scholarly journals Native and Recombinant Polycomb Group Complexes Establish a Selective Block to Template Accessibility To Repress Transcription In Vitro

2002 ◽  
Vol 22 (22) ◽  
pp. 7919-7928 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian F. G. King ◽  
Nicole J. Francis ◽  
Robert E. Kingston
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Nuclear Extract ◽  
Polycomb Group ◽  
Core Complex ◽  
In Vitro System ◽  
Hela Nuclear Extract ◽  
Transcription In Vitro ◽  
Polycomb Group Complexes

ABSTRACT Polycomb group (PcG) proteins are responsible for stable repression of homeotic gene expression during Drosophila melanogaster development. They are thought to stabilize chromatin structure to prevent transcription, though how they do this is unknown. We have established an in vitro system in which the PcG complex PRC1 and a recombinant PRC1 core complex (PCC) containing only PcG proteins are able to repress transcription by both RNA polymerase II and by T7 RNA polymerase. We find that assembly of the template into nucleosomes enhances repression by PRC1 and PCC. The subunit Psc is able to inhibit transcription on its own. PRC1- and PCC-repressed templates remain accessible to Gal4-VP16 binding, and incubation of the template with HeLa nuclear extract before the addition of PCC eliminates PCC repression. These results suggest that PcG proteins do not merely prohibit all transcription machinery from binding the template but instead likely inhibit specific steps in the transcription reaction.

scholarly journals Activation of yeast polymerase II transcription by herpesvirus VP16 and GAL4 derivatives in vitro.

1989 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 4746-4749 ◽  
Author(s):  
D I Chasman ◽  
J Leatherwood ◽  
M Carey ◽  
M Ptashne ◽  
R D Kornberg
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Fusion Proteins ◽  
In Vitro System ◽  
Transcription System ◽  
Natural Mechanism ◽  
Transcription In Vitro ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii Transcription ◽  
Fold Stimulation

Fusion proteins known to activate transcription in vivo were tested for the ability to stimulate transcription in vitro in a recently developed Saccharomyces cerevisiae RNA polymerase II transcription system. One fusion protein, whose activation domain was derived from the herpesvirus transcriptional activator VP16, gave more than 100-fold stimulation in the in vitro system. The order of effects of the various proteins was the same for transcription in vitro and in vivo, suggesting that the natural mechanism of activation is preserved in vitro.

The general transcription factor RAP30 binds to RNA polymerase II and prevents it from binding nonspecifically to DNA

1992 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-37
Author(s):  
M T Killeen ◽  
J F Greenblatt
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Small Subunit ◽  
Glutathione S Transferase ◽  
General Transcription Factor ◽  
Indirect Consequence ◽  
Transcription In Vitro ◽  
Sigma 70

RAP30/74 is a human general transcription factor that binds to RNA polymerase II and is required for initiation of transcription in vitro regardless of whether the promoter has a recognizable TATA box (Z. F. Burton, M. Killeen, M. Sopta, L. G. Ortolan, and J. F. Greenblatt, Mol. Cell. Biol. 8:1602-1613, 1988). Part of the amino acid sequence of RAP30, the small subunit of RAP30/74, has limited homology with part of Escherichia coli sigma 70 (M. Sopta, Z. F. Burton, and J. Greenblatt, Nature (London) 341:410-414, 1989). To determine which sigmalike activities of RAP30/74 could be attributed to RAP30, we purified human RAP30 and a RAP30-glutathione-S-transferase fusion protein that had been produced in E. coli. Bacterially produced RAP30 bound to RNA polymerase II in the absence of RAP74. Both partially purified natural RAP30/74 and recombinant RAP30 prevented RNA polymerase II from binding nonspecifically to DNA. In addition, nonspecific transcription by RNA polymerase II was greatly inhibited by RAP30-glutathione-S-transferase. DNA-bound RNA polymerase II could be removed from DNA by partially purified RAP30/74 but not by bacterially expressed RAP30. Thus, the ability of RAP30/74 to recruit RNA polymerase II to a promoter-bound preinitiation complex may be an indirect consequence of its ability to suppress nonspecific binding of RNA polymerase II to DNA.

scholarly journals In vitro analysis of a transcription termination site for RNA polymerase II.

1990 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 5782-5795 ◽  
Author(s):  
D K Wiest ◽  
D K Hawley
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Dna Sequences ◽  
Nuclear Extract ◽  
Transcription Unit ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Vitro Analysis

Transcription from the adenovirus major late (ML) promoter has previously been shown to pause or terminate prematurely in vivo and in vitro at a site within the first intron of the major late transcription unit. We are studying the mechanism of elongation arrest at this site in vitro to define the DNA sequences and proteins that determine the elongation behavior of RNA polymerase II. Our assay system consists of a nuclear extract prepared from cultured human cells. With standard reaction conditions, termination is not observed downstream of the ML promoter. However, in the presence of Sarkosyl, up to 80% of the transcripts terminate 186 nucleotides downstream of the start site. Using this assay, we showed that the DNA sequences required to promote maximal levels of termination downstream of the ML promoter reside within a 65-base-pair region and function in an orientation-dependent manner. To test whether elongation complexes from the ML promoter were functionally homogeneous, we determined the termination efficiency at each of two termination sites placed in tandem. We found that the behavior of the elongation complexes was different at these sites, with termination being greater at the downstream site over a wide range of Sarkosyl concentrations. This result ruled out a model in which the polymerases that read through the first site were stably modified to antiterminate. We also demonstrated that the ability of the elongation complexes to respond to the ML termination site was promoter specific, as the site did not function efficiently downstream of a heterologous promoter. Taken together, the results presented here are not consistent with the simplest class of models that have been proposed previously for the mechanism of Sarkosyl-induced termination.

