 (24) ◽  
pp. 9032-9045 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence B. Gardner ◽  
Feng Li ◽  
Xuejie Yang ◽  
Chi V. Dang
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Regulation ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Low Oxygen ◽  
Replication Checkpoint ◽  
Phase Arrest ◽  
Distinct Cell ◽  
Rat Fibroblasts ◽  
Transcription Factor E2f ◽  
Cycle Regulation

ABSTRACT Little is known about cell cycle regulation in hypoxic cells, despite its significance. We utilized an experimentally tractable model to study the proliferative responses of rat fibroblasts when rendered hypoxic (0.5% oxygen) or anoxic (<0.01% oxygen). Hypoxic cells underwent G1 arrest, whereas anoxic cells also demonstrated S-phase arrest due to suppression of DNA initiation. Upon reoxygenation, only those cells arrested in G1 were able to resume proliferation. The oncoprotein E1a induced p53-independent apoptosis in anoxic cells, which when suppressed by Bcl-2 permitted proliferation despite anoxia. E1a expression led to marked increases in the transcription factor E2F, and overexpression of E2F-1 allowed proliferation in hypoxic cells, although it had minimal effect on the anoxic suppression of DNA initiation. We thus demonstrate two distinct cell cycle responses to low oxygen and suggest that alterations that lead to increased E2F can overcome hypoxic G1 arrest but that additional alterations, promoted by E1a expression, are necessary for neoplastic cells to proliferate despite anoxia.

scholarly journals Adenovirus E4orf4 protein induces PP2A-dependent growth arrest in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and interacts with the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome

2001 ◽  
Vol 154 (2) ◽  
pp. 331-344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Kornitzer ◽  
Rakefet Sharf ◽  
Tamar Kleinberger
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Growth Arrest ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex ◽  
Reading Frame ◽  
Cycle Growth ◽  
M Phase ◽  
Dependent Growth ◽  
Synthetically Lethal

Adenovirus early region 4 open reading frame 4 (E4orf4) protein has been reported to induce p53-independent, protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A)–dependent apoptosis in transformed mammalian cells. In this report, we show that E4orf4 induces an irreversible growth arrest in Saccharomyces cerevisiae at the G2/M phase of the cell cycle. Growth inhibition requires the presence of yeast PP2A-Cdc55, and is accompanied by accumulation of reactive oxygen species. E4orf4 expression is synthetically lethal with mutants defective in mitosis, including Cdc28/Cdk1 and anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) mutants. Although APC/C activity is inhibited in the presence of E4orf4, Cdc28/Cdk1 is activated and partially counteracts the E4orf4-induced cell cycle arrest. The E4orf4–PP2A complex physically interacts with the APC/C, suggesting that E4orf4 functions by directly targeting PP2A to the APC/C, thereby leading to its inactivation. Finally, we show that E4orf4 can induce G2/M arrest in mammalian cells before apoptosis, indicating that E4orf4-induced events in yeast and mammalian cells are highly conserved.

scholarly journals The Paramyxovirus Simian Virus 5 V Protein Slows Progression of the Cell Cycle

2000 ◽  
Vol 74 (19) ◽  
pp. 9152-9166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grace Y. Lin ◽  
Robert A. Lamb
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Simian Virus ◽  
S Phase ◽  
V Protein ◽  
Simian Virus 5 ◽  
C Terminus ◽  
M Phase ◽  
Infected Cells ◽  
Affect Cell Cycle Progression

ABSTRACT Infection of cells by many viruses affects the cell division cycle of the host cell to favor viral replication. We examined the ability of the paramyxovirus simian parainfluenza virus 5 (SV5) to affect cell cycle progression, and we found that SV5 slows the rate of proliferation of HeLa T4 cells. The SV5-infected cells had a delayed transition from G1 to S phase and prolonged progression through S phase, and some of the infected cells were arrested in G2 or M phase. The levels of p53 and p21CIP1were not increased in SV5-infected cells compared to mock-infected cells, suggesting that the changes in the cell cycle occur through a p53-independent mechanism. However, the phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma protein (pRB) was delayed and prolonged in SV5-infected cells. The changes in the cell cycle were also observed in cells expressing the SV5 V protein but not in the cells expressing the SV5 P protein or the V protein lacking its unique C terminus (VΔC). The unique C terminus of the V protein of SV5 was shown previously to interact with DDB1, which is the 127-kDa subunit of the multifunctional damage-specific DNA-binding protein (DDB) heterodimer. The coexpression of DDB1 with V can partially restore the changes in the cell cycle caused by expression of the V protein.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document