Synthetic octapeptide pyroGLU-ASP-ASP-SER-ASP-GLU-GLU-ASN controls DNA transcription in vitro by RNA polymerase II

1993 ◽  
Vol 49 (10) ◽  
pp. 902-905 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Angiolillo ◽  
A. Desgro ◽  
V. Marsili ◽  
F. Panara ◽  
G. L. Gianfranceschi
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Dna Transcription ◽  
Transcription In Vitro

[38] RNA polymerase II transcription in vitro

1991 ◽  
pp. 545-550 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neal F. Lue ◽  
Peter M. Flanagan ◽  
Raymond J. Kelleher ◽  
Aled M. Edwards ◽  
Roger D. Kornberg
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Transcription In Vitro ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii Transcription

Mechanism of RNA polymerase II-specific initiation of transcription in vitro: ATP requirement and uncapped runoff transcripts

Cell ◽  
1982 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 877-886 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Bunick ◽  
Ruben Zandomeni ◽  
Steven Ackerman ◽  
Roberto Weinmann
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Initiation Of Transcription ◽  
Transcription In Vitro

scholarly journals In vitro initiation of transcription by RNA polymerase II on in vivo-assembled chromatin templates.

1992 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 1639-1651 ◽  
Author(s):  
S C Batson ◽  
R Sundseth ◽  
C V Heath ◽  
M Samuels ◽  
U Hansen
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Viral Dna ◽  
Dna Templates ◽  
Initiation Of Transcription ◽  
Transcription In Vitro ◽  
Alpha Amanitin

We have studied the initiation of transcription in vitro by RNA polymerase II on simian virus 40 (SV40) minichromosomal templates isolated from infected cells. The efficiency and pattern of transcription from the chromatin templates were compared with those from viral DNA templates by using two in vitro transcription systems, either HeLa whole-cell extract or basal transcription factors, RNA polymerase II, and one of two SV40 promoter-binding transcription factors, LSF and Sp1. Dramatic increases in numbers of transcripts upon addition of transcription extract and different patterns of usage of the multiple SV40 initiation sites upon addition of Sp1 versus LSF strongly suggested that transcripts were being initiated from the minichromosomal templates in vitro. That the majority of transcripts from the minichromosomes were due to initiation de novo was demonstrated by the efficient transcription observed in the presence of alpha-amanitin, which inhibited minichromosome-associated RNA polymerase II, and an alpha-amanitin-resistant RNA polymerase II, which initiated transcription in vitro. The pattern of transcription from the SV40 late and early promoters on the minichromosomal templates was similar to the in vivo pattern of transcription during the late stages of viral infection and was distinct from the pattern of transcription generated from viral DNA in vitro. In particular, the late promoter of the minichromosomal templates was transcribed with high efficiency, similar to viral DNA templates, while the early-early promoter of the minichromosomal templates was inhibited 10- to 15-fold. Finally, the number of minichromosomes competent to initiate transcription in vitro exceeded the amount actively being transcribed in vivo.

scholarly journals Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein K is a transcription factor.

1996 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 2350-2360 ◽  
Author(s):  
E F Michelotti ◽  
G A Michelotti ◽  
A I Aronsohn ◽  
D Levens
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Hnrnp K ◽  
Heterogeneous Nuclear Ribonucleoprotein ◽  
Transcription In Vitro ◽  
Nuclear Ribonucleoprotein ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii Transcription

The CT element is a positively acting homopyrimidine tract upstream of the c-myc gene to which the well-characterized transcription factor Spl and heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein (hnRNP) K, a less well-characterized protein associated with hnRNP complexes, have previously been shown to bind. The present work demonstrates that both of these molecules contribute to CT element-activated transcription in vitro. The pyrimidine-rich strand of the CT element both bound to hnRNP K and competitively inhibited transcription in vitro, suggesting a role for hnRNP K in activating transcription through this single-stranded sequence. Direct addition of recombinant hnRNP K to reaction mixtures programmed with templates bearing single-stranded CT elements increased specific RNA synthesis. If hnRNP K is a transcription factor, then interactions with the RNA polymerase II transcription apparatus are predicted. Affinity columns charged with recombinant hnRNP K specifically bind a component(s) necessary for transcription activation. The depleted factors were biochemically complemented by a crude TFIID phosphocellulose fraction, indicating that hnRNP K might interact with the TATA-binding protein (TBP)-TBP-associated factor complex. Coimmunoprecipitation of a complex formed in vivo between hnRNP K and epitope-tagged TBP as well as binding in vitro between recombinant proteins demonstrated a protein-protein interaction between TBP and hnRNP K. Furthermore, when the two proteins were overexpressed in vivo, transcription from a CT element-dependent reporter was synergistically activated. These data indicate that hnRNP K binds to a specific cis element, interacts with the RNA polymerase II transcription machinery, and stimulates transcription and thus has all of the properties of a transcription factor.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